@ExpertShitposter writes:
Zyklon has been sperging out with pings and threats against kids. Everyone called him out on his shit. However, anyone can block him.
Why look at that! He's right! Honestly, I cannot argue with this. Well done!
Crensch has engaged in reddit style moderation with pre-emptive bans based on association. No one can stop his bans.
Well, let's see how this pans out in a nice little Voat graphic:
|
Can be blocked |
| Zyklon_b |
✅ |
| Crensch |
✅ |
REEEE U CAN BLOCK ZYKLON REEEEE -> You can block Crensch and GA, too.
Or crensch heavy handed banning behavior makes it normal for everyone to ban anyone in defense against "shills".
All you lazy fucks had to do was turn on your weakest link with the fervor you turn on mods that don't toe the line you draw for them. But he wasn't your weakest link, was he? He was an art project - like the "art" students in the towers before (((9-11))).
Keep in mind, when 2020 comes around, r/the_donald will probably finally get banned from reddit for real this time, and we will potentially become minorities compared to fresh reddit refugees. And this time they won't have a home to run back to, and won't be BTFO'd as easily as last time.
They won't be BTFO'd at all. I'll create a subverse for them and run roughshod all over anyone still stuck in the bubble of (((free speech))) as you know it.
Most people agree that both of them are wrong, but who is a bigger threat to voat?
Do everyone here a favor and define this "voat" that I'm a threat to. I'd love to have that discussion soon.
@Trigglypuff writes:
Goats used to pride themselves on having thick skins.
But also wrote:
That’s when it got personal tbh.
Where's that thick skin? You took the revealing of a PM you ADMITTED made you sound like a loon, and plastered images she's previously removed from her other accounts all over a custom-built subverse. YOU think you have room to talk about thick skin? Or about women being emotional? Or how there are NO women on the internet?
It made you sound like a loon? Yeah, it did. So much so that I had the kind of cognitive dissonance you get when an AXIOM of your life is brought into question by something so solid you cannot dismiss it.
YOU did that. I don't even know how someone can manage to look so much like a goddamned shill/liar even when they are and are low-IQ. It was mind-boggling. It tripped nearly every red flag my mind could be bothered to muster through the state of shock it was in.
Even your re-reading of it got you to that conclusion; and now the (((emotional woman))) of voat has to go around talking shit about other women to feel better about herself.
We were fucking iconoclasts.
We were... in our bubble of internal logic. Now I am, outside of your bubble of logic.
All I see now is faggotry over beliefs
Beliefs like:
Hence Crensch is more dangerous to free speech
That's a belief, is it not?
What about this one:
q is definitely a Jewish lie
... which has been used to excuse any number of attacks on Q people, who have, to their credit, laughed with you almost invariably, to the point of referring to themselves as "qtards" now and then?
Consistency.
view the rest of the comments →
heygeorge ago
To summarize:
If someone is sperging and you don’t care for it, you can block them.
If a mod banned you from a subverse for whatever reason, you can block yourself from seeing the posts you are not allowed to participate in.
These unequal ideas are presented as equivalent.
Triggly did not like that srayz shared a private conversation. This means she is an emotional woman.
You, Crensch, are no longer an iconoclast [n. A person who attacks cherished beliefs or institutions]
Some Qtards are good people.
Am I close? I think I’m close.
Crensch ago
That's what everyone keeps telling me!
Yep!
I wasn't going to go there, but you're right!
If the sperg is threatening and spamming and going too far, you can block them, but they can make alts, and ping you, and ping your buddies, and clutter up your posts, and stalk your comments, and ping his buddies to you, and doxx you or spread your self-doxxed photos around trying to REALLY doxx you, or pretending to, but it's OK because it's a joke.
If a subverse bans you, you can remove it from your experience and...??? what happens? Nothing.
You did yourself no favors bringing that up.
Oh, her retaliation wasn't exactly like srayzie not letting go of when someone attacked her? Right. (((Chosen one))). Oh, wait, do I get to mock you for being cucked by her? Did she send you tit pics to try and hide the fact that she's an overemotional fronthole? Le white knight, heygeorge?
Srayzie made posts. Trigglypuff made a fucking subverse with a CSS altar to someone she was hypocritically attacking for... what?
Overreacting?
Kek. <---
Kek.
Kek.
That you think that shows that you still don't understand what I'm doing.
Does this surprise you, or something? They've put up with the mockery like fucking champs, when YOU couldn't handle when an overemotional girl accidentally grouped all of SBBH together as possibly going to attack GA. You whined like a little bitch over that, yet look at what happened? Not only did you prove her right, but you took her mistake like an emotional woman.
How do you square that circle?
I think you're close to something, but you don't even realize what it is, and the realization of it won't be fun. What you thought you were close to? Nope.
heygeorge ago
Yes. Nothing! Precisely this. The user is then banned from participating based on the whims of a gatekeeper.
Conflation of this concept with the inherent sitewide limitations of user blocking doesn’t change the above.
As for the rest of it, I wasn’t arguing with you (although you seem to want to argue). I was summarizing what I had taken the time to read. You’re not known for being succinct, after all.
I did notice you refer to srayz as ‘an overemotional girl’. Did srayz send you nudes?
Crensch ago
Aww, gee! Look at what it takes to overcome that! You know, versus overcoming the other.
You're going to have to be more clear.
Your summary was pretty much horseshit. Seemed more like a gauntlet thrown down that you're now trying to backpedal on.
Isn't that what you've all been hammering on her for? Triggly, in particular, harping on how srayzie is just a fronthole that couldn't handle the internet because vagina and emotions. But SBBH certainly supported, if not participated in, those attacks on srayzie while giving Triggly a pussy pass.
You were the first pussy with your response about srayzie's SBBH post. Then Triggly had to go and rub her hormone-slit all over a new subverse with hand-crafted CSS of another woman she was hurt by.
Did you guys call her out? Even once?
Nah. (((chosen ones)))
heygeorge ago
Overcoming a ban? What does it take to overcome a ban?
User blocking and subverse moderation are not the same thing. See my reply elsewhere in thread to whatshisname.
Ok, I can tell you want to argue. I have no interest in that ATM.
I don’t recall ‘hammering on srayz for being an overemotional girl’. I did notice you refer to her in precisely that way, as I already said.
I don’t know why you expect me to be personally responsible for the behavior of others.
If this fighting keeps up I’m going to leave the site.
Crensch ago
Really?
I might stumble upon it. Not going to search it out.
Given what you know about me, how could you think your comment wasn't an invitation to engage in fisticuffs?
I still don't understand the significance of me paraphrasing a lot of what you guys have been saying. https://voat.co/v/SoapboxBanhammer/3238002/18794089 https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3251633/18927399
I don't know why you expect others to not hold your group responsible for the actions of its members. Even as a Freudian Slip. Because you define your group as "not a group"? You have shitposters that are held to zero rules, and everyone is supposed to just play along that everything you say is a joke when so many don't keep their "art" of dishonestly and lying within the confines of the subverse.
What method are we to use to determine when someone is being serious or not?
It's going to. I do think you're one of the good ones, but what you stand for currently allowed zyklon to progress unfettered, and almost every action made by those in SBBH was an escalation to absurdity. I'll have nothing to do with a system that rewards such a thing while fettering mods that just want to remove that kind of shit.
Either way, it was a good run.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakening comment by @shit_alt_lmao.
Posted automatically (#44583) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
heygeorge ago
What do you think of the subverse I’m intending to create?
I’ve actually been meaning to get your input on it, but it didn’t seem like the right time. Now does. The only thing I’ve started so far is the sidebar.
v/BigRule
Crensch ago
Fucking love it.