You seem to have some sad personal problem with 'shaming' don't you? You sound like the SJWs people love to hate around here.

How about you harden up? In a place of free speech, users should be more than capable of dealing with people who are trying to 'shame' them. You certainly have no qualms trying to shame the people you view as enemies in your sad, paranoid personal universe.

Some (many) people have opinions that differ from yours, and they think you're pathetic. How about you just deal with it and respond in person rather than continually throwing little SRS hissy-fits?

Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because many users are unpopular here and have less than 100 CCP, we are temporarily banned as soon as we make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech, but I'm grateful for recent comments stating an intention to improve things.

They really do seem to have a very specific way of identifying themselves to those that know what to look for. All it takes from there is a little digging.

He's one of the few Jews that outright said he wasn't Jewish, but I don't think I believe him anyway.

Maybe it's just me, but that's nail-in-coffin material for this faggot. I couldn't help but think he was playing the long-con kike game, and it looks like that's the case.

He's not just liberal, he's bought into the equality/multicultural bullshit that is pure kikery.

What's your take on it?

Thanks for the plug to v/thepath!

Wow, this doesn't seem biased at all.

A big problem I’ve found in outing paid shills is that there is very, very rarely any difference between actually paid professional shills and ‘just a liberal’. Liberals WILL NOT substantiate their claims. Ever. They just don’t do it. We’ve gotten to the point where you have to be extremely careful about what you say to a liberal even in the beginning, because otherwise they won’t even ENUMERATE their own claims. That’s right: a liberal will REFUSE to even state what he believes because there’s some tiny little part of him that KNOWS–deep down–that he’s wrong. But “wrong” does not exist to a liberal, and certainly a viewpoint which is liberal could never be “wrong”. How do we know this?

Liberals have a new wish every time their latest wish is granted. Conservatives should make them spell out their principles and ideals. Instead of doing this, conservatives allow liberals to pursue incremental goals without revealing their ultimate destination. So, thanks to the negligence of their opponents, liberals control the terms of every debate by always demanding ‘more’ while never defining ‘enough.’ The predictable result is that they always get more, and it's never enough. – Joseph Sobran

Since a liberal viewpoint could never be “wrong”, to so much as LIST the things he believes opens them up to scrutiny. And how DARE you scrutinize a liberal! How do we know this? Their masters say so.

Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of Israel on trial. – Ariel Sharon

Under scrutiny, a belief may be found to be “wrong” in a way that even a liberal can’t ignore. Oh, sure, he could–AND WILL–keep repeating said belief LONG after it is proven wrong. But the responses he will get after being proven wrong differ from those from before. The responses after cause him to have emotions. Bad ones. They make him feel like he might not be the bastion of moral superiority he knows he is. The responses aren’t what he wants. So the emotion he feels is bad. But bad emotions are bad; the things that cause them are bad. Therefore being told he is wrong–which causes bad emotions–is bad, therefore he avoids being told he is wrong by never saying what he believes (so he can never be scrutinized and proven wrong), therefore he is never wrong. “I AM LIBERAL, HEAR ME SHAME!”

I am sharing my opinion

I’ll restate here that liberals do not believe that truth exists, therefore all opinions are valid, therefore he’s indignant that anyone would ever be questioning what he has said (because it’s true–because ‘wrong’ doesn’t exist to him; please see the above for the “rationale” on his part).

and you have a problem with it.

Whenever you see a liberal say this, you need to understand it as, “I have a problem with your questioning of what I have said, because what I said is the word of god.” REMINDER: LIBERALS ACCUSE YOU OF WHAT THEY ARE DOING TO YOU.

Who's subverting who now?

He is, to us. Pathetic.

You're overthinking it. He isn't shaming anyone, just venting. Some people don't have the capacity to handle politics all day long. Especially when they feel powerless to stop the bullshit of this world. Another thing is that some people are black pillers and no longer believe in governments and political solutions. I'm one of them as you can see from my comment in that thread.

One problem of voat is that people come here for political discussions because they get censored elsewhere, but when its time to talk cars, bikes, guns, travel, sex, video games, wrenching, etc, they run back to reddit because they don't get enough upvotes in small subs here. And that's fucking gay.

The escape the rat race comic is laughable. Like we'll all be happier sitting around naked in mud huts. I think they tried that in Apefrica.

yeah i definitely misjudged him. i thought he was just some harmless naive hippie. nope, he's a fucking degenerate kike that needs to be holocausted with extreme prejudice. "the whole burnt offering". you hear me @middle_path? that's going to be you motherfucker.

@Tallest_Skil @Scjreober @con77 @Obama_BinLadin @Inaminit

@CapinBoredface @Dr_No @KeksMex @AndrewBlazelt @goatboy

it kinda is obsessive. voat is a general topic website yet 50% of the topics are about jews do this jews do that. its annoying.

@GetWithThePogrom @Gorillion @ExpertShitposter @Optick @1Sorry_SOB

@kevdude @disappointed @Pres_Jack_Tunney @jewshekelstein1488 @Shekelstein6M