I have read that link and I agree with a lot of what you have stated both there and in here. It will change how I interact and view TOO from here on out. His action are not conducive to the message he tries(fakes?) to support, for instance in the fuark affair he pretty much hopped on the bandwagon, but with his repeated spamming and over emotional stance on the matter instead of speaking from a position of good moral standing drove a lot of people to be dismissive and overlook the real issue of content involving a sexualized minor being posted to a porn sub. This muddied the water and I thought less of it then compared to now, only once the truth of the issue was established outside of his postings (read one of the major talking points of your post) did the majority of people that were aware of the issue start speaking out more openly against fuark.

I may have been a bit naive / uninformed about TOO in the broad picture, I imagined him less in a sinister guise and more as an attention and power seeking way. One more ruled by emotional over-reacting with spamming and misguided attacks. Still there is no defense for his spamming the same messages repeatedly and his re-posting others links without even changing the title minutes later(an attempt to reinforce image/standing?). As far as Dortex his repeated and dedicated defense of pedos and explicit content involving minors makes it impossible for me to see him as anything but an actual pedo, even if he has reason to "fight" against TOO it does not explain his attempts to derail and spam what I have posted as well as that of others that attacks pedos.

Another bit of my standing on these issues. I spoke out against the banning of Aged in gaming because of the nature of it, there not being rules ahead of time and making a rule after the fact of the ban being a major breach of free speech and trust in the moderation of the site. Yet I was in the boat that wanted rules for the sub to be amended if that was the public consensus for gaming. I also advocated for Aged to be site wide banned for his previous posting of little girls from those specific "European modeling agencies" despite me being in support of his gaming ban being lifted. Dortex tried here in his reply to you to derail from fuarks posting of the same type of "modeling" and trick you into thinking he supported out outside of being targeted by TOO.

I see odd similarities between TOO and Dortex in these regards. This is at least something for me to be more mindful of.

I have pinged you in another post I wrote as you made this before I saw this, I will take time to look at the link you shared and ask you read what I shared on the other post before I reply to this properly.

No one is denying theoldones can spam and overreact, I am pointing out what your "dog in the fight is", which obviously got under your skin here. Yet again you try to re-frame the narrative to defend yourself. Don't tell me you are becoming a one trick pony.