This submission was linked from this v/QRV comment by @15847102.

^{Posted automatically (#16699) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

This submission was linked from this v/QRV comment by @15846783.

^{Posted automatically (#16696) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

Didnt Q say eventually we will only have 8chan?

We know Voat is temporary.

Being concerned and suspicious is part of the times that we are in. Nothing wrong with that and it is actually the wisest way to proceed into this battle. For me, for now, this is the site to go to and compare notes and thoughts. Is this new Voat benefactor a good thing or bad thing, well time will tell. We are tiptoeing through a minefield and being cautious, but still moving forward.

There's too many what is's to worry about rather than worry about what ifs.

Are nuts or nervous? Stop jumping at every shadow . Ever think it is a good thing? Try to not see a puzzle where there is none.

Yup, my almonds were activated on the whole thing. I trust PUTT, but we'll see.

Already noted they're lying about a lot of this site proven here /v/QRV/2893439 and below is Putt trying to bury any mention of it in other posts.

Just like on rebbit, it's burred because "they" don't want you to question voat or Putt.

Here's PuttItOut lying about it and giving a bullshit excuse. Anyone that knows how to code knows this is a lie but it's literally the lowest comment in the post.

• /v/whatever/2905678/15514072

We don't log IP, we generate a hash based on a few things and compare those. I'd have to look at the code but I think it's impossible for us to reverse an IP from what we store.

But even this is useless and we will be removing this code when we get around to it.

If you're worried about IP addresses please use a VPN. Actually, always use a VPN.

Also, nice assumptions there, but like usual, wrong.

• /v/whatever/2905678/15514310

We don't log IP, we generate a hash based on a few things and compare those. I'd have to look at the code but I think it's impossible for us to reverse an IP from what we store.

Sorry Put I see no way to believe this. Only thing in common is the IP. Different OS, browser, even LAN, only common thing was the public IP. The accounts were registered months apart and upvote attempts were hours apart. You might hash the IP so it's "cryptic" but still nothing else in common to let a remote system determine it was same user.

If you're worried about IP addresses please use a VPN. Actually, always use a VPN.

I'm not worried about the IP, you inferring this implies you didn't read /v/ideasforvoat/2887109 which suggested you retain the first 3 octets of users IP to identify vote/user farming. I'm more worried about the blatant lying.

Also, nice assumptions there, but like usual, wrong.

Nice of you to have "open source" > 1 year old that has none of the features questioned in the code. Assumptions don't come from verifying someone is lying. You're still just making excuses to cover it up

A bit hung up on cortisol? Make love to your wife, you 'll be better off.

Jews infiltrate everything they can. No reason to suspect that they aren’t coming after voat

havent made up my mind on this as yet, curious to see things unfold.

fact is, we at least doubled the traffic on voat which means huge payment for (safe) server space is required. how to finance?

from my pov, every community should be community funded. if i regularly use a platform someone puts their time, energy, and money into creating and maintaining, in order to provide a space where i can meet and share with others, i happily pay a few bucks per month for it. if 10% of us only paid 1$ per month, financing this space wouldnt be an issue.

having a financier in the picture means loosing independance.

do the goats / @puttitout want to get rid of us? i do think so. although i basically gave up viewing and participating in other voat subs - kindergarden, full of blame+shame on jews/Qtards/boomers/ everyone who is not in alignment with making others responsible for ones own misery -,, when i do take a look, its basically Q-negative.

could it be possible that its a white hat who funds voat now? yes, very possible. it would make sense that the Q team does it.

the opposite is also possible, as OP suggests.

dont have a clear feel on it as yet. but another feel is totally clear - if voat gets rid of Q people, the net will get rid of voat.

Voat and 8ch are now government subsidized.

Do you read what he writes? He wants Q gone from Voat, it's a stain for him that he wants to get rid of.

Trump is dead!

You guys need to change some of your mindset. Stop thinking everything is negative.it is a cancer that rots your brain. Sometimes good things happen and recognize that please open your mind.

Important! Always, always, always find something to worry about. Can't live without it. What is wrong with you?

No, fuck you q faggots anyway nobody really cares. However I will say that I think this is the beginning of the end for voat. Money being injected is bad news because now someone is able to say they own part of it, and as such will force their bidding upon us. It is technically theirs to do so with. Sure sure, that's not what it's about, Putt said so, but this ain't my first rodeo....

I know little about these things, but I have heard some YouTube video talk of the un-censorable blockchain applications, or something like that, is anyone aware of any distributed anonymous discussion forums based on the blockchain that are impervious to censorship and shutdowns?

It isn't the dumbest conspiracy theory posted on here.

Its either THAT...or it was financed by POTUS to allow it to THRIVE and not be CENSORED.

Or the opposite.

That a billionaire good guy wants to save voat in order to save QRV/GA.

It isn't worth worrying about, since nothing can be done.

No. But I am now.