You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Synxsynxsynx ago

But who is it?

ThisNameAlreadyTaken ago

Hopefully not the CIA.

It would be cool if it was Q.

OP, can you put up a canary?

AmaleksHairyAss ago

If I were Put I would be SO tempted to remove "superinjunctions" from that list just to fuck with people.

fusir ago

I see there is no mention of regular old subpoenas and warrants. So basically if the FBI does anything we won't hear about it.. unless it also involves the pentagon, then we will.

AmaleksHairyAss ago

It would mean he's allowed to talk about warrants and subpoenas. It wouldn't make sense to say he's not compelled to be silent and then be silent anyway. If he were duplicitous or if the site were forcibly taken over his account could just post the same canary anyway. So if you trust the canary you should trust there are no evil shenanigans.

fusir ago

Yeah, but he could opt not to, and really that is 90% of the issue. Yes a canary is necessary for the others if and only if he has a policy of disclosing government seizures. If he is interested in disclosing government seizures he should go ahead and post the 90% relevant item along with the canaries. If he isn't interested in disclosing seizures the canaries are a pointless exercise in appeasement that only takes care of some ridiculously uncommon situations.

fuckmyreddit ago

Ok. I usually do a search when a term is unfamiliar, but what is a canary?

AmaleksHairyAss ago

google "warrant canary" and look at the link in this thread.