You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

talmoridor-x ago

You don't "debunk" anything here, retard. Nothing but ad-hominem arguments. Although it's safe to be wary of ex-NSA and jesuits, you should directly refute their central point ("Q is intentionally cryptic and misleading").

srayzie ago

Not only should those freaks not be trusted, they provided NO evidence. Not only that, they were asked for it and said they “WON’T SAY.”

I made a comment here, showing that his other post was debunked as well, and he even deleted it after making excuses that he posted the “wrong one.”

talmoridor-x ago

Not a direct refutation. They weren't trying to prove anything, only argue a possibility. Why are they wrong? Keep it impersonal.

srayzie ago

This is what a bunch of people spread everywhere to prove that Q is a psyop. This needed to be done.

talmoridor-x ago

Oh, okay.