You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

VieBleu ago

There is no logical fallacy in advocating that there be no promotion of violence within this forum. If you see one, you need to make it crystal clear.

kekistocrat ago

Perhaps you misunderstood... The logical fallacy began with Phobos' assertion that I '... disliked a post about not being violent.' See for yourself: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1470365/7130262 One can clearly see from my rebuttal, https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1470365/7135342, that 'I stated quite clearly that I agree about no violence but disagree with acknowledgement of gunman.' Seems to be a form of the 'begging the question' fallacy. I don't make this stuff up because I'm hurt. On the contrary, it is because I do not use emotions to guide my logic that I am able to see through these logical fallacies. This stuff was already made up by humans long before I arrived, both fallacies and their deliverance, logic. In regards to your second statement: No disrespect, but I shouldn't have to point this out. That is the beauty in learning the Trivium; you can spot the fallacies and thus it will become crystal clear. Good luck to you.

VieBleu ago

thanks for your reply.