Is this pic all the evidence you need to declare a person a pedo, @theoldones ?
I just noted some of what I think are legal hurdles and suggested that @theoldones move to get a petition to change the rules of voat.
Now, we see the age of 18 to be the age that @theoldone arbitrarily choose ... any pics of girls (he thinks, not that he knows) under 18 shown are automatic pedos for those looking at such pics.
Even if a husband of 16 is looking at a pic of his wife who is also 16 (in USA, many states allow 16 year olds to marry).
You know, before I would call someone a pedo I would have actual evidence of such instead of coming to quick conclusions completely devoid of facts related to all the elements.
Its a lack of knowldge on the subject matter.
Feelings. That's what counts.
And now @theoldones creates a new "crime" - pedo accomplice. Sweet...of course anyone who does not complain is complicit. Hence also a pedo accomplice. That's everyone but @theoldones I guess ...
Posted automatically (#50277) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thelma: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Maggotbait88)
Guy sees the pic and then feels compelled to harass the OP ... its fine , its free speech, nothing major...but it raises ??? ...which I ask and am awaiting a response.
But really, any response is going to lead to a bad light being shown by the first commentor. Clearly it gives the appearance that he has some level if sexual excitement from the photo, otherwise he would not have posted at all -- or it just shows that his complaints are mostly merit-less. I think the latter ... but not 100% sure...just guessing.
I know its not popular to defend free speech. Your post examples this.
Posted automatically (#50280) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thelma: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @DANKE_ST_GHIDORAH)
OP posts those pics for a reason. Why are you going after the one that you think “could be” excited over that image, instead of the one that clearly is?
Clearly it gives the appearance that he has some level if sexual excitement from the photo
I don’t see that at all. If he were excited by it, he wouldn’t be bringing attention to it. He clearly doesn’t like children or teens pictures being used in a sexual manor. How is that hard for you to see?
I've been very lenient. I did suggest he put together a petition for a change in voat rules so people could look and decide. However, he cannot even identify what characteristics he thinks offends him. That's when you know he has zero knowledge on the subject matter and just posts based on his feelings like liberals do.
Showing me he does not really care about free speech at all.
But that's what voat is all about.
He should go somewhere else IMO. Voat is not a suitable forum for him.
I think that is just one pic out of many he could have chosen. You realize that people that fight pedos could be past victims? People that defend pedos can also be past victims.
I just think it’s odd to attack someone that is clearly upset over seeing someone normalizing child porn. You seem to defend the one posting this stuff over someone that is bothered by it. Why?
Voat has rules concerning this...read the user agreement.
This is not a pedo issue...its a free speech issue.
As I see it.
Just pointed out one of the latest posts of these anti-pedos. Of course prior to that they started attacking everyone but themselves on voat.
I'll defend free speech. Sure. Always have.
What normally happens in the real world when supporting/exercising free speech? Get called Nazi...cops get 2" from me...people lie about encounters..death threats ...etc.
Here its hard to threaten, being the internet and all ...calling a person a Nazi on voat? LOL ...and they cannot send a cop to get 2" into my face. So what is left? Calling me other names other than being a Nazi is about it.
Voat has rules concerning this...read the user agreement.
This is not a pedo issue...its a free speech issue.
Just pointed out one of the latest posts of these anti-pedos. Of course prior to that a person started attacking everyone but themselves on voat.
Of all things you could be defending, you defend this? I think the Perv OP is a big boy and can defend himself. No? theoldones is entitled to his opinion as well.
I'll defend free speech. Sure. Always have.
What normally happens in the real world when supporting/exercising free speech? Get called Nazi...cops get 2" from me...people lie about encounters..death threats ...etc.
Here its hard to threaten, being the internet and all ...calling a person a Nazi on voat? LOL ...and they cannot send a cop to get 2" into my face. So what is left? Calling me other names other than being a Nazi is about it.
I think this is a sensitive topic and that maybe you should ask yourself why some people may be more bothered than others by seeing things like this. Instead of attacking the person, maybe show some compassion. I’m not even being rude to you. Maybe you’re a victim. I don’t know. @theoldones seems like someone with good intentions.
There are many many goats ... why some people are bothered? I cannot say but its a numbers game ... but look at the numbers. Prove to me that people feel a need to limit free speech ? 'cause I don't see it.
Or, do as I suggested and get a petition going for the purpose of changing the rules on voat. I think its good timing to as I think Putt has reflected about looking and considering rule changes recently.
But there won't be any petition, will there? Why? Because it will show that most agree to protect free speech and that the current rules are adequate.
Well, I'm waiting. Calling me names has no affect. I've had much worse defending free speech issues (usually showing gov't corruption which you can imaging infuriates not only government agents but also supporters of those who are corrupt).
I think “free speech” is used by you enablers too much. Anyway, I’m just saying that I find it strange that you’re on a free speech forum and going after someone exercising their free speech. Who and what you are defending says something about you. You clearly have issues.
view the rest of the comments →
thelma ago
I'm beginning to think that people posts pics just to cause some to go crazy.
https://files.catbox.moe/xif590.jpg
Is this pic all the evidence you need to declare a person a pedo, @theoldones ?
I just noted some of what I think are legal hurdles and suggested that @theoldones move to get a petition to change the rules of voat.
Now, we see the age of 18 to be the age that @theoldone arbitrarily choose ... any pics of girls (he thinks, not that he knows) under 18 shown are automatic pedos for those looking at such pics.
Even if a husband of 16 is looking at a pic of his wife who is also 16 (in USA, many states allow 16 year olds to marry).
You know, before I would call someone a pedo I would have actual evidence of such instead of coming to quick conclusions completely devoid of facts related to all the elements.
Its a lack of knowldge on the subject matter.
Feelings. That's what counts.
And now @theoldones creates a new "crime" - pedo accomplice. Sweet...of course anyone who does not complain is complicit. Hence also a pedo accomplice. That's everyone but @theoldones I guess ...
Kudos. You just outted yourself as a wack-job.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat comment by @Maggotbait88.
Posted automatically (#50277) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thelma: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Maggotbait88)
Dortex ago
Hey now, Thelma. I suggest you stop that before you get served for all that libel.
theoldones ago
rule 0: no pedos
heygeorge ago
You haven’t been following along
InSaneGoatPosse ago
You seem like a pedophile enabler @Thelma. You a dude?
thelma ago
I'm not.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
If free speech is sexualizing children, then I’m not free speech.
thelma ago
Well, what does the Voat rules say about that ?
One cannot post a sexualization of a child pic.
So you're not actually talking about that, are you ?
InSaneGoatPosse ago
The Wild West clearly needs work
thelma ago
Have you seen this post/thread?
https://voat.co/v/youngladies/3294393
Guy sees the pic and then feels compelled to harass the OP ... its fine , its free speech, nothing major...but it raises ??? ...which I ask and am awaiting a response.
But really, any response is going to lead to a bad light being shown by the first commentor. Clearly it gives the appearance that he has some level if sexual excitement from the photo, otherwise he would not have posted at all -- or it just shows that his complaints are mostly merit-less. I think the latter ... but not 100% sure...just guessing.
I know its not popular to defend free speech. Your post examples this.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat comment by @DANKE_ST_GHIDORAH.
Posted automatically (#50280) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thelma: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @DANKE_ST_GHIDORAH)
InSaneGoatPosse ago
You felt compelled to harass @theoldones.
OP posts those pics for a reason. Why are you going after the one that you think “could be” excited over that image, instead of the one that clearly is?
HollaKost ago
It's pretty typical for this gayng to pick and choose when voice their faux outrage. Zero consistency!
InSaneGoatPosse ago
Trufe
thelma ago
https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=uIxBmyRQlwQ
Free speech ... love it or leave
InSaneGoatPosse ago
I don’t see that at all. If he were excited by it, he wouldn’t be bringing attention to it. He clearly doesn’t like children or teens pictures being used in a sexual manor. How is that hard for you to see?
thelma ago
You are a mind reader ?
Only he can answer the question.
But I'll agree that you do not feel excited about the pic at all too.
thelma ago
Attacker of free speech.
I've been very lenient. I did suggest he put together a petition for a change in voat rules so people could look and decide. However, he cannot even identify what characteristics he thinks offends him. That's when you know he has zero knowledge on the subject matter and just posts based on his feelings like liberals do.
Showing me he does not really care about free speech at all.
But that's what voat is all about.
He should go somewhere else IMO. Voat is not a suitable forum for him.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
You’re either a victim or a pedo. Sad. 28 days left or what?
thelma ago
What evidence do you have?
Show it. Wait, you have none. Why? Because you're a wacko.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
I’m the wacko? Who’s being a pedo enabler? I think you’re a disturbed man Thelma. Get help.
Proveitorloseit ago
Thelma isn't a man. You're moronic
InSaneGoatPosse ago
I think that is just one pic out of many he could have chosen. You realize that people that fight pedos could be past victims? People that defend pedos can also be past victims.
I just think it’s odd to attack someone that is clearly upset over seeing someone normalizing child porn. You seem to defend the one posting this stuff over someone that is bothered by it. Why?
thelma ago
Free speech.
Voat has rules concerning this...read the user agreement.
This is not a pedo issue...its a free speech issue.
As I see it.
Just pointed out one of the latest posts of these anti-pedos. Of course prior to that they started attacking everyone but themselves on voat.
I'll defend free speech. Sure. Always have.
What normally happens in the real world when supporting/exercising free speech? Get called Nazi...cops get 2" from me...people lie about encounters..death threats ...etc.
Here its hard to threaten, being the internet and all ...calling a person a Nazi on voat? LOL ...and they cannot send a cop to get 2" into my face. So what is left? Calling me other names other than being a Nazi is about it.
Ouch. It hurts. This little.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
Of all things you could be defending, you defend this? I think the Perv OP is a big boy and can defend himself. No? theoldones is entitled to his opinion as well.
I think this is a sensitive topic and that maybe you should ask yourself why some people may be more bothered than others by seeing things like this. Instead of attacking the person, maybe show some compassion. I’m not even being rude to you. Maybe you’re a victim. I don’t know. @theoldones seems like someone with good intentions.
thelma ago
Hell is paved with the stones of good intentions.
Its a simple issue really...boils down to this:
1) either support free speech
2) or you dont
And if #2 -- why the hell you on voat ?
There are many many goats ... why some people are bothered? I cannot say but its a numbers game ... but look at the numbers. Prove to me that people feel a need to limit free speech ? 'cause I don't see it.
Or, do as I suggested and get a petition going for the purpose of changing the rules on voat. I think its good timing to as I think Putt has reflected about looking and considering rule changes recently.
But there won't be any petition, will there? Why? Because it will show that most agree to protect free speech and that the current rules are adequate.
Well, I'm waiting. Calling me names has no affect. I've had much worse defending free speech issues (usually showing gov't corruption which you can imaging infuriates not only government agents but also supporters of those who are corrupt).
InSaneGoatPosse ago
I think “free speech” is used by you enablers too much. Anyway, I’m just saying that I find it strange that you’re on a free speech forum and going after someone exercising their free speech. Who and what you are defending says something about you. You clearly have issues.
thelma ago
I guess free speech is one of those rights you willingly toss into the trash. Like many other rights you refuse to exercise due to "social anxiety".
InSaneGoatPosse ago
You can use “free speech” to argue anything. Why don’t you let the Pedos defend themselves?
theoldones ago