You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

kekistocrat ago

I will not give acknowledgement or validity or any sense of legitimacy to the 'armed vigilante.' He is a patsy and the ordeal was a setup to smear the investigation. Anyone doing the investigating here knows this and it is folly to give any credibility to that event other than it being staged. The guy did no 'self-investigating.' It was a smear. Agreed, we do not condone violence. However, we do not need NVC (non-violent communication) or NLP (neuro-linguistic programming.)

Gorillion ago

Yeah, this is a very backhanded posting. It's a weird mix of back patting and back stabbing.

His post history seems legit, but this feels like the work of a counter-agent. Phrased like a "When did you stop hitting your wife?" type of self-incrimination move. The 70 upvoats is a worry also.

We don't have to "reject violence" because we haven't committed any. OP is just dignifying it with an unnecessary response.

OP, stop being a shill, or stop proliferating enemy propaganda.

Phobos_Mothership ago

found the downvoter

kekistocrat ago

Downvote. Why do you feel the need to point out the downvoters as a moderator? Shouldn't you be applauding the quasi-democratic voating process here? This needs to be pointed out since you're a moderator.

Phobos_Mothership ago

I have no obligation to like the fact that someone disliked a post about not being violent, that's democracy. Free speech all around.

kekistocrat ago

'disliked a post about not being violent' -- That is not what I disliked. I stated quite clearly that I agree about no violence but disagree with acknowledgement of gunman. Your choice of words does only adds credibility to my assertion that you're using NLP or NVC. A concerned voater asks you formally to edit your statement.

kekistocrat ago

I can't downvote. Don't have enough 'points.'

numbchuck1 ago

Ask @numbchuck to downvote for you. Its his job anyways. Paid to downvote anyone who doesn't have points.