At the time I made that submission, on 4/21, "cache outage" had not been named as the reason Voat was down. I believe @Peaceseeker also found @Atko's coyness somewhat curious at the time (see the last link from this excerpt of my submission, below, also made on 4/21):
That submission was something of a follow up to this one I made four months prior. I stickied a post by Peaceseeker discussing Putt's comments about the extended DDoS attacks Voat endured during the fall of 2017, for the encouragement of those investigating globalist corruption in our subverse.
Looking back, I find it interesting those attacks happened during the same period QAnon first started leaking information and we started covering it on v/pizzagate.
Thats great and all (from your link) that Q replied to some anon about why Voat was down, but that was inaccurate and untrue.
So I’m not sure why you are repeating that outside of convenience re: the image you would like to paint.
Yes, Putt has since said it was a cache overflow. But I'm not positive that make's QAnon's implication untrue. I don't know enough about the technical side of how these things work to confidently say that the heavy traffic involved with the research and Qdrops that occurred immediately prior to the "cache outage" were not part of the cause of the outage itself. It seemed pretty logical to me that it was. If I recall correctly, there were something like a quarter of million people accessing 8chan that night, and I and many others were dropping numerous links to our v/pizzagate research archives and showing people there how to search Voat. We are the #1 source of research for them on anything relating to the pedo elite.
Also, I have to say that it's hard to take Voat "free speech" seriously when every word I say is immediately labeled as "pushing a narrative" "for convenience." I am sharing my perspective in good faith about what I have seen over the past two years. You can agree or disagree; I may well be completely wrong. I don't claim to be right. But trying to make it sound like I have some ulterior agenda is really shitty.
Tying the demise of srayzie to a technical issue falsely insinuated by Q to be an attack is what I was getting at with my talk with painting an image.
Srayzie was targeted the minute she started standing up to trolls. Mostly, they just sniped. The serious harassment began when she refused to cooperate with the guy from the Reddit Q board and then when she started to expose the compromised mods there working in conjunction with Neon. That's when the fishing for anyone who could recognize her picture began. She reported that to Twitter and the account was deleted back in January. When she publicized what was happening, everything quieted down -- at least in terms of the fishing expeditions for her identity.
It didn't spring back up -- with new pictures and calls for "Do you know this missing woman?" -- until she exposed the questionable actions of QRV moderators and the trolling of QRV and tried to ask people she thought were her friends to stop. She erroneously assumed most goats would want maximum eyeballs on research exposing ((globalist)) corruption as the FISA declassification unfolds.
Instead, she ended up under 24 hour attack, with more and more pictures posted. Since a few were actually of her, her family became concerned the fishing expedition might eventually turn up someone who knew her RL identity. So, like abortionburger before her who published about the boy who reported being raped by Alefantis' at Comet, she had no choice but to leave. In the case of abortionburger, Putt simply site-banned all the accounts posting about her RL identity, which they had gleaned from her 10 year Reddit history. She lasted about a month after that under a new account, but finally left when she received messages that proved people were monitoring her coming and going from her home with her six year old. They left her alone the minute she left Voat.
The only other case I've heard of on Voat remotely similar to what happened to srayzie and AB is She, which was before my time. But as I understand it, that was a case where a Reddity user who didn't want to assimilate was actually trying to change the culture of Voat, not a case of a brave woman gratefully making full use of Voat free speech to expose elite child rapists connected to Hillary Clinton.
So yeah, from my point of view, having known both abortionburger and srayzie very, very well, I tend to think the attacks against them are part of the larger pattern of interference with Voat.
It has been obvious to me for years that Voat has powerful protectors as well as powerful enemies. Putt is a single point of failure. IMO there's no way we would still be here discussing free speech and documenting the fraud that was perpetrated post WWI and WWII and the disgusting perversion of culture, medicine, religion and everything else that has been forced on us since -- the appalling sins of the most powerful, filthy rich, technologically equipped people in the world -- if Putt and Voat weren't being kept safe by someone. I see the DDoS, the cache overflow, the spam bots that target pizzagate and GA, the consensus crackers and concern trolls and the attacks against srayzie, me and several others as most likely part of the same effort to hinder the spread of our corruption research and the Holocaust fraud evidence compiled by goats before us.
There are people here who want to thwart that. So I am watching the patterns of who does and says what, how that matches up against what I personally know to be true, and I am gathering evidence.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
Moderated a subverse exposing globalist corruption -- the same topic that likely got Voat DDoSed and financially deplatformed. Hard to believe this is so mysterious.
heygeorge ago
Thats great and all (from your link) that Q replied to some anon about why Voat was down, but that was inaccurate and untrue.
So I’m not sure why you are repeating that outside of convenience re: the image you would like to paint.
Vindicator ago
You think Voat got "state level" DDoSed because of FPH and v/niggers?
heygeorge ago
Your link is about the cache outage, which Q seemingly found it advantageous to ‘take credit’ for.
@crensch
Vindicator ago
At the time I made that submission, on 4/21, "cache outage" had not been named as the reason Voat was down. I believe @Peaceseeker also found @Atko's coyness somewhat curious at the time (see the last link from this excerpt of my submission, below, also made on 4/21):
That submission was something of a follow up to this one I made four months prior. I stickied a post by Peaceseeker discussing Putt's comments about the extended DDoS attacks Voat endured during the fall of 2017, for the encouragement of those investigating globalist corruption in our subverse.
Looking back, I find it interesting those attacks happened during the same period QAnon first started leaking information and we started covering it on v/pizzagate.
Yes, Putt has since said it was a cache overflow. But I'm not positive that make's QAnon's implication untrue. I don't know enough about the technical side of how these things work to confidently say that the heavy traffic involved with the research and Qdrops that occurred immediately prior to the "cache outage" were not part of the cause of the outage itself. It seemed pretty logical to me that it was. If I recall correctly, there were something like a quarter of million people accessing 8chan that night, and I and many others were dropping numerous links to our v/pizzagate research archives and showing people there how to search Voat. We are the #1 source of research for them on anything relating to the pedo elite.
Also, I have to say that it's hard to take Voat "free speech" seriously when every word I say is immediately labeled as "pushing a narrative" "for convenience." I am sharing my perspective in good faith about what I have seen over the past two years. You can agree or disagree; I may well be completely wrong. I don't claim to be right. But trying to make it sound like I have some ulterior agenda is really shitty.
argosciv ago
I hate to be a pain, but can you do me a huge favor and timeline the events in another comment?
Might be helpful either in this conversation or down the track.
heygeorge ago
Thank you for the response. Everyone here with something to say tends to catch a lot of heat. I am very well aware of this.
Tying the demise of srayzie to a technical issue falsely insinuated by Q to be an attack is what I was getting at with my talk with painting an image.
It sucks srayz deleted. It sucks how that came about. Clamping down on subverses with subjective moderation as a result is not a good outcome.
Vindicator ago
Srayzie was targeted the minute she started standing up to trolls. Mostly, they just sniped. The serious harassment began when she refused to cooperate with the guy from the Reddit Q board and then when she started to expose the compromised mods there working in conjunction with Neon. That's when the fishing for anyone who could recognize her picture began. She reported that to Twitter and the account was deleted back in January. When she publicized what was happening, everything quieted down -- at least in terms of the fishing expeditions for her identity.
It didn't spring back up -- with new pictures and calls for "Do you know this missing woman?" -- until she exposed the questionable actions of QRV moderators and the trolling of QRV and tried to ask people she thought were her friends to stop. She erroneously assumed most goats would want maximum eyeballs on research exposing ((globalist)) corruption as the FISA declassification unfolds.
Instead, she ended up under 24 hour attack, with more and more pictures posted. Since a few were actually of her, her family became concerned the fishing expedition might eventually turn up someone who knew her RL identity. So, like abortionburger before her who published about the boy who reported being raped by Alefantis' at Comet, she had no choice but to leave. In the case of abortionburger, Putt simply site-banned all the accounts posting about her RL identity, which they had gleaned from her 10 year Reddit history. She lasted about a month after that under a new account, but finally left when she received messages that proved people were monitoring her coming and going from her home with her six year old. They left her alone the minute she left Voat.
The only other case I've heard of on Voat remotely similar to what happened to srayzie and AB is She, which was before my time. But as I understand it, that was a case where a Reddity user who didn't want to assimilate was actually trying to change the culture of Voat, not a case of a brave woman gratefully making full use of Voat free speech to expose elite child rapists connected to Hillary Clinton.
So yeah, from my point of view, having known both abortionburger and srayzie very, very well, I tend to think the attacks against them are part of the larger pattern of interference with Voat.
It has been obvious to me for years that Voat has powerful protectors as well as powerful enemies. Putt is a single point of failure. IMO there's no way we would still be here discussing free speech and documenting the fraud that was perpetrated post WWI and WWII and the disgusting perversion of culture, medicine, religion and everything else that has been forced on us since -- the appalling sins of the most powerful, filthy rich, technologically equipped people in the world -- if Putt and Voat weren't being kept safe by someone. I see the DDoS, the cache overflow, the spam bots that target pizzagate and GA, the consensus crackers and concern trolls and the attacks against srayzie, me and several others as most likely part of the same effort to hinder the spread of our corruption research and the Holocaust fraud evidence compiled by goats before us.
There are people here who want to thwart that. So I am watching the patterns of who does and says what, how that matches up against what I personally know to be true, and I am gathering evidence.