SBBH = /v/soapboxbanhammer
Let's start off with the user that tipped us off to this coven of degenerates that love talking about raping children, and threaten and dox innocent parents in order to get their rocks off.
zyklon_b
@zyklon_b LOVES to talk about sodomizing ferret's (@AR47's) son, sodomizing him to DEATH, admits to fantasizing about him riding a bike without a seat (sodomizing the child), and fantasizes about a father fucking his own son to death.
@AR47's son is 10 years old.
One would think that in a mentally-healthy forum, you'd have people hating zyklon, right? He should have no friends, and nobody should be defending him, right?
Wrong.
Almost literally every username associated with /v/soapboxbanhammer has defended this sack of shit, calling the above "trolling" or "joking". Stating that it's "satire", while not even understanding the definition of the word.
Let's be honest. It's sick. It's degenerate. It's disgusting. People that say those things are not moral people, and people that defend him, or defend the saying of those things as a "joke" are not moral.
Rotteuxx
Next we have @Rotteuxx, who, in that same thread, attempts to argue that IF one of zyklon's targets isn't actually a child, that makes him NOT a pedophile. Failing to realize that pedophile stings would not work without it, and that the actual age of the target has nothing to do with the belief of the pedophile that he is fantasizing about a child.
He also tried to argue that it's just a troll, and that somehow that makes it OK. Even going so far as to claim that someone calling out that kind of disgusting behaviour is "throwing tantrums like a little bitch".
Also, plastering images of a zyklon-targeted-child's mother all over a subverse is supposedly "not an attack", but is a "troll", despite it seeming a lot like teaming up with the pedophile attacking her child at the time. Remember, those images *were not directly shared with Voat, but justified in their use as doing a "simple search" to find them.
Gothamgirl
Supposedly zyklon's "wife", spread the rumor all over /v/PizzaGate that @srayzie planted child porn on her phone. And that sounds absurd, because of course it's absurd. @srayzie didn't know gothamgirl, and didn't have access to the device.
What we know from this:
1) Gothamgirl had child porn on her phone.
2) She accused some random person on the internet of putting it there.
Who really put it there? We never found out, but some of us pointed her in the direction of her "husband", but she adamantly refused to lay the blame on him.
Who was left with access to that phone?
Yep. Gothamgirl. Who probably got spooked and wanted plausible deniability for her own sick images? videos? being on there. Sounds crazy? Keep reading.
@zyklon_b spent well over a month threatening to rape, murder, and EAT @srayzie and @shizy's children, and this is 100% during the time Gothamgirl claimed to be his wife/girlfriend. She even was a mod on /v/BEATLESTROLLARMY where zyklon's buddies congregated, and where a picture of a dead child was stickied to the top with a cannibalistic headline for over 24 hours. She admitted to knowing about it being there and "begging him to remove it" when she could have done exactly that, herself, being an [O] at the time.
Instead, it was left up.
Fact: She knew Zyklon posted about raping children constantly and stayed with him.
Fact: She said multiple times that @srayzie deserved it, despite @srayzie never doing anything to her.
You tell me if it still sounds crazy.
Trigglypuff
Along with defending another, seemingly unrelated pedophile @hojuruku, and trying to attack Zyklon's victim by claiming she doxxed said pedophile, @Trigglypuff LOVED to defend zyklon and attack his innocent victim!
"He's not a pedophile for threatening to rape your kid! He's a LARP! It's a JOKE! HAHA!"
Quoting Bane while pinging her buddy, zyklon during the month-long threatening to rape srayzie's children
Suggesting that perhaps @srayzie was attacked because of her role in being a Q sub owner and being outgoing and friendly to everyone there... and buddying up to zyklon some more.
Also responsible for the subverse dedicated to plastering pictures that were not shared here all over a subverse dedicated to doxxing @srayzie. Again, an innocent victim of a pedophile that, for some reason, this sick individual decided to also target at the same time.
Expertshitposter
Admits @zyklon was still his buddy after making pedophilic, cannibalistic, and homicidal threats against children for over a month, multiple times a day.
you don't just turn your back on your buddies
I don't have buddies that think about sex acts against children multiple times a day for over a month, do you? Hell, I don't have buddies that even say shit like that. If I did, they wouldn't be my buddy anymore.
And you know what else? I wouldn't be friends with someone that was friends with a pedophile like that. Would you?
heygeorge
The guy that is happy to have the above names in his modlist, and more I've yet to post about. He really doesn't like the fact that I called him out for trying to paint the narrative that I was the one "stirring the pot" when he and his pedo crew have constantly posted about the srayzie incident for the past 7 months.
Whatever the case, his /v/SoapboxBanhammer sub is a wretched hive of scum and villainy, housing literal pedophiles and their buddies, and this should make you cautious of anyone posting there.
And now @Crensch waits for SBBH alts and friends to defend their pedo buddies above using absolutely zero links to support their claims and narratives.
Edit:
Aww, I didn't call it first, but here they are celebrating being listed as sick fucks. I bet they think this gets better for them if they pretend they don't care.
view the rest of the comments β
TimMasson1 ago
Why would you involve yourself in all this drama? Why not just ignore these people? I don't understand it my friend.
Crensch ago
20 day old username making milquetoast posts constantly, and to the delight of no one, in order to astroturf a "neutral third party" vibe when finally attacking me.
Note the username that happens to look suspiciously like a first and last name, suggesting the naive boomer doxxed himself, but despite my pointing that out early on, he continues to use this username.
Here's anti-Crensch user @m_1 pinging this username for seemingly no reason whatsoever 14 days after its creation.
185 posts in 20 days; nothing but Voat's analog of a Reddit re-post bot. Honestly, an Overton-Window-moving load of reddit-tier "DAE" type posts, too.
1,227 comments in 20 days asking 3 days into the account's existence:
And he proceeds to act for all the world like a naive boomer, but gives himself away with a comment in /v/SoapboxBanhammer saying:
For those that don't know, this is a common comment from @zyklon_b, who would accuse users of "raping and murdering a child in 1990". Following which he would simply write "1990", and it became a dogwhistle between SBBH users that liked zyklon.
You can see from his comment history that he had no organic introduction to this concept.
He continues to interact a lot with @m_1 in nests like this, talking about how someone is downvoting all of m_1's comments because they're socializing with him, (An 11 day old account.)
And finally, 3 days after his account creation, he writes this:
3 day old account. That is now trying to demoralize me by "asking questions" about "ignoring" *literal pedophiles.
SBBH is cancer.
TimMasson1 ago
I don't see any kind of problem with anything I've said or done here. You come across as absolutely insane inserting yourself into all of this drama. I don't mean to be negative but what you do is very odd behavior and not normal. I cannot believe you went digging through all of my posting history, that is just stalker insane weirdness. Do you realize how strange that is for you to do something like that? Keep digging because you're not going to find anything bad on me. Everything you posted is just me trying to help people. I don't like you you are weird.
Crensch ago
HAHAHAHAHA
Muh "normal username" totally not one of (((SBBH))) calling me out.
Knew that was coming. Called it outright.
TimMasson1 ago
I don't understand what you think you've caught me on? Honestly what you did is very very abnormal behavior. You have some kind of mental health issue and I'm being completely serious.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectGoats submission by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#85964) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TimMasson1: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Crensch ago
20 days of buildup to fail the moment you reared your low-IQ kike snout out of the sewage you were swilling around in.
TimMasson1 ago
π€£π€£π€£π€£πππππ€£π€£π€£π€£ππππ you clearly lost this little battle friend, just look at the numbers. I'll tell you what, I'll stay away from you and you stay away from me and we'll both just go on with our lives separately. I came into your post and made a comment thinking maybe it would help you and you went on some long psychotic research project involving me. You're not normal. Typically I'd be fine with that but you're also very negative oh, that's what I have a problem with. I proved my point and now I'm done with you. I do wish you well thoughπ€£π€£π€£π€£ππππ
Crensch ago
TimMasson1 ago
I apologize for being so harsh in my response to you. I just got annoyed about that post you made as I found it to be very odd. Especially since all I did was make one tiny comment in your post trying to be helpful. I'm trying to be a positive force on voat but I'm only human.
Crensch ago
I don't believe the timing of your username creation is a coincidence. I saw your astroturfing, and your familiarity with other users, and how you tried to weasel your way into my affairs.
I saw your insincere attempts to "be nice" on Voat. To earn yourself a reputation as "that nice guy" like /v/pizzagate's @carmencita, whose only real role there is to legitimize the shills with her "oh my what a great post!" when it's utter horseshit.
You may be attempting to do something good for Voat, but I don't believe it; addressing me directly here when I have evidence that those I'm attacking stood up for, and teamed up with, a literal pedophile to attack an innocent woman and doxx her off the site suggests you have an ulterior motive.
Nothing I or that woman have done is deserving of the attacks we've received here. If you want to try to make Voat better, talking at me isn't the way to go about it.
TimMasson1 ago
I don't know the full situation of what went on with that woman but I don't need to because it's never okay to doxx someone and generally speaking I think it's in bad taste to be disrespectful to women. I have also gone to war with the sick fuck pedophiles here. I have told putt many times that any content whether it be a cartoon or anything else that involves the sexualization of a child should be a permanent bannable offense. Such things will very possibly be voats undoing and most importantly it's just wrong. I have been on voat a long time and I have never been involved in any of these dramas outside of what I just mentioned here. I'm just a shit poster who has decided to change and try to be a force positivity. The posts were you have seen me trying to give advice and help are just that, nothing more. I have no secret agenda and I am not on anybody's side. I think internet drama is ridiculous and honestly I think you desperately need to take a step back from all of it. I'm not your enemy.
Crensch ago
Almost seems human.
Can't argue with that.
Also a good point.
Forgive me if I don't believe a supposedly former shitposter. Not like you guys are consistent, or honest, and the lot of you seem to delight in that.
I wish I could believe that.
And this is why I don't believe you; just like all the pedofriends, you just want me to shut up. ANYthing to get me to shut up and stop highlighting the fact that (((SBBH))) is nothing but people that are friends with, buddy up with, and probably are, themselves, literal pedophiles.
I don't believe you, since your goal is the same as theirs.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/SoapboxBanhammer submission by @Crinsch.
Posted automatically (#82699) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Crensch: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crinsch)
TimMasson1 ago
Let me formally officially say I support you in fighting anyone that's a verified pedophile although I'm not going to get wrapped up in any of this drama. Do your thing but if you call me a pedo supporter again you will have a problem. I have seen firsthand the damage that sexual abuse has on children and the after effects it has on their adult life. It is literally worse than murder because almost all of these people grow up to have severe mental health issues and live a tortured life. Fuck you for saying that. I like you even less now.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectGoats submission by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#85962) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TimMasson1: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Crensch ago
Great!
Then why did you respond to me as if you knew what was going on if you had no idea what's going on? You responded to me twice suggesting that I shut up and let it go.
I don't know you, and I honestly don't give a fuck about you. Your behaviour was beyond suspicious, and if you put yourself in my shoes, you'd see that.
I fully agree. This shit isn't funny, but I have yet to find an (((SBBH))) poster that thinks the same.
I don't give a fuck. If you don't want to look like you're part of a pedophile group, don't make comments trying to get me to shut up when I'm calling them out.
Your behaviour is what got you that response. If you don't like it, stop acting like I'm the one that needs to stop.
BushChuck ago
"I have seen firsthand the damage that sexual abuse has on children and the after effects it has on their adult life."
Is this because you fuck children?
You did say, "firsthand".
TimMasson1 ago
No it's actually because my ex fiance was abused by her father and it went on to destroy her life in her 30s. Anyone who jokes around about this stuff or accuses others of it for no reason is a bad person. You are a bad person.
Crensch ago
Remember when you asked me this:
?
Zyklon_b threatened rape and murder on the children of at least three users here, and SBBH laughed it off. They supported him. They attacked and doxxed his victims. They upvoted a post about rape on Chrismas day.
You're a bad person, and you should feel bad.
TimMasson1 ago
So what do you hope to accomplish by keeping all of this drama going? Do you think you're going to get an apology from these people? Do you think you're going to teach them a lesson ? Do you think what you're doing makes any difference whatsoever ? You enjoy this and guess what I'm not the typical idiot you're used to dealing with on here. I know exactly what you are and what you are doing. I suggest you stop pestering me. Again, I know what you're doing.
Crensch ago
That's for me to know.
I don't even consider them human at this point, so of course not.
They certainly won't learn anything. Why would you think this?
Do you?
I know you're a coward that is trying to get me to stop doing what I'm doing instead of getting the pedophiles to stop doing what they're doing, despite your bullshit story of personal experience.
You don't actually care about any of that, because if you did, what I've been writing would matter to you. It doesn't, clearly.
So, enjoy being lumped in with them. Your threats are laughable.
TimMasson1 ago
You are that of which you accuse.
Crensch ago
Low-effort response to completely deconstructing your objections to my words.
Not surprising for an (((SBBH))) buddy.
TimMasson1 ago
π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£ππππππππ€£π€£π€£ I knew that would trigger you until you finally got back to me. You're too easy man. You have the most fragile ego on voat and the fact that you spend hours doing deep dive Research into people's posting histories proves you are mentally unstable. I've seen you do this many times. You have way too much emotionally invested into this silly online form which means nothing in real life. You are purposely creating drama for yourself because you have nothing else going on in your life. And after all of this research you've done you haven't even figured out who I am yet and if you have its because someone told you. Also if you had figured it out you would have realize I have absolutely nothing to do with you or your gay ass drama. As a matter of fact I've tried to help you in the past. You need a hobby. I've already asked that you stay away from me you weirdo, honestly you have severe mental health issues. ππ€―
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectGoats submission by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#85963) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TimMasson1: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Crensch ago
Does it hurt your ego that it took me less than 10 minutes to figure you out?