Jew double-speak. He's doing what people with aspergers do - arguing over semantics, ignoring meaning and intent. If you had said "removed him from further dialogue" he wouldn't have been able to try to pretend he hasn't banned the user account as a method to deflect that the actual core of what you are both talking about is him deleting the submission itself.
Wheelchair boy does this all the time when he gets frustrated.
Jew double-speak. He's doing what people with aspergers do - arguing over semantics, ignoring meaning and intent.
You're confused about what those terms mean. Semantics is the meaning and intent of words. Jews do the exact opposite of arguing semantics: They refuse to define terms at all so that their words don't have a definitive meaning.
As an example:
Go ahead and ask a jew the next time he's arguing that "diversity is strength" to define "diversity" and "strength". They will never do it. If they did, the goyim would be able to plainly see that either:
A: "diversity" is not "strength" (i.e. the definitions do not match or even overlap).
B: jews are manipulatively defining terms (e.g. "I define diversity to be a kind of strength that comes from vibrancy" or some other bullshit).
C: jews are sub-nigger IQ (i.e. accepting reasonable definitions for the terms which obviously do not overlap but still maintaining that its true).
Arguing semantics (i.e. demanding definitions for words that need them) is demonized by jews for this very reason. You probably have forgotten, somewhere in the recesses of your subconscious, but the reason you dislike "arguing semantics" is because of (((hollywood))).
view the rest of the comments →
notvirge ago
Jew double-speak. He's doing what people with aspergers do - arguing over semantics, ignoring meaning and intent. If you had said "removed him from further dialogue" he wouldn't have been able to try to pretend he hasn't banned the user account as a method to deflect that the actual core of what you are both talking about is him deleting the submission itself.
Wheelchair boy does this all the time when he gets frustrated.
noob_tube ago
You're confused about what those terms mean. Semantics is the meaning and intent of words. Jews do the exact opposite of arguing semantics: They refuse to define terms at all so that their words don't have a definitive meaning.
As an example:
Go ahead and ask a jew the next time he's arguing that "diversity is strength" to define "diversity" and "strength". They will never do it. If they did, the goyim would be able to plainly see that either:
A: "diversity" is not "strength" (i.e. the definitions do not match or even overlap).
B: jews are manipulatively defining terms (e.g. "I define diversity to be a kind of strength that comes from vibrancy" or some other bullshit).
C: jews are sub-nigger IQ (i.e. accepting reasonable definitions for the terms which obviously do not overlap but still maintaining that its true).
Arguing semantics (i.e. demanding definitions for words that need them) is demonized by jews for this very reason. You probably have forgotten, somewhere in the recesses of your subconscious, but the reason you dislike "arguing semantics" is because of (((hollywood))).
Intrixina ago
I think the best way to describe it is that (((certain types))) will eternally change the goalposts so that they always win and you always lose.