Hello,

Here's why I think this might be the case:

The context

Some years ago, some people in power noticed social media focusing on discussion(reddit) could potentially form a problem somewhere down the dark road they were leading us.

They thought, of course, of simply controling reddit. But that alone wouldn't work, because of something economists call the market.

They needed something ready and effective to take reddit's place for communities banned for their speech from the platform.

The Mechanics, or how they mute and destroy a community making that digital migration

Like mentioned above, the power of these connecting interfaces(socials), in this case reddit, is the sheer amount of free speech.

On voat however, speech is everything but free. The system that selects which content is provided for consumption is based on 'up voats' and 'down voats' that come with rigid restrictions.

Probably the largest part of redditters that migrated here were new users.

A new user can

• Post
• Comment
• Upvoat 10 times a day

A new user NEEDS

• 10 comment points to make unlock more upvoats

• 10 comment points to send a message to someone...

• 100 comment contribution points to downvote(how many times?)

Is there anyone with more insight in the limits that come after these numbers?

Then there is also a character limit that seems completely arbitraty but might be based on voats?

In other words, new users can only be(very) marginal participants in the mechanic that controls for provided content, the voats. Hammering a new user with a few downvoats is all that is needed. New members resort to 'attention seeking' comments and posts to get their voats up. It all adds to the chaos. They say this about their genius invention:

This requirement was established as a measure to encourage new members to get involved and participate in discussions.

Really? They want to stimulate all the shy guys on the internet to participate? Please...

**What this really is, is a war operation, and I can't understand others can't see this. ** An example

Have a look at this post

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1467451

The only post made by this contributor.

The top reply to this post was made by a user who also posted this

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1446112

And seems to post a lot of "entertainment " which receives a lot of attention.

This is what they have done: they have provided an extremely flawed(from our POV) system as the replacement of reddit.

They produce some obvious "shilling" on it

They say reply to themselves, wahah! Don't worry, these "shills" are so stupid, it's so obvious! We destroyed them on reddit and we will destroy them here.

No, we will not, because reddit didn't have restrictive voats.

Not only speech in written words needs to be free. Judgment of that speech needs to be free too, this is maybe even more important.

Maybe the real pizzagatekeepers should dig a little into with what money Atif Colo conjured this little site into existence in 2014.