Tired of the drama? You can block BOTH users and subverses! (SBBHTantrums)

submitted ago by Crensch

@ExpertShitposter writes:

Zyklon has been sperging out with pings and threats against kids. Everyone called him out on his shit. However, anyone can block him.

Why look at that! He's right! Honestly, I cannot argue with this. Well done!

Crensch has engaged in reddit style moderation with pre-emptive bans based on association. No one can stop his bans.

Well, let's see how this pans out in a nice little Voat graphic:

Can be blocked
Zyklon_b ✅
Crensch ✅

REEEE U CAN BLOCK ZYKLON REEEEE -> You can block Crensch and GA, too.

Or crensch heavy handed banning behavior makes it normal for everyone to ban anyone in defense against "shills".

All you lazy fucks had to do was turn on your weakest link with the fervor you turn on mods that don't toe the line you draw for them. But he wasn't your weakest link, was he? He was an art project - like the "art" students in the towers before (((9-11))).

Keep in mind, when 2020 comes around, r/the_donald will probably finally get banned from reddit for real this time, and we will potentially become minorities compared to fresh reddit refugees. And this time they won't have a home to run back to, and won't be BTFO'd as easily as last time.

They won't be BTFO'd at all. I'll create a subverse for them and run roughshod all over anyone still stuck in the bubble of (((free speech))) as you know it.

Most people agree that both of them are wrong, but who is a bigger threat to voat?

Do everyone here a favor and define this "voat" that I'm a threat to. I'd love to have that discussion soon.

@Trigglypuff writes:

Goats used to pride themselves on having thick skins.

But also wrote:

That’s when it got personal tbh.

Where's that thick skin? You took the revealing of a PM you ADMITTED made you sound like a loon, and plastered images she's previously removed from her other accounts all over a custom-built subverse. YOU think you have room to talk about thick skin? Or about women being emotional? Or how there are NO women on the internet?

It made you sound like a loon? Yeah, it did. So much so that I had the kind of cognitive dissonance you get when an AXIOM of your life is brought into question by something so solid you cannot dismiss it.

YOU did that. I don't even know how someone can manage to look so much like a goddamned shill/liar even when they are and are low-IQ. It was mind-boggling. It tripped nearly every red flag my mind could be bothered to muster through the state of shock it was in.

Even your re-reading of it got you to that conclusion; and now the (((emotional woman))) of voat has to go around talking shit about other women to feel better about herself.

We were fucking iconoclasts.

We were... in our bubble of internal logic. Now I am, outside of your bubble of logic.

All I see now is faggotry over beliefs

Beliefs like:

Hence Crensch is more dangerous to free speech

That's a belief, is it not?

What about this one:

q is definitely a Jewish lie

... which has been used to excuse any number of attacks on Q people, who have, to their credit, laughed with you almost invariably, to the point of referring to themselves as "qtards" now and then?

Consistency.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

heygeorge ago

To summarize:

  • If someone is sperging and you don’t care for it, you can block them.

  • If a mod banned you from a subverse for whatever reason, you can block yourself from seeing the posts you are not allowed to participate in.

  • These unequal ideas are presented as equivalent.

  • Triggly did not like that srayz shared a private conversation. This means she is an emotional woman.

  • You, Crensch, are no longer an iconoclast [n. A person who attacks cherished beliefs or institutions]

  • Some Qtards are good people.

Am I close? I think I’m close.

ExpertShitposter ago

Crensch has basically become an emotionally retarded faggot. We have seen this kind of switch before with 9-11, and a few others. Its always like this. So this is something one has to keep in mind when talking to him in the future.

The biggest extremists always turn out to be the biggest kikes. Kind of like when the original owner of v/niggers turned out to be a self admitted jew.

Crensch ago

It's easier to tone fallacy and dismiss my words as 'emotional'.

It's laughable to suggest retardation or Jewry, though. Do you notice any pilpul in my words? Loxism? Anti-white anything? Hell, I pointed out that so many of you are fucking mix-breeds or race-traitors already, but I don't see you calling out those users.

All I'm doing is defending a group of people capable of learning that the Holocaust might be a lie from the kind of people that want to run them off. What the fuck kind of people do you want here, anyway? Goat-On-Arrival types? Where do you find those, I wonder?

You really should try better to define the Voat you think you are defending; it's kind of central to the tenets of this particular crusade.

ExpertShitposter ago

By far the most important thing for survival of the white race is separation from blacks and jews. Everything else is less important. Because all other factors will determine will whites prosper more or less. But separatism will determine will they even survive or just die out in the next 300 years.

So any speech or actions that go against white separatism is evidence of lunacy or deliberate jewery. One look at the sidebar in QRV is all one need to know about (((Q))) and its followers. Its designed to keep people in the rat race, hoping for a simple political solution. Hey hey.....don't rock the boat now......wouldn't wanna risk losing my comforts now.....

You ban people who would speak out against Q and Trump kikery.

Crensch ago

By far the most important thing for survival of the white race is separation from blacks and jews.

The kinds of people that zyklon acts exactly like, 100% of the time? Got it.

Everything else is less important.

I agree.

Because all other factors will determine will whites prosper more or less. But separatism will determine will they even survive or just die out in the next 300 years.

I agree.

So any speech or actions that go against white separatism is evidence of lunacy or deliberate jewery.

How would you go about recruiting people to your side? Do you have the numbers to be the obvious, ubiquitous social in-group that everyone wants to join? Or are you still outside the Overton Window and you have to slowly redpill your recruits?

One look at the sidebar in QRV is all one need to know about (((Q))) and its followers.

QRV is an abortion and always has been. The mods there aren't even legit by Q/boomer standards. Did you miss that?

Its designed to keep people in the rat race, hoping for a simple political solution.

A subverse of 13,000 had its mod question the Holocaust, and because it wasn't a purity-spiraling white supremacy rant, it's not enough for you.

You SBBH faggots are like spoiled children that want everything RIGHT NOW and don't want to work or wait for it, even when it is very obviously heading towards the reward you want.

Hey hey.....don't rock the boat now......wouldn't wanna risk losing my comforts now.....

Yeah, because you convince people to toss away their comforts and prepare to kill niggers by shouting at them from your soap box. This, too, is a defense mechanism in your mind against Q. It's unreasonable. Irrational. There's nothing to recommend your position on it whatsoever.

You ban people who would speak out against Q and Trump kikery.

I ban people who would shit on the carpet.

I have a subverse specifically for people like you that want to argue against Q. I haven't seen it today, but as of last night, nobody had anything but personal attacks on Q and the followers, and the same bad arguments.

It's not convincing when you tell people you'd act like a spoiled dictator if you became POTUS, and that you'd kick the rule of law and all the other shit you'd need to do to the wayside while jailing and hanging people that hadn't even been tried in a court of law yet.

That's what your arguments look like from the outside, whether you like it or not.

ExpertShitposter ago

zyklon

These problems internal to the race will be dealt with afterwards. Same as always throughout history.

recruiting people to your side

Certainly not by banning radicals for being too radical.

QRV is an abortion

Same shit in all Q subs. Same crowd.

I have a subverse specifically for people like you that want to argue against Q

Your 13,000 dont go to that subverse.

Cant find my favorite infographics on lemmings. But in any case, you should read siege if you haven't already. Tho its ideas might be outdated by now due to the internet.

Crensch ago

These problems internal to the race will be dealt with afterwards. Same as always throughout history.

Oh, I agree.

Certainly not by banning radicals for being too radical.

That's a loss prevention strategy. Did you have one of those?

Same shit in all Q subs. Same crowd.

Nah. Some overlap but mostly very different kind of people.

Your 13,000 dont go to that subverse.

They don't need to. I'm enough to ask the right questions to get you all to realize you don't have a leg to stand on when you pull out your megaphone and soapbox.

Cant find my favorite infographics on lemmings. But in any case, you should read siege if you haven't already. Tho its ideas might be outdated by now due to the internet.

Analog ideas are usually fairly easy to translate to digital mediums. I don't know when I'll have time, but if I think about it, I'll definitely do that.

ExpertShitposter ago

different kind of people.

or maybe they just speak differently when not covered by the veil of 100% true anonymity?

I don't know when I'll have time

We should probably set aside 1h per day for reading old literature. Its interesting to see things from the perspective of a person who was actually a part of American Nazi party.

Crensch ago

or maybe they just speak differently when not covered by the veil of 100% true anonymity?

That's a lot of credit you're giving to boomers.

We should probably set aside 1h per day for reading old literature. Its interesting to see things from the perspective of a person who was actually part of the American Nazi party.

I usually have plenty of time and mind to do so - when things are calm here. It would be interesting. GLR is one of my favourites.