Is this pic all the evidence you need to declare a person a pedo, @theoldones ?
I just noted some of what I think are legal hurdles and suggested that @theoldones move to get a petition to change the rules of voat.
Now, we see the age of 18 to be the age that @theoldone arbitrarily choose ... any pics of girls (he thinks, not that he knows) under 18 shown are automatic pedos for those looking at such pics.
Even if a husband of 16 is looking at a pic of his wife who is also 16 (in USA, many states allow 16 year olds to marry).
You know, before I would call someone a pedo I would have actual evidence of such instead of coming to quick conclusions completely devoid of facts related to all the elements.
Its a lack of knowldge on the subject matter.
Feelings. That's what counts.
And now @theoldones creates a new "crime" - pedo accomplice. Sweet...of course anyone who does not complain is complicit. Hence also a pedo accomplice. That's everyone but @theoldones I guess ...
Guy sees the pic and then feels compelled to harass the OP ... its fine , its free speech, nothing major...but it raises ??? ...which I ask and am awaiting a response.
But really, any response is going to lead to a bad light being shown by the first commentor. Clearly it gives the appearance that he has some level if sexual excitement from the photo, otherwise he would not have posted at all -- or it just shows that his complaints are mostly merit-less. I think the latter ... but not 100% sure...just guessing.
I know its not popular to defend free speech. Your post examples this.
Clearly it gives the appearance that he has some level if sexual excitement from the photo
I don’t see that at all. If he were excited by it, he wouldn’t be bringing attention to it. He clearly doesn’t like children or teens pictures being used in a sexual manor. How is that hard for you to see?
I've been very lenient. I did suggest he put together a petition for a change in voat rules so people could look and decide. However, he cannot even identify what characteristics he thinks offends him. That's when you know he has zero knowledge on the subject matter and just posts based on his feelings like liberals do.
Showing me he does not really care about free speech at all.
But that's what voat is all about.
He should go somewhere else IMO. Voat is not a suitable forum for him.
view the rest of the comments →
thelma ago
I'm beginning to think that people posts pics just to cause some to go crazy.
https://files.catbox.moe/xif590.jpg
Is this pic all the evidence you need to declare a person a pedo, @theoldones ?
I just noted some of what I think are legal hurdles and suggested that @theoldones move to get a petition to change the rules of voat.
Now, we see the age of 18 to be the age that @theoldone arbitrarily choose ... any pics of girls (he thinks, not that he knows) under 18 shown are automatic pedos for those looking at such pics.
Even if a husband of 16 is looking at a pic of his wife who is also 16 (in USA, many states allow 16 year olds to marry).
You know, before I would call someone a pedo I would have actual evidence of such instead of coming to quick conclusions completely devoid of facts related to all the elements.
Its a lack of knowldge on the subject matter.
Feelings. That's what counts.
And now @theoldones creates a new "crime" - pedo accomplice. Sweet...of course anyone who does not complain is complicit. Hence also a pedo accomplice. That's everyone but @theoldones I guess ...
Kudos. You just outted yourself as a wack-job.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
You seem like a pedophile enabler @Thelma. You a dude?
thelma ago
Have you seen this post/thread?
https://voat.co/v/youngladies/3294393
Guy sees the pic and then feels compelled to harass the OP ... its fine , its free speech, nothing major...but it raises ??? ...which I ask and am awaiting a response.
But really, any response is going to lead to a bad light being shown by the first commentor. Clearly it gives the appearance that he has some level if sexual excitement from the photo, otherwise he would not have posted at all -- or it just shows that his complaints are mostly merit-less. I think the latter ... but not 100% sure...just guessing.
I know its not popular to defend free speech. Your post examples this.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
I don’t see that at all. If he were excited by it, he wouldn’t be bringing attention to it. He clearly doesn’t like children or teens pictures being used in a sexual manor. How is that hard for you to see?
thelma ago
Attacker of free speech.
I've been very lenient. I did suggest he put together a petition for a change in voat rules so people could look and decide. However, he cannot even identify what characteristics he thinks offends him. That's when you know he has zero knowledge on the subject matter and just posts based on his feelings like liberals do.
Showing me he does not really care about free speech at all.
But that's what voat is all about.
He should go somewhere else IMO. Voat is not a suitable forum for him.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
You’re either a victim or a pedo. Sad. 28 days left or what?
thelma ago
What evidence do you have?
Show it. Wait, you have none. Why? Because you're a wacko.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
I’m the wacko? Who’s being a pedo enabler? I think you’re a disturbed man Thelma. Get help.
Proveitorloseit ago
Thelma isn't a man. You're moronic