SBBH = /v/soapboxbanhammer
Let's start off with the user that tipped us off to this coven of degenerates that love talking about raping children, and threaten and dox innocent parents in order to get their rocks off.
zyklon_b
@zyklon_b LOVES to talk about sodomizing ferret's (@AR47's) son, sodomizing him to DEATH, admits to fantasizing about him riding a bike without a seat (sodomizing the child), and fantasizes about a father fucking his own son to death.
@AR47's son is 10 years old.
One would think that in a mentally-healthy forum, you'd have people hating zyklon, right? He should have no friends, and nobody should be defending him, right?
Wrong.
Almost literally every username associated with /v/soapboxbanhammer has defended this sack of shit, calling the above "trolling" or "joking". Stating that it's "satire", while not even understanding the definition of the word.
Let's be honest. It's sick. It's degenerate. It's disgusting. People that say those things are not moral people, and people that defend him, or defend the saying of those things as a "joke" are not moral.
Rotteuxx
Next we have @Rotteuxx, who, in that same thread, attempts to argue that IF one of zyklon's targets isn't actually a child, that makes him NOT a pedophile. Failing to realize that pedophile stings would not work without it, and that the actual age of the target has nothing to do with the belief of the pedophile that he is fantasizing about a child.
He also tried to argue that it's just a troll, and that somehow that makes it OK. Even going so far as to claim that someone calling out that kind of disgusting behaviour is "throwing tantrums like a little bitch".
Also, plastering images of a zyklon-targeted-child's mother all over a subverse is supposedly "not an attack", but is a "troll", despite it seeming a lot like teaming up with the pedophile attacking her child at the time. Remember, those images *were not directly shared with Voat, but justified in their use as doing a "simple search" to find them.
Gothamgirl
Supposedly zyklon's "wife", spread the rumor all over /v/PizzaGate that @srayzie planted child porn on her phone. And that sounds absurd, because of course it's absurd. @srayzie didn't know gothamgirl, and didn't have access to the device.
What we know from this:
1) Gothamgirl had child porn on her phone.
2) She accused some random person on the internet of putting it there.
Who really put it there? We never found out, but some of us pointed her in the direction of her "husband", but she adamantly refused to lay the blame on him.
Who was left with access to that phone?
Yep. Gothamgirl. Who probably got spooked and wanted plausible deniability for her own sick images? videos? being on there. Sounds crazy? Keep reading.
@zyklon_b spent well over a month threatening to rape, murder, and EAT @srayzie and @shizy's children, and this is 100% during the time Gothamgirl claimed to be his wife/girlfriend. She even was a mod on /v/BEATLESTROLLARMY where zyklon's buddies congregated, and where a picture of a dead child was stickied to the top with a cannibalistic headline for over 24 hours. She admitted to knowing about it being there and "begging him to remove it" when she could have done exactly that, herself, being an [O] at the time.
Instead, it was left up.
Fact: She knew Zyklon posted about raping children constantly and stayed with him.
Fact: She said multiple times that @srayzie deserved it, despite @srayzie never doing anything to her.
You tell me if it still sounds crazy.
Trigglypuff
Along with defending another, seemingly unrelated pedophile @hojuruku, and trying to attack Zyklon's victim by claiming she doxxed said pedophile, @Trigglypuff LOVED to defend zyklon and attack his innocent victim!
"He's not a pedophile for threatening to rape your kid! He's a LARP! It's a JOKE! HAHA!"
Quoting Bane while pinging her buddy, zyklon during the month-long threatening to rape srayzie's children
Suggesting that perhaps @srayzie was attacked because of her role in being a Q sub owner and being outgoing and friendly to everyone there... and buddying up to zyklon some more.
Also responsible for the subverse dedicated to plastering pictures that were not shared here all over a subverse dedicated to doxxing @srayzie. Again, an innocent victim of a pedophile that, for some reason, this sick individual decided to also target at the same time.
Expertshitposter
Admits @zyklon was still his buddy after making pedophilic, cannibalistic, and homicidal threats against children for over a month, multiple times a day.
you don't just turn your back on your buddies
I don't have buddies that think about sex acts against children multiple times a day for over a month, do you? Hell, I don't have buddies that even say shit like that. If I did, they wouldn't be my buddy anymore.
And you know what else? I wouldn't be friends with someone that was friends with a pedophile like that. Would you?
heygeorge
The guy that is happy to have the above names in his modlist, and more I've yet to post about. He really doesn't like the fact that I called him out for trying to paint the narrative that I was the one "stirring the pot" when he and his pedo crew have constantly posted about the srayzie incident for the past 7 months.
Whatever the case, his /v/SoapboxBanhammer sub is a wretched hive of scum and villainy, housing literal pedophiles and their buddies, and this should make you cautious of anyone posting there.
And now @Crensch waits for SBBH alts and friends to defend their pedo buddies above using absolutely zero links to support their claims and narratives.
Edit:
Aww, I didn't call it first, but here they are celebrating being listed as sick fucks. I bet they think this gets better for them if they pretend they don't care.
view the rest of the comments β
TimMasson1 ago
Why would you involve yourself in all this drama? Why not just ignore these people? I don't understand it my friend.
Crensch ago
20 day old username making milquetoast posts constantly, and to the delight of no one, in order to astroturf a "neutral third party" vibe when finally attacking me.
Note the username that happens to look suspiciously like a first and last name, suggesting the naive boomer doxxed himself, but despite my pointing that out early on, he continues to use this username.
Here's anti-Crensch user @m_1 pinging this username for seemingly no reason whatsoever 14 days after its creation.
185 posts in 20 days; nothing but Voat's analog of a Reddit re-post bot. Honestly, an Overton-Window-moving load of reddit-tier "DAE" type posts, too.
1,227 comments in 20 days asking 3 days into the account's existence:
And he proceeds to act for all the world like a naive boomer, but gives himself away with a comment in /v/SoapboxBanhammer saying:
For those that don't know, this is a common comment from @zyklon_b, who would accuse users of "raping and murdering a child in 1990". Following which he would simply write "1990", and it became a dogwhistle between SBBH users that liked zyklon.
You can see from his comment history that he had no organic introduction to this concept.
He continues to interact a lot with @m_1 in nests like this, talking about how someone is downvoting all of m_1's comments because they're socializing with him, (An 11 day old account.)
And finally, 3 days after his account creation, he writes this:
3 day old account. That is now trying to demoralize me by "asking questions" about "ignoring" *literal pedophiles.
SBBH is cancer.
TimMasson1 ago
I don't see any kind of problem with anything I've said or done here. You come across as absolutely insane inserting yourself into all of this drama. I don't mean to be negative but what you do is very odd behavior and not normal. I cannot believe you went digging through all of my posting history, that is just stalker insane weirdness. Do you realize how strange that is for you to do something like that? Keep digging because you're not going to find anything bad on me. Everything you posted is just me trying to help people. I don't like you you are weird.
Crensch ago
HAHAHAHAHA
Muh "normal username" totally not one of (((SBBH))) calling me out.
Knew that was coming. Called it outright.
TimMasson1 ago
I don't understand what you think you've caught me on? Honestly what you did is very very abnormal behavior. You have some kind of mental health issue and I'm being completely serious.
Crensch ago
20 days of buildup to fail the moment you reared your low-IQ kike snout out of the sewage you were swilling around in.
TimMasson1 ago
π€£π€£π€£π€£πππππ€£π€£π€£π€£ππππ you clearly lost this little battle friend, just look at the numbers. I'll tell you what, I'll stay away from you and you stay away from me and we'll both just go on with our lives separately. I came into your post and made a comment thinking maybe it would help you and you went on some long psychotic research project involving me. You're not normal. Typically I'd be fine with that but you're also very negative oh, that's what I have a problem with. I proved my point and now I'm done with you. I do wish you well thoughπ€£π€£π€£π€£ππππ
Crensch ago
TimMasson1 ago
π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£ππππππππ€£π€£π€£ I knew that would trigger you until you finally got back to me. You're too easy man. You have the most fragile ego on voat and the fact that you spend hours doing deep dive Research into people's posting histories proves you are mentally unstable. I've seen you do this many times. You have way too much emotionally invested into this silly online form which means nothing in real life. You are purposely creating drama for yourself because you have nothing else going on in your life. And after all of this research you've done you haven't even figured out who I am yet and if you have its because someone told you. Also if you had figured it out you would have realize I have absolutely nothing to do with you or your gay ass drama. As a matter of fact I've tried to help you in the past. You need a hobby. I've already asked that you stay away from me you weirdo, honestly you have severe mental health issues. ππ€―
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectGoats submission by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#85963) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TimMasson1: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Crensch ago
Does it hurt your ego that it took me less than 10 minutes to figure you out?