You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

heygeorge ago

To summarize:

  • If someone is sperging and you don’t care for it, you can block them.

  • If a mod banned you from a subverse for whatever reason, you can block yourself from seeing the posts you are not allowed to participate in.

  • These unequal ideas are presented as equivalent.

  • Triggly did not like that srayz shared a private conversation. This means she is an emotional woman.

  • You, Crensch, are no longer an iconoclast [n. A person who attacks cherished beliefs or institutions]

  • Some Qtards are good people.

Am I close? I think I’m close.

Crensch ago

If someone is sperging and you don’t care for it, you can block them.

That's what everyone keeps telling me!

If a mod banned you from a subverse for whatever reason, you can block yourself from seeing the posts you are not allowed to participate in.

Yep!

These unequal ideas are presented as equivalent.

I wasn't going to go there, but you're right!

If the sperg is threatening and spamming and going too far, you can block them, but they can make alts, and ping you, and ping your buddies, and clutter up your posts, and stalk your comments, and ping his buddies to you, and doxx you or spread your self-doxxed photos around trying to REALLY doxx you, or pretending to, but it's OK because it's a joke.

If a subverse bans you, you can remove it from your experience and...??? what happens? Nothing.

You did yourself no favors bringing that up.

Triggly did not like that srayz shared a private conversation. This means she is an emotional woman.

Oh, her retaliation wasn't exactly like srayzie not letting go of when someone attacked her? Right. (((Chosen one))). Oh, wait, do I get to mock you for being cucked by her? Did she send you tit pics to try and hide the fact that she's an overemotional fronthole? Le white knight, heygeorge?

Srayzie made posts. Trigglypuff made a fucking subverse with a CSS altar to someone she was hypocritically attacking for... what?

Overreacting?

Kek. <---

Kek.

Kek.

You, Crensch, are no longer an iconoclast [n. A person who attacks cherished beliefs or institutions]

That you think that shows that you still don't understand what I'm doing.

Some Qtards are good people.

Does this surprise you, or something? They've put up with the mockery like fucking champs, when YOU couldn't handle when an overemotional girl accidentally grouped all of SBBH together as possibly going to attack GA. You whined like a little bitch over that, yet look at what happened? Not only did you prove her right, but you took her mistake like an emotional woman.

How do you square that circle?

Am I close? I think I’m close.

I think you're close to something, but you don't even realize what it is, and the realization of it won't be fun. What you thought you were close to? Nope.

heygeorge ago

subverse bans you, you can remove it from your experience and...??? what happens? Nothing.

Yes. Nothing! Precisely this. The user is then banned from participating based on the whims of a gatekeeper.
Conflation of this concept with the inherent sitewide limitations of user blocking doesn’t change the above.

As for the rest of it, I wasn’t arguing with you (although you seem to want to argue). I was summarizing what I had taken the time to read. You’re not known for being succinct, after all.

I did notice you refer to srayz as ‘an overemotional girl’. Did srayz send you nudes?

Crensch ago

Yes. Nothing! Precisely this. The user is then banned from participating based on the whims of a gatekeeper.

Aww, gee! Look at what it takes to overcome that! You know, versus overcoming the other.

Conflation of this concept with the inherent sitewide limitations of user blocking doesn’t change the above.

You're going to have to be more clear.

As for the rest of it, I wasn’t arguing with you (although you seem to want to argue). I was summarizing what I had taken the time to read. You’re not known for being succinct, after all.

Your summary was pretty much horseshit. Seemed more like a gauntlet thrown down that you're now trying to backpedal on.

I did notice you refer to srayz as ‘an overemotional girl’. Did srayz send you nudes?

Isn't that what you've all been hammering on her for? Triggly, in particular, harping on how srayzie is just a fronthole that couldn't handle the internet because vagina and emotions. But SBBH certainly supported, if not participated in, those attacks on srayzie while giving Triggly a pussy pass.

You were the first pussy with your response about srayzie's SBBH post. Then Triggly had to go and rub her hormone-slit all over a new subverse with hand-crafted CSS of another woman she was hurt by.

Did you guys call her out? Even once?

Nah. (((chosen ones)))

heygeorge ago

Overcoming a ban? What does it take to overcome a ban?

User blocking and subverse moderation are not the same thing. See my reply elsewhere in thread to whatshisname.

Ok, I can tell you want to argue. I have no interest in that ATM.

I don’t recall ‘hammering on srayz for being an overemotional girl’. I did notice you refer to her in precisely that way, as I already said.

I don’t know why you expect me to be personally responsible for the behavior of others.

If this fighting keeps up I’m going to leave the site.

Crensch ago

Overcoming a ban? What does it take to overcome a ban?

Really?

User blocking and subverse moderation are not the same thing. See my reply elsewhere in thread to whatshisname.

I might stumble upon it. Not going to search it out.

Ok, I can tell you want to argue. I have no interest in that ATM.

Given what you know about me, how could you think your comment wasn't an invitation to engage in fisticuffs?

I don’t recall ‘hammering on srayz for being an overemotional girl’. I did notice you refer to her in precisely that way, as I already said.

I still don't understand the significance of me paraphrasing a lot of what you guys have been saying. https://voat.co/v/SoapboxBanhammer/3238002/18794089 https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3251633/18927399

I don’t know why you expect me to be personally responsible for the behavior of others.

I don't know why you expect others to not hold your group responsible for the actions of its members. Even as a Freudian Slip. Because you define your group as "not a group"? You have shitposters that are held to zero rules, and everyone is supposed to just play along that everything you say is a joke when so many don't keep their "art" of dishonestly and lying within the confines of the subverse.

What method are we to use to determine when someone is being serious or not?

If this fighting keeps up I’m going to leave the site.

It's going to. I do think you're one of the good ones, but what you stand for currently allowed zyklon to progress unfettered, and almost every action made by those in SBBH was an escalation to absurdity. I'll have nothing to do with a system that rewards such a thing while fettering mods that just want to remove that kind of shit.

Either way, it was a good run.

SearchVoatBot ago

This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakening comment by @shit_alt_lmao.

Posted automatically (#44583) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

heygeorge ago

What do you think of the subverse I’m intending to create?

I’ve actually been meaning to get your input on it, but it didn’t seem like the right time. Now does. The only thing I’ve started so far is the sidebar.

v/BigRule

Crensch ago

Fucking love it.