14955659? ago

There was a rumour that jihadis were using game chat and in game assets (bullet holes on walls) to communicate, in my day we used to just draw dicks.

14955296? ago

Did they get the minecraft servers? I once found a spies code book that had pictures of different buildings in mine craft and what they meant.

14955256? ago

Hey y’all whenever I need to chat with my deep state buddies about our evil plans to take over the world I use this super awesome new messenger app called DS talk. It’s on the App Store and google store and it’s free to download!! Check it out! It’s the perfect solution to all your sinister deep state needs, like when you need to offload a slightly used bangladeshian child you recently acquired but got sick of pretty quick, just quickly hit up all your deep state friends with one simple click! It’s that easy! Riggging an election and need to remain in constant contact while remaining undetected by the NSA? No problem? Do you hate how the internet is forever? Not with Ds talk, all chat logs immediately disappear after each message is sent! Where does it go? Who knows!!! Get it now folks!!

But wait there’s more!!

Call now and get our deep state starter kit complete with a new birth certificate with your very own Jew name!!

That’s not all!! With every purchase you will receive a recipe book for begginer cannibals

14953134? ago

As if any comms weren't being recorded and stored.

14952798? ago

I thought about this years ago. Ways to talk over the internet without detection. I figured bullet holes in shooter videogames could spell out messages, and it would be very hard to detect that. Or arranging blocks in Minecraft to spell out a message when viewed from a certain angle. What kind of software monitoring could detect something like that?

14954978? ago

Shhhhhh, you're giving them ideas. Lmao.

14952505? ago

Xbox live went down across the country right when the polls closed for the midterms!

14954554? ago

VERY interesting!

14952372? ago

I knew that was him!

14952383? ago

LOL

14952319? ago

Well for Q to post about it...means they know how the DS does it...because they WATCH / LISTEN IN TO IT!

PSA: There is no fucking VPN, no fucking encryption service (muh Protonmail!), no fucking digital communication method that is NOT COMPROMISED.

That's all.

14952285? ago

Condor is a recent TV show that showed terrorists talking to each other.

Q and whitehats know. Chill.

14953507? ago

Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan on Amazon prime also had PlayStation in game communications used to avoid detection.

14952156? ago

Bullshit. They know all about these comms... w has talked about them mean times. .. why would q mention they at using ____ but then play dumb and not record the exact things he said are being used? Don't be a fucking retarded concernfag.

14952227? ago

Why would Q share recordings from a classified recording publicly.

14953231? ago

Are you retarded? Or do all shills have low IQ... who said q shared recordings? My god, are you faggots even trying any more?

14953282? ago

Lol...

14953299? ago

Lol. See, told ya... you guys aren't even trying any more.

14953356? ago

I feel bad for them. After the storm everyone working for Media Matters and Shareblue will be fired and/or arrested.

14953619? ago

All their shilling for 2 cents per post will be for naught. Soros' money will have dried up since Trump confiscated all the human trafficking funds, and the little bit he quickly moved to private accounts will have been used up fighting a losing battle.... These snowflakes have GOT to be angry, slapping away at their keyboards, trying to stop an avalanche of public awakening... Its futile.... Just stop, go get some chicken tendies and wank off to sleep...

14952149? ago

I was under the impression from Q that the NSA is monitoring and recording ALL forms of communication. Well, maybe not smoke signals and the like, but all forms of communication using 'modern' technology.

14955739? ago

Bill Binney. Everything is/was collected. Bill Binney developed a way to sift through the metadata. He’s a patriot. I hope he’s on the Q team!

14955127? ago

I've had the weird suspicion that the NSA was never the bad guy. Would you have told everyone that the elites are eating babies and watch the nation rip itself apart, or would you work for an organized revolt behind the veil? Someone has to have been watching for a long time. Leftist shit has operated at a loss for years to spread propaganda, who's been keeping RWDS shit up this whole time? Q has shown just how many Patriots have been waiting in the shadows, ready to strike when the time came.

14955336? ago

NSA are on our side. Q is NSA. I researched it here.

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2829632

https://voat.co/v/QRV/2832346

14955082? ago

All about the smoke signals I don’t even have a phone anymore all you need is fire

14954771? ago

So Elizabeth Warren is safe.

14952597? ago

Sure, but because there's so much raw data, one has to do something awfully suspicious in order to collect the gaze of actual people at the NSA. Legal precedent must be satisfied. There's just too much data.

14952943? ago

If you know what your looking for, it's relatively simple to query a database with keywords or whatever advanced technology the NSA uses.

14957592? ago

BILL BINNEY ...

14955199? ago

Oh, you're not wrong. What you're missing is that there's got to be a reason to do it and a general direction to take it in. The NSA is binded in certain ways that other arms of the intelligence apparatus aren't.

14955891? ago

Well if these people are known to the gaze of the NSA, they're probably being tracked on all fronts, even their in game VoIP and the like. Who they're talking to is quickly learned and those people are also tracked.

If you are coming at this point from the "they only ever communicate through game coms so they're not flagged"

Then maybe you're right. But I don't put anything past these organizations. More data means more budget and that's the name of the game. VoIP is easy to intercept and analyze they do it all the time. I can't believe that it accounts for a significant amount of internet traffic relatively speaking.

14952821? ago

^ This.

The Average person doesn't even need to worry about the NSA. They hoard everything, and I mean everything. So it's impossible for human eyes to see it all. Like this Anon just said, "one has to do something awfully suspicious in order to collect the gaze of actual people at the NSA."

Unlike the IC, the NSA is military has an actual job to do that keeps them constantly preoccupied. They don't have time to go snooping around in the Database for your sex tapes and dick pics. So long as we keep the NSA "well weeded" and tighten up some of the "loose ends" in protocol once this is all over that the cabal intentionally loosened, "we the people" have nothing to fear from it, honestly.

It's the intelligence community ABC's that I worry about. They don't exactly have the best track record of giving any fucks about us.

14953165? ago

  • The average person doesn't need to worry about the NSA

  • The NSA hoards every single piece of data out there

Pick one and only one.

I do find it kind of funny that Q and Americans bitch and fucking whine about other countries spying on them, all while they still have the NSA. Pot, meet kettle.

14955333? ago

You're missing the point. Barring tech illogical advances which the public has yet to be made privy of, there's so much raw data sitting in all of these bases in Utah and other places that someone has to have specific intentions with someone that's really made a name for themselves in order to sow through all of the layers of data which more or less conceals your average person.

The NSA most likely has a profile for every US Citizen and we could make the case with ease that that's also simply expanded to likely half the world's population.

What most seem to overlook is that we're at the point with this technology that the east way to conceal one's self is to either fit in or flood the data collection point. That's to say that the sheer amount of data out there makes for easy concealment in that scowering the levels of data in cases like these takes so much time without advanced AI currently being hidden from public eye, should it even exist, that it's hardly ever even worth it.

Just how many people like the special autists on deep chans do you think are out there? How likely is it that any significant number of them exist? From that, how many of them do you think are willing to work with data collection agencies, let alone federal intelligence arms of government? Funny thing is, MILINT has specifically come to these autists for help, which is why we're all here in the first place. These are the only kinds of people that are candidates for such a task, and instead of going after your average Joe, they're being used to take down high profile targets and dismantle world wide corruption agents and organizations.

14963574? ago

The difficulty of parsing the data isn't really the point.

That's like saying "well I commited SO MUCH financial fraud and took the details of SO MANY bank accounts that honestly the odds of me even stealing anything from your bank account is tiny. Why worry lol".

Simple : because it was acquired illegally.

The NSA breached the privacy of every US citizen, and every single citizen worldwide - all while Q, acting presumably as part of them (or a closely related org), bitches like a fucking child about Americans getting spied on.

Is the irony not palpable?

Also worth noting all this 'totally impossible to sort through data' is somewhat easier to store (at least, in partial format), and can then be sifted through later. Also worth noting, the mechanisms to sort and parse the data increase year by year, and the NSA sure as fuck isn't about to give up its tasty little stranglehold on hard coded backdoors and snooper programs.

They're criminals, and hypocrites. That point is really beyond dispute (way, way beyond dispute, outside of brainlet people who can't accept people they like do bad things). So why, exactly, should people not worry about them?

Why would you presume a group willing to break the law, lie about it, and then bitch at others for doing the self-same thing they did (demonstrating a huge lack of self-reflection) shouldn't be worried about?

14965156? ago

If you've gathered that I'm insistent that we shouldn't worry about it, you're entirely wrong. What fucking anon wouldn't worry about privacy?

I was under the impression we were discussing logistics of parsing said data, and actually taking the time to dig through all of it. Do they have AI sorting all of it so it's in organized little trees of info? Fuck no. That's more or less the only point I'm making here.

Even if I did say we shouldn't worry about it, that was utterly untrue.

14965595? ago

Fair enough - it didn't seem the most immediate argument to me in your piece, but I can buy that you'd be concerned about the privacy risks too.

I do mostly agree they don't have a general AI sorting and classifying their data, but with regards to smaller, more specialist systems? I suspect their systems are pretty great, if not approaching the kind of ability that most people might perceive to be those only achievable with "an AI".

My point is not who they're targeting now, it is how they behave, and how they so casually demonstrate their deep seated hypocrisy.

i'm not so sure what your point was, if you began with "you're missing the point", and appear to be finishing here with saying you too believe their invasion of privacy is a huge concern, and they clearly have access to enough data to easily carry out harm on a global scale, unless it's mere quibbling about the precise mechanisms and ability they have to parse their data, which whilst currently somewhat limited are also clearly already so far advanced any kind of quibbling about it feels a bit like debating whether the gun pointed at your head is a 9mm or a 44 magnum.

14966977? ago

Like I said, I thought we were just discussing logistics.

Seems we have nothing to disagree over at this point.

14953400? ago

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Lo9wZsPUiU0/UN6Uc84lyLI/AAAAAAAADgU/Ieq0YTNS334/s1600/why-not-both.jpg

There is no avoiding spying in this day and age. My only concern lies in military secrets and technology. Meddling on the other hand? That is an entirely different ball game. "You can look, but don't touch." ...which I know we do, too. lol But fuck it. I'll own up to it when I say that I don't mind being a hypocrite when it comes to America and our meddling vs others meddling with us.

I really don't have a defense for that position though other than "I don't care, cuz 'Merica!"

14963607? ago

I'll own up to it when I say that I don't mind being a hypocrite when it comes to America and our meddling vs others meddling with us.

I really don't have a defense for that position though other than "I don't care, cuz 'Merica!

At least you're honest. Amusingly enough, that's the same reason I don't really care that others meddled with America (not American). I just hope they're more successful next time.

14953463? ago

Well, you could avoid it to some extent, but it'd be extremely difficult. You'd have to work under the table and pretty much live in the woods with no technology and no footprint.

14954092? ago

At that point I'd have to ask, "Why bother?" lol

"Freedom" comes at a price. However balancing that cost vs the actual freedom itself is tricky, and the lines quickly begin to blur. Greater still as you begin to introduce advanced technology into the equation.

14954091? ago

You couldn't buy anything either without leaving a positive or negative imprint. O n e could deduct where an anomily is not occurring. Process of deduction will point to exactly were it did occur.

14953153? ago

You don't need to look at everything; that's a misnomer. You use datamining algorithms to see if there are any patterns. And if you actually know what you're looking for it's relatively easier.

Moreover, I'm pretty certain that the NSA is on the cutting edge of quantum computing. Depending on how far along they are, no security protocols are safe.

Here's what some tards at Wikipedia wrote:

Quantum computing is computing using quantum-mechanical phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement.[1] A quantum computer is a device that performs quantum computing. Such a computer is different from binary digital electronic computers based on transistors. Whereas common digital computing requires that the data be encoded into binary digits (bits), each of which is always in one of two definite states (0 or 1), quantum computation uses quantum bits or qubits, which can be in superpositions of states. A quantum Turing machine is a theoretical model of such a computer, and is also known as the universal quantum computer. The field of quantum computing was initiated by the work of Paul Benioff[2] and Yuri Manin in 1980,[3] Richard Feynman in 1982,[4] and David Deutsch in 1985.[5]

As of 2018, the development of actual quantum computers is still in its infancy, but experiments have been carried out in which quantum computational operations were executed on a very small number of quantum bits.[6] Both practical and theoretical research continues, and many national governments and military agencies are funding quantum computing research in additional effort to develop quantum computers for civilian, business, trade, environmental and national security purposes, such as cryptanalysis.[7] A small 20-qubit quantum computer exists and is available for experiments via the IBM Quantum Experience project. D-Wave Systems has been developing their own version of a quantum computer that uses annealing.[8]

Large-scale quantum computers would theoretically be able to solve certain problems much more quickly than any classical computers that use even the best currently known algorithms, like integer factorization using Shor's algorithm (which is a quantum algorithm) and the simulation of quantum many-body systems. There exist quantum algorithms, such as Simon's algorithm, that run faster than any possible probabilistic classical algorithm.[9] A classical computer could in principle (with exponential resources) simulate a quantum algorithm, as quantum computation does not violate the Church–Turing thesis.[10]:202 On the other hand, quantum computers may be able to efficiently solve problems which are not practically feasible on classical computers.

14953478? ago

Precisely.

14952315? ago

They do. The Deep State is Tricky. Microsoft (Xbox) and Sony (Playstation) both have their own servers and communication tech. They thought they could get away with it.

14952140? ago

I wouldn't doubt they try to use Steam as well.

14952242? ago

They are. Also through MMORPG and other games as well. You can have private chats and comms in them.

14952123? ago

It's been a tactic for quite awhile. Also, hiding in message boards for video games.

One of the victims in Benghazi, used that method to contact the outside world and ask for help.

14951865? ago

Oh but they WERE detected. Just like the HAM radio operators.