Is this pic all the evidence you need to declare a person a pedo, @theoldones ?
I just noted some of what I think are legal hurdles and suggested that @theoldones move to get a petition to change the rules of voat.
Now, we see the age of 18 to be the age that @theoldone arbitrarily choose ... any pics of girls (he thinks, not that he knows) under 18 shown are automatic pedos for those looking at such pics.
Even if a husband of 16 is looking at a pic of his wife who is also 16 (in USA, many states allow 16 year olds to marry).
You know, before I would call someone a pedo I would have actual evidence of such instead of coming to quick conclusions completely devoid of facts related to all the elements.
Its a lack of knowldge on the subject matter.
Feelings. That's what counts.
And now @theoldones creates a new "crime" - pedo accomplice. Sweet...of course anyone who does not complain is complicit. Hence also a pedo accomplice. That's everyone but @theoldones I guess ...
Guy sees the pic and then feels compelled to harass the OP ... its fine , its free speech, nothing major...but it raises ??? ...which I ask and am awaiting a response.
But really, any response is going to lead to a bad light being shown by the first commentor. Clearly it gives the appearance that he has some level if sexual excitement from the photo, otherwise he would not have posted at all -- or it just shows that his complaints are mostly merit-less. I think the latter ... but not 100% sure...just guessing.
I know its not popular to defend free speech. Your post examples this.
OP posts those pics for a reason. Why are you going after the one that you think “could be” excited over that image, instead of the one that clearly is?
view the rest of the comments →
thelma ago
I'm beginning to think that people posts pics just to cause some to go crazy.
https://files.catbox.moe/xif590.jpg
Is this pic all the evidence you need to declare a person a pedo, @theoldones ?
I just noted some of what I think are legal hurdles and suggested that @theoldones move to get a petition to change the rules of voat.
Now, we see the age of 18 to be the age that @theoldone arbitrarily choose ... any pics of girls (he thinks, not that he knows) under 18 shown are automatic pedos for those looking at such pics.
Even if a husband of 16 is looking at a pic of his wife who is also 16 (in USA, many states allow 16 year olds to marry).
You know, before I would call someone a pedo I would have actual evidence of such instead of coming to quick conclusions completely devoid of facts related to all the elements.
Its a lack of knowldge on the subject matter.
Feelings. That's what counts.
And now @theoldones creates a new "crime" - pedo accomplice. Sweet...of course anyone who does not complain is complicit. Hence also a pedo accomplice. That's everyone but @theoldones I guess ...
Kudos. You just outted yourself as a wack-job.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
You seem like a pedophile enabler @Thelma. You a dude?
thelma ago
Have you seen this post/thread?
https://voat.co/v/youngladies/3294393
Guy sees the pic and then feels compelled to harass the OP ... its fine , its free speech, nothing major...but it raises ??? ...which I ask and am awaiting a response.
But really, any response is going to lead to a bad light being shown by the first commentor. Clearly it gives the appearance that he has some level if sexual excitement from the photo, otherwise he would not have posted at all -- or it just shows that his complaints are mostly merit-less. I think the latter ... but not 100% sure...just guessing.
I know its not popular to defend free speech. Your post examples this.
InSaneGoatPosse ago
You felt compelled to harass @theoldones.
OP posts those pics for a reason. Why are you going after the one that you think “could be” excited over that image, instead of the one that clearly is?
thelma ago
https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=uIxBmyRQlwQ
Free speech ... love it or leave