I was under the impression from Q that the NSA is monitoring and recording ALL forms of communication. Well, maybe not smoke signals and the like, but all forms of communication using 'modern' technology.
Sure, but because there's so much raw data, one has to do something awfully suspicious in order to collect the gaze of actual people at the NSA. Legal precedent must be satisfied. There's just too much data.
The Average person doesn't even need to worry about the NSA. They hoard everything, and I mean everything. So it's impossible for human eyes to see it all. Like this Anon just said, "one has to do something awfully suspicious in order to collect the gaze of actual people at the NSA."
Unlike the IC, the NSA is military has an actual job to do that keeps them constantly preoccupied. They don't have time to go snooping around in the Database for your sex tapes and dick pics. So long as we keep the NSA "well weeded" and tighten up some of the "loose ends" in protocol once this is all over that the cabal intentionally loosened, "we the people" have nothing to fear from it, honestly.
It's the intelligence community ABC's that I worry about. They don't exactly have the best track record of giving any fucks about us.
You don't need to look at everything; that's a misnomer. You use datamining algorithms to see if there are any patterns. And if you actually know what you're looking for it's relatively easier.
Moreover, I'm pretty certain that the NSA is on the cutting edge of quantum computing. Depending on how far along they are, no security protocols are safe.
Quantum computing is computing using quantum-mechanical phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement.[1] A quantum computer is a device that performs quantum computing. Such a computer is different from binary digital electronic computers based on transistors. Whereas common digital computing requires that the data be encoded into binary digits (bits), each of which is always in one of two definite states (0 or 1), quantum computation uses quantum bits or qubits, which can be in superpositions of states. A quantum Turing machine is a theoretical model of such a computer, and is also known as the universal quantum computer. The field of quantum computing was initiated by the work of Paul Benioff[2] and Yuri Manin in 1980,[3] Richard Feynman in 1982,[4] and David Deutsch in 1985.[5]
As of 2018, the development of actual quantum computers is still in its infancy, but experiments have been carried out in which quantum computational operations were executed on a very small number of quantum bits.[6] Both practical and theoretical research continues, and many national governments and military agencies are funding quantum computing research in additional effort to develop quantum computers for civilian, business, trade, environmental and national security purposes, such as cryptanalysis.[7] A small 20-qubit quantum computer exists and is available for experiments via the IBM Quantum Experience project. D-Wave Systems has been developing their own version of a quantum computer that uses annealing.[8]
Large-scale quantum computers would theoretically be able to solve certain problems much more quickly than any classical computers that use even the best currently known algorithms, like integer factorization using Shor's algorithm (which is a quantum algorithm) and the simulation of quantum many-body systems. There exist quantum algorithms, such as Simon's algorithm, that run faster than any possible probabilistic classical algorithm.[9] A classical computer could in principle (with exponential resources) simulate a quantum algorithm, as quantum computation does not violate the Church–Turing thesis.[10]:202 On the other hand, quantum computers may be able to efficiently solve problems which are not practically feasible on classical computers.
view the rest of the comments →
14952149? ago
I was under the impression from Q that the NSA is monitoring and recording ALL forms of communication. Well, maybe not smoke signals and the like, but all forms of communication using 'modern' technology.
14952597? ago
Sure, but because there's so much raw data, one has to do something awfully suspicious in order to collect the gaze of actual people at the NSA. Legal precedent must be satisfied. There's just too much data.
14952821? ago
^ This.
The Average person doesn't even need to worry about the NSA. They hoard everything, and I mean everything. So it's impossible for human eyes to see it all. Like this Anon just said, "one has to do something awfully suspicious in order to collect the gaze of actual people at the NSA."
Unlike the IC, the NSA is military has an actual job to do that keeps them constantly preoccupied. They don't have time to go snooping around in the Database for your sex tapes and dick pics. So long as we keep the NSA "well weeded" and tighten up some of the "loose ends" in protocol once this is all over that the cabal intentionally loosened, "we the people" have nothing to fear from it, honestly.
It's the intelligence community ABC's that I worry about. They don't exactly have the best track record of giving any fucks about us.
14953153? ago
You don't need to look at everything; that's a misnomer. You use datamining algorithms to see if there are any patterns. And if you actually know what you're looking for it's relatively easier.
Moreover, I'm pretty certain that the NSA is on the cutting edge of quantum computing. Depending on how far along they are, no security protocols are safe.
Here's what some tards at Wikipedia wrote:
Quantum computing is computing using quantum-mechanical phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement.[1] A quantum computer is a device that performs quantum computing. Such a computer is different from binary digital electronic computers based on transistors. Whereas common digital computing requires that the data be encoded into binary digits (bits), each of which is always in one of two definite states (0 or 1), quantum computation uses quantum bits or qubits, which can be in superpositions of states. A quantum Turing machine is a theoretical model of such a computer, and is also known as the universal quantum computer. The field of quantum computing was initiated by the work of Paul Benioff[2] and Yuri Manin in 1980,[3] Richard Feynman in 1982,[4] and David Deutsch in 1985.[5]
As of 2018, the development of actual quantum computers is still in its infancy, but experiments have been carried out in which quantum computational operations were executed on a very small number of quantum bits.[6] Both practical and theoretical research continues, and many national governments and military agencies are funding quantum computing research in additional effort to develop quantum computers for civilian, business, trade, environmental and national security purposes, such as cryptanalysis.[7] A small 20-qubit quantum computer exists and is available for experiments via the IBM Quantum Experience project. D-Wave Systems has been developing their own version of a quantum computer that uses annealing.[8]
Large-scale quantum computers would theoretically be able to solve certain problems much more quickly than any classical computers that use even the best currently known algorithms, like integer factorization using Shor's algorithm (which is a quantum algorithm) and the simulation of quantum many-body systems. There exist quantum algorithms, such as Simon's algorithm, that run faster than any possible probabilistic classical algorithm.[9] A classical computer could in principle (with exponential resources) simulate a quantum algorithm, as quantum computation does not violate the Church–Turing thesis.[10]:202 On the other hand, quantum computers may be able to efficiently solve problems which are not practically feasible on classical computers.
14953478? ago
Precisely.