So I just went back in my post history, looking for a sub from maybe 1.5 years ago- we had a very convincing identity of who might be the initial individual "Q". He was some chubby jewish political attache for Trump admin, kind of a low level position among them.
Really wish I could recall the name and find you the links- I think it'd blow your mind. The evidence and sources were astounding, even to me, Sir Ebral. A mind like yours would find the same appreciation for the evidence. You might even know what I'm talking about already.
The thing is, I'd imagine the Q operation didn't begin an operation- it began as a shitpost by this jew politician. Then a few more, then the CIA stepped in and said "We'll take it from here, shalom" and went to work with the real pacification phase of the new operation. Seizing on a viral internet incident is a rather brilliant move, especially considering the anonymity involved.
Oh for fuck's sake @OriginalRealityCheck, anyone around here with half a clue knows I don't know how to fucking run a bot & actually don't give a god damned fuck about learning anything about it.
Jew double-speak. He's doing what people with aspergers do - arguing over semantics, ignoring meaning and intent. If you had said "removed him from further dialogue" he wouldn't have been able to try to pretend he hasn't banned the user account as a method to deflect that the actual core of what you are both talking about is him deleting the submission itself.
Wheelchair boy does this all the time when he gets frustrated.
Jew double-speak. He's doing what people with aspergers do - arguing over semantics, ignoring meaning and intent.
You're confused about what those terms mean. Semantics is the meaning and intent of words. Jews do the exact opposite of arguing semantics: They refuse to define terms at all so that their words don't have a definitive meaning.
As an example:
Go ahead and ask a jew the next time he's arguing that "diversity is strength" to define "diversity" and "strength". They will never do it. If they did, the goyim would be able to plainly see that either:
A: "diversity" is not "strength" (i.e. the definitions do not match or even overlap).
B: jews are manipulatively defining terms (e.g. "I define diversity to be a kind of strength that comes from vibrancy" or some other bullshit).
C: jews are sub-nigger IQ (i.e. accepting reasonable definitions for the terms which obviously do not overlap but still maintaining that its true).
Arguing semantics (i.e. demanding definitions for words that need them) is demonized by jews for this very reason. You probably have forgotten, somewhere in the recesses of your subconscious, but the reason you dislike "arguing semantics" is because of (((hollywood))).
From what I understand, he's a man in a position very close to the President, with access to all kinds of information that would literally melt your fucking soul if you heard.
He drip feeds it onto the internet like morphine, making a vaguely worded prediction or statement that his dedicated followers immediately set to work tearing apart. They take a 5 word sentence of his, and look at it from every possible angle you could imagine, desperately trying to squeeze the real meaning out of it.
Early on, it was a rather convincing hoax. As time passes, it's become clear that this "Q" individual is a liar. It's likely not an individual, but many people working on a carefully tailored operation.
It appears to be directed at the group of Americans that would be most dangerous to a tyrannical government- "middle Americans". The early-middle aged, "middle class", heavily armed, fanatically patriotic, Christian, and hard-working types. The amount of time these folks pour into decoding Q's nonsense that could be devoted to... making more White babies or something like that, it's obscene.
The funniest thing of all is when they blatantly change the wording of things that were said, and then try to decode it. Like that "10 days of darkness" shit.
They were waking up to Jews rather quickly before your Lord and Saviour, Zyklon_b ran off their board owner by showing how much of a pedophile and satanist he could be regarding her children.
Why did the board owner tolerate such shit from Zyklon, and go along with it, instead of saying "You're disgusting. Fuck off." at the first instance? And why are you white knighting for her?
This just seems like pointless drama that could have been nipped in the bud by calling someone a fuckwit and moving on.
If one of them was being a fuckwit to her, why did she not just say "Fuck off" or ignore them entirely? How could they even know she had children in the first place, unless she posted real life information and it somehow got traced to here. If that's the case, that's not doxxing. Stupidity perhaps, but certainly not doxxing.
Calling my comment "stupid" is hardly a deflection of the issues I expressed though. I asked in good faith, I expected a good faith response.
If one of them was being a fuckwit to her, why did she not just say "Fuck off" or ignore them entirely?
1) Thousands of alts.
2) Pings.
3) Pings to other users of this sub causing them to bring up what's going on here.
4) Personally identifiable info being divulged through shady means.
Now apologize for asking the same question a second time, and state very clearly that you understand why she didn't just ignore them and tell them to fuck off.
The conversation goes no farther than your ability to admit your stupidity and that you're wrong.
How did they find out such information? What "shady means" do you speak of? If I remember correctly, the information was public knowledge, of which that doesn't constitute "doxxing", and is definitely not "shady means".
I think you stating "thousands of alts" is being a bit overblown. I remember seeing maybe 3 or 4 people being stupid at the time, but I don't remember seeing any more than that - unless all of this happened in DMs, in which case it's easily blockable.
Furthermore - why are you being so hostile to me? This conversation is two sided and you don't get to dictate terms on whether or not it continues just based on your say-so. I'm asking questions to understand what went on - you snapping and attempting to bite my head by saying "LOL U R WRONG" tells me plenty about the situation at least on your part.
This isn't a matter of whether I'm right or wrong - in fact, it is a matter of whether you are right or wrong. I'm asking questions. The hostility isn't necessary.
It was Beatle and I 🤣 and a few others, not thousands who took out Skrayzie the whore of Babylon.
Grench is a failure. This crybaby writes endless posts showing his mental illness, and he is a Necrophilic obessed with a dead infant who died of Anenchephaly. He was trying to show he was edgy, yet showed he was creepy.
My problem is how you're censoring the fuck out of any Free Speech in your walled garden. Nobody can question your precious cult.
Good job trying to distract and turn it into something else completely unrelated, but it doesn't work that way outside the area where you can delete everyone's responses. Fuck off.
Posted automatically (#104497) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Level37: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
You deleted the entire submission and silenced his whole dialogue. Now everyone else knows any constructive dialogue can be deleted, at your whims, because you believe you are weeding out bad actors.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again; you are your own worst enemy.
Horrux ago
Finally. Jesus that took long enough!!!
OriginalRealityCheck ago
Only trolls trying to waste real people's time....
OriginalRealityCheck ago
Typical troll tactic.
I don't jump through hoops for troll scum....
midnightblue1335 ago
So I just went back in my post history, looking for a sub from maybe 1.5 years ago- we had a very convincing identity of who might be the initial individual "Q". He was some chubby jewish political attache for Trump admin, kind of a low level position among them.
Really wish I could recall the name and find you the links- I think it'd blow your mind. The evidence and sources were astounding, even to me, Sir Ebral. A mind like yours would find the same appreciation for the evidence. You might even know what I'm talking about already.
The thing is, I'd imagine the Q operation didn't begin an operation- it began as a shitpost by this jew politician. Then a few more, then the CIA stepped in and said "We'll take it from here, shalom" and went to work with the real pacification phase of the new operation. Seizing on a viral internet incident is a rather brilliant move, especially considering the anonymity involved.
dassaer ago
Waahahahaa, i know the date on that is old but holy fck, i'm delirious, you got to be kidding me ....
midnightblue1335 ago
Woahhh, careful now- people are going to accuse you of being a u/Tallest_Skil alt.
OriginalRealityCheck ago
Obviously a shill troll bot OP providing a space for other shill troll bots to talk to each other....
notvirge ago
It's so funny it literally hurts watching a 1.5 year old account that's only ever posted in GA declare @Rotteuxx as a "shill troll bot".
Rotteuxx ago
Oh for fuck's sake @OriginalRealityCheck, anyone around here with half a clue knows I don't know how to fucking run a bot & actually don't give a god damned fuck about learning anything about it.
OriginalRealityCheck ago
Well then, you can only be just another Commie Scum Troll Shill....
Rotteuxx ago
Whatever keeps your cognitive dissonance in check...
notvirge ago
P.S.. sometimes goats.. weld. ;)
notvirge ago
Jew double-speak. He's doing what people with aspergers do - arguing over semantics, ignoring meaning and intent. If you had said "removed him from further dialogue" he wouldn't have been able to try to pretend he hasn't banned the user account as a method to deflect that the actual core of what you are both talking about is him deleting the submission itself.
Wheelchair boy does this all the time when he gets frustrated.
noob_tube ago
You're confused about what those terms mean. Semantics is the meaning and intent of words. Jews do the exact opposite of arguing semantics: They refuse to define terms at all so that their words don't have a definitive meaning.
As an example:
Go ahead and ask a jew the next time he's arguing that "diversity is strength" to define "diversity" and "strength". They will never do it. If they did, the goyim would be able to plainly see that either:
A: "diversity" is not "strength" (i.e. the definitions do not match or even overlap).
B: jews are manipulatively defining terms (e.g. "I define diversity to be a kind of strength that comes from vibrancy" or some other bullshit).
C: jews are sub-nigger IQ (i.e. accepting reasonable definitions for the terms which obviously do not overlap but still maintaining that its true).
Arguing semantics (i.e. demanding definitions for words that need them) is demonized by jews for this very reason. You probably have forgotten, somewhere in the recesses of your subconscious, but the reason you dislike "arguing semantics" is because of (((hollywood))).
Intrixina ago
I think the best way to describe it is that (((certain types))) will eternally change the goalposts so that they always win and you always lose.
Crensch ago
What part of that is proof that I removed him?
Rotteuxx ago
https://voat.co/v/disabled/3761552/
obvious-throwaway- ago
Crensh? Oh, you mean KrippleKike
CalibanFresco ago
I've never really followed what Q is supposed to be, and I think I'm okay with that.
midnightblue1335 ago
From what I understand, he's a man in a position very close to the President, with access to all kinds of information that would literally melt your fucking soul if you heard.
He drip feeds it onto the internet like morphine, making a vaguely worded prediction or statement that his dedicated followers immediately set to work tearing apart. They take a 5 word sentence of his, and look at it from every possible angle you could imagine, desperately trying to squeeze the real meaning out of it.
Early on, it was a rather convincing hoax. As time passes, it's become clear that this "Q" individual is a liar. It's likely not an individual, but many people working on a carefully tailored operation.
It appears to be directed at the group of Americans that would be most dangerous to a tyrannical government- "middle Americans". The early-middle aged, "middle class", heavily armed, fanatically patriotic, Christian, and hard-working types. The amount of time these folks pour into decoding Q's nonsense that could be devoted to... making more White babies or something like that, it's obscene.
Intrixina ago
The funniest thing of all is when they blatantly change the wording of things that were said, and then try to decode it. Like that "10 days of darkness" shit.
fuspezza ago
Ask @crensch about @@jem777
Rotteuxx ago
@Crensch, what's that aboot @jem777 ?
Crensch ago
Terrible researcher. Mentally ill.
Nietzsche___ ago
That was anti climactic...
Rotteuxx ago
Unless @fuspezza has anything to add.
fuspezza ago
Dont mind if I do
https://searchvoat.co/?t=Jem777
Rotteuxx ago
Ah, interesting post
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3310500/
Rotteuxx ago
Hey little missy!
You just missed the beginning of the end for Qtards :)
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3760954/
Besides that just laughing at Croonsch in v/disabled
Happy ham eating day!
Reinhart ago
Lol prepare for a meaningless wall of text
Crensch ago
344 upvotes, and the SBBH trolls started their attacks against that user almost immediately after.
Meaning if you want the ones trying to keep Q followers from knowing about the Jews, you're attacking the wrong people.
SBBH folks way overplay their "anti-semitism" in an attempt to push away the normies. Chew on that for a while.
Crensch ago
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3140875
Eat a dick.
albatrosv15 ago
Any day now!
Crensch ago
They were waking up to Jews rather quickly before your Lord and Saviour, Zyklon_b ran off their board owner by showing how much of a pedophile and satanist he could be regarding her children.
Intrixina ago
I have a couple of genuine questions, though:
Why did the board owner tolerate such shit from Zyklon, and go along with it, instead of saying "You're disgusting. Fuck off." at the first instance? And why are you white knighting for her?
This just seems like pointless drama that could have been nipped in the bud by calling someone a fuckwit and moving on.
Crensch ago
ProtectVoat and "the Voat Immune System" which is just SBBH.
The threat to her sub from them.
And they kept stalking, harassing, doxxing, and threatening her children with sodomy and worse while outside GA.
What would that have accomplished?
The rest of your comment is equally stupid.
Intrixina ago
You didn't answer my questions.
If one of them was being a fuckwit to her, why did she not just say "Fuck off" or ignore them entirely? How could they even know she had children in the first place, unless she posted real life information and it somehow got traced to here. If that's the case, that's not doxxing. Stupidity perhaps, but certainly not doxxing.
Calling my comment "stupid" is hardly a deflection of the issues I expressed though. I asked in good faith, I expected a good faith response.
Crensch ago
You had none worthy of acknowledging.
1) Thousands of alts.
2) Pings.
3) Pings to other users of this sub causing them to bring up what's going on here.
4) Personally identifiable info being divulged through shady means.
Now apologize for asking the same question a second time, and state very clearly that you understand why she didn't just ignore them and tell them to fuck off.
The conversation goes no farther than your ability to admit your stupidity and that you're wrong.
Intrixina ago
How did they find out such information? What "shady means" do you speak of? If I remember correctly, the information was public knowledge, of which that doesn't constitute "doxxing", and is definitely not "shady means".
I think you stating "thousands of alts" is being a bit overblown. I remember seeing maybe 3 or 4 people being stupid at the time, but I don't remember seeing any more than that - unless all of this happened in DMs, in which case it's easily blockable.
Furthermore - why are you being so hostile to me? This conversation is two sided and you don't get to dictate terms on whether or not it continues just based on your say-so. I'm asking questions to understand what went on - you snapping and attempting to bite my head by saying "LOL U R WRONG" tells me plenty about the situation at least on your part.
This isn't a matter of whether I'm right or wrong - in fact, it is a matter of whether you are right or wrong. I'm asking questions. The hostility isn't necessary.
Gothamgirl ago
It was Beatle and I 🤣 and a few others, not thousands who took out Skrayzie the whore of Babylon.
Grench is a failure. This crybaby writes endless posts showing his mental illness, and he is a Necrophilic obessed with a dead infant who died of Anenchephaly. He was trying to show he was edgy, yet showed he was creepy.
#1990 SANCHITO
Rotteuxx ago
Is it possible that the higher cast kikes behind the WuFlu obliterated a lower tier OP run by inbred jidf?
Horrux ago
That wouldn't be out of character at all.
Crensch ago
Reminder that the guy above supports and defends a pedophile, and belongs to a group that does the same.
obvious_throwaway1 ago
Sometimes I wish you weren't such a huge piece of shit.
Crensch ago
"Crensch called out a pedophile-supporter again, what a huge piece of shit!"
obvious_throwaway1 ago
My problem is how you're censoring the fuck out of any Free Speech in your walled garden. Nobody can question your precious cult.
Good job trying to distract and turn it into something else completely unrelated, but it doesn't work that way outside the area where you can delete everyone's responses. Fuck off.
Crensch ago
"Crensch called out a pedophile-supporter again, what a huge piece of shit!"Â
antiracistMetal ago
Well you are a huge piece of shit.
DEA-AgentPisco ago
That's an unusual way to distract away from your censorship. Bravo, sir.
Crensch ago
1m old account. 28ccp.
Notice OP asked me where my supporting links were. He knows they exist, he knows they're legit, and he knows idiots like you won't care.
obvious_throwaway1 ago
What does his account age have to do with the fact that you're literally censoring left and right?
Crensch ago
What does censoring have to do with removing very obvious shill accounts?
albatrosv15 ago
You gotta be fucking kidding me.
Level37 ago
..you're claiming @Johnny_Ninja is a shill account? Holy shit your power trip is visible for everyone.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakening comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#104497) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Level37: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Crensch ago
Not remotely.
I'm of the mind he is not. I didn't remove him at all.
Level37 ago
Looks like you banned guys him to me, you liar. Just because you used an alt to do it doesn't mean you didn't do it. Pathetic.
notvirge ago
You deleted his entire submission!
Crensch ago
What part of that is me removing him?
notvirge ago
You deleted the entire submission and silenced his whole dialogue. Now everyone else knows any constructive dialogue can be deleted, at your whims, because you believe you are weeding out bad actors.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again; you are your own worst enemy.
WhiteRonin was right..
Rotteuxx ago
Crenschy!!!!!
You forgot to drop all those links to your supporting evidence, you're dropping the ball fren.