When @theoldones starts his witch hunt again after his "apology"

Who knows, That was Laura B he posted though so at least TOO is going after actual pedos now; What I was told on 4chan and 8chan over the years is that she's lewd model that never did CP so while it's all legal I know people don't want that content on voat, especially after 8chan's perpetual de-listing, aged is just some autismo who likes 2d girls and vidya, fuark looked to be pushing boundaries with purpose.

All said it's nobody's place to harass the cunts for what legal and non rule breaking content they post. If those faggots actually cared or had numbers they would make their own subs and just ban the self appointed witch hunters. __ OK just looked at fuark's sub, he is the image of degeneracy, I'm all for people not being censored, and he wasn't, and I'm all for people not being unduely censured and frankly I don't think anybody here could hate that PoS unduly.

I've made it a habit most o my life to talk to people I don't understand and I can tell you even among pedos I think they would hate Fuark, he's a creepy rape fetishist that seems to like abusing little girls and possibly interacial cuck porn.

That guy needed an intervention on pornography probably ten years ago.

I'm still not going to praise witch hunters for getting just 1 out of 100 right.

link

Octocopter 5.9 years ago

You are not going to get an honest discussion out of Dortex, he is clearly a pedo acceptance propagandist. He sees your desire to preserve free speech and your understanding that drawing are truly fake and a mostly non-issue and is seeking to use you to reinforce support for his agenda.

I don't really know you but this post you made shows to me you are not the same as Dortex, I hope you don't fall for his false narratives.

link

Obrez 5.9 years ago

I'm someone knee deep in a decade of information warfare, what I see is TOO using old tricks to manipulate people into witch hunts on issues he doesn't care about so that he can wrest some power and clout from each affair, in Dortex I see somebody irked by TOO and directly targeted even though I haven't seen anything he's posted as being any more worthy of targeting by TOO than myself and he's hitting back by feeding him his own medicine. Directly refuting lies and getting people to read that is a whole lot more difficult than defaming somebody in the same way they defame others. Incidentally what TOO did is actually a tactic to get CP which has been used with success on 4chan and 8chan in the past.

If I'm being as cynical about dortex's objectives and motivations as I possibly could be I see him harming Voat far less than TOO already has. So as I see it the issue is between a feral cat and a snake, I would take the feral cat any day, especially so after having been bit by the snake.

To be clear, I don't think he's a pedo propagandist, I think TOO has just pissed off too many people too often and has made enemies who want to see him banned, I myself think he(TOO), his tactics and soft headed machinations, is a bigger threat than aged ever was.

If you aren't aware here is a peek into myself and others experiences with TOO: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3043427

link

Octocopter 5.9 years ago

I have read that link and I agree with a lot of what you have stated both there and in here. It will change how I interact and view TOO from here on out. His action are not conducive to the message he tries(fakes?) to support, for instance in the fuark affair he pretty much hopped on the bandwagon, but with his repeated spamming and over emotional stance on the matter instead of speaking from a position of good moral standing drove a lot of people to be dismissive and overlook the real issue of content involving a sexualized minor being posted to a porn sub. This muddied the water and I thought less of it then compared to now, only once the truth of the issue was established outside of his postings (read one of the major talking points of your post) did the majority of people that were aware of the issue start speaking out more openly against fuark.

I may have been a bit naive / uninformed about TOO in the broad picture, I imagined him less in a sinister guise and more as an attention and power seeking way. One more ruled by emotional over-reacting with spamming and misguided attacks. Still there is no defense for his spamming the same messages repeatedly and his re-posting others links without even changing the title minutes later(an attempt to reinforce image/standing?). As far as Dortex his repeated and dedicated defense of pedos and explicit content involving minors makes it impossible for me to see him as anything but an actual pedo, even if he has reason to "fight" against TOO it does not explain his attempts to derail and spam what I have posted as well as that of others that attacks pedos.

Another bit of my standing on these issues. I spoke out against the banning of Aged in gaming because of the nature of it, there not being rules ahead of time and making a rule after the fact of the ban being a major breach of free speech and trust in the moderation of the site. Yet I was in the boat that wanted rules for the sub to be amended if that was the public consensus for gaming. I also advocated for Aged to be site wide banned for his previous posting of little girls from those specific "European modeling agencies" despite me being in support of his gaming ban being lifted. Dortex tried here in his reply to you to derail from fuarks posting of the same type of "modeling" and trick you into thinking he supported out outside of being targeted by TOO.

I see odd similarities between TOO and Dortex in these regards. This is at least something for me to be more mindful of.

link

Octocopter 5.9 years ago

I have pinged you in another post I wrote as you made this before I saw this, I will take time to look at the link you shared and ask you read what I shared on the other post before I reply to this properly.

link