You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

LlamaMan ago

Sweet. Thank you, getting kind of sick of him. @noobftw is next methinks.

noobftw ago

And what rule have I violated?

Go ahead and point to it. I'll wait. You're welcome to come over to /v/Chicago and post if you're not 1) Posting about crime, which belongs elsewhere, 2) Not brigading, 3) Not in the sub for the sole purpose of being a general dick.

Wahaha ago

A sub about Chicago without crime would be empty, wouldn't it? Nothing else to report..

JunOS ago

No rules violated, but being an abusive mod or controlling the 'free speech' aspect will get you kicked the fuck out. Source? This thread about sanegroup getting the boot. Bwahahha

Tipman79 ago

You know the difference you fucking redditor faggot. Why don't you stop pretending like you don't. You "control that sub". You fucking SRS disease. Get over yourself.

The only reason you're answering these comments is because you see that Putt is stepping in on similar situations and you're scared that you're next. lol. what a bitch you are.

leaffur ago

Kill yourself. Please. Livestream it so we can watch.

LlamaMan ago

You're just a fucking nigger of a person and don't belong in a society free to speak their mind.

Ywis ago

What about crime in Chicago though?

european ago

you just deleted my post about unemployment citing rule 2.

Artofchoke ago

Honey. I see your point, but you have to realize it doesn't work that way here. Let people speak, even if they're stupid, even if they're wrong. You are fighting uphill on this, and no matter how well intended, it's a violation of the basic tenets of Voat. Relent. Nobody gonna hold a grudge, and anybody that does ain't shit. I love you, you have a good day bunny. hugs

MrPim ago

Why is crime in any city not relevant to that cities sub?

noobftw ago

It is relevant, and that is why there is a whole subverse dedicated to it. /v/ChicagoCrime.

We remove it from the sub for the same reason /v/Videos has chosen to remove porn (isn't porn a video?) from /v/Videos. If we allow it, then the sub becomes nothing but that. So a whole sub has been dedicated just for that purpose. When I can post videos of porn and gore to /v/videos, then we'll remove the rule forbidding Chicago Crime in /v/Chicago/

MrPim ago

Porn make Videos a NSFW sub. Moving crime stories has no function other than to hide stories you dont like.

Tetromino ago

It's a tried and true shill tactic, forcing commentary they don't like to other subs is called "containment".

Same goes for the "free speech zone" at some colleges, where you're not allowed to exercise 1st amendment rights except in a dedicated zone. Otherwise you risk hurting their groupthink and violating their "safe spaces".

Chimaira92 ago

Which is one of the biggest problems I have with r/The_donald banning people and referring them to r/askthe_donald, oh well. That place is pretty low energy now. I don't even see the same top posters around any more.

MrPim ago

Yeah i know. But he has no way of justifying it beyond that containment. And his comparison to Videos makes this clear. They have a valid reason and he has none.

Tetromino ago

agreed. Porn isn't a narrative, it's a type of content. Not really containment to differentiate on that level. But the Chicago shit going down now is trying to take a topic and apply arbitrary discrimination to views to push a political goal, to contain the truth of the situation while allowing the stuff that is "on-message". Protip: This is the true meaning of "politically correct", censorship in the name of pushing a narrative.

Now, news is a legit subcategory. So, one could say, "any news about chicago goes in the ChicagoNews sub". However, then you wouldn't be able to selectively censor certain type of news in order to push a narrative. Additionally it would be blatantly obvious that removing news from v/Chicago is assinine, as news about Chicago is relevant to Chicago. Containment is a form of Divide and Conquer. The key thing is to note what narrative is being maintained by the containment or censorship. For example, it would make no sense to branch off v/ChicagoDogs and say no dog posts in v/Chicago, because that's not pushing a narrative (unless the place was overrun by stray dogs and there were pro-dog-immigration groups denying the harm of living among roving packs of rabid leg humpers).

8584126? ago

Crime is very relevant to Chicago since that's it's biggest problem.

rightbyroy ago

If Chicago solves its nigger problem you'll see that crime problem evaporate.