They're trying to manipulate the comments in our threads by having their whole team infiltrate a certain thread, one of them makes an anti-pizzagate comment, and their whole team upvotes it.
Most likely option. When its a majority of them taking on a single thread, their strategy is much more effective. They can create an illusion (or try to) that the morale of the userbase in the thread is quite low. They enjoy demoralizing us by questioning the effectiveness of our strategies, the credibility of our findings, and the propagation of our evidence. The fact alone that this individual was talking about us posting "fake news" is all the evidence I need just based on the fact that we know the foundation of "Fake News" is bullshit and fake in and of itself. Nobody in their right minds, if read enough on the investigation and the context of it, would ever say anything is "fake news".
Their techniques are not new. If cognizant, you can sniff them out from a mile away. They are always quite far behind us in terms of dealing with them and moving forward. Their act is incredibly transparent and borderline pathetic.
So it's obvious to me that they're not doing this to change the minds of people who believe in pizzagate. Rather, they want to make it so that anyone new to pizzagate and come here for the first time will have their mind changed because of all the upvoats. So then the question becomes what do we do about it?
I believe the best course of action would be to lend minimum or zero time to shill replies and shill threads if they really reek of the shit. Be weary of them splitting us into different groups based on major findings - I.E perhaps going down the MK Ultra connection route, or staying with the evidence we're working with so far. Upvote and reply to those who seem to be genuine in their intent while downvoting any obvious shill attempts. We may even have to keep an eye out for threads that won't even MAKE IT to the top just based on the potential of them effectively suppressing new evidence before it has a chance to be looked into.
view the rest of the comments →
anon123 ago
They're trying to manipulate the comments in our threads by having their whole team infiltrate a certain thread, one of them makes an anti-pizzagate comment, and their whole team upvotes it.
SluggishJ ago
Most likely option. When its a majority of them taking on a single thread, their strategy is much more effective. They can create an illusion (or try to) that the morale of the userbase in the thread is quite low. They enjoy demoralizing us by questioning the effectiveness of our strategies, the credibility of our findings, and the propagation of our evidence. The fact alone that this individual was talking about us posting "fake news" is all the evidence I need just based on the fact that we know the foundation of "Fake News" is bullshit and fake in and of itself. Nobody in their right minds, if read enough on the investigation and the context of it, would ever say anything is "fake news".
Their techniques are not new. If cognizant, you can sniff them out from a mile away. They are always quite far behind us in terms of dealing with them and moving forward. Their act is incredibly transparent and borderline pathetic.
anon123 ago
So it's obvious to me that they're not doing this to change the minds of people who believe in pizzagate. Rather, they want to make it so that anyone new to pizzagate and come here for the first time will have their mind changed because of all the upvoats. So then the question becomes what do we do about it?
SluggishJ ago
I believe the best course of action would be to lend minimum or zero time to shill replies and shill threads if they really reek of the shit. Be weary of them splitting us into different groups based on major findings - I.E perhaps going down the MK Ultra connection route, or staying with the evidence we're working with so far. Upvote and reply to those who seem to be genuine in their intent while downvoting any obvious shill attempts. We may even have to keep an eye out for threads that won't even MAKE IT to the top just based on the potential of them effectively suppressing new evidence before it has a chance to be looked into.
Wage_Slave217 ago
/reportctr is a great place