Government released part of the Sealed Indictments charges.
https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/Attachments.pdf
https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/news/standing-order-disclosure-limited-docket-lists-certain-sealed-applications-filed-us-attorneys
^^^^^^^^^^^ UNSEALED INDICTMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^
18 US CODE 1956 -- Money laundering
18 US CODE 1343 -- Wire fraud
21 USC 841(a)(1) -- Narcotics distribution
18 US Code 2252 -- Child Sexual Abuse
21 US Code 2251 -- Sexual exploitation of children
18 US Code 641 -- Public Embezzlement
18 US Code 201 -- Bribery of Public Officials
18 US Code 1349 -- Conspiracy
18 US Code 373 -- Solicitation to commit a crime of violence / murder
18 US Code 471 -- Public securities fraud
18 US Code 1546 -- Identity fraud / VISA Immigration fraud
18 US Code 2339B -- Providing material support for terrorists
18 US Code 922(g) -- Illegal firearms / possession
18 US Code 922(a)(1)(a) -- Illegal firearms / distribution
50 US Code 1705 -- Emergency powers act
18 US Code 371 -- Conspiracy against the USA
18 US Code 201 -- Bribery of public officials
18 US Code 1344 -- Bank fraud
18 US Code 1001 -- Making false statements to a federal agent
22 US Code 2778 -- Arms export violations / arms dealing
view the rest of the comments →
15037375? ago
Lot's of US Code 2703's for Google and Facebook ... Required disclosure of customer communications or records
15042865? ago
These are PR/TT applications. That's pen register and tap and trace. They're an investigative tool where the government asks for log of called numbers or texted numbers. Pen registers allow them to see who you called. Tap and Trace allow them to see who called you. They can't listen to your calls like a real wiretap warrant allows, but unlike a wiretap an pen register doesn't require a warrant because the government is asking the phone company for the records. The phone company is the owner of this records not the caller. So less probable cause is needed for this than a warrant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pen_register
The background to this release is in 2013 national security reporter, Jason Leopold asked for certain sealed court proceedings to be unsealed when the case was closed so he could publish how often these tools were used by the government.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3110174-Jason-Leopold-Pen-Register-Petition.html
In Feb 2018 after a lot of back and forth with the government, the judge gave him a partial victory.
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/leopold-buzz.pdf
None of these are active cases.
None are sealed indictments. Many types of court proceedings are sealed. Indictments only count for a very small number of sealed cases.
15043024? ago
This is Are_We_Sure/Knights of Hubris Shill on PG forums.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2853568/15039759
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2853567/15042779
15043248? ago
Yeah, don't click those links, you'll get shill cooties or something.
Whatever bad thing comes from accurate information you'll definitely be infected with. You don't want accurate information covered in shill cooties do ya?
I mean you're willing to ignore the plain language at the top of the document that clearly says it's a list of docket number for "pen registers and/or trap and trace applications", aren't you? I mean I'd rather be lied to than get Shill Cooties.
I mean he's quoting from the court documents themselves! And linking to the backstory!!
SHILL COOTIES!
The antidote is to keep believing the guy who told you it's a list of sealed indictments related to pizzagate when it's clearly not.