SBBH = /v/soapboxbanhammer

Let's start off with the user that tipped us off to this coven of degenerates that love talking about raping children, and threaten and dox innocent parents in order to get their rocks off.

zyklon_b

@zyklon_b LOVES to talk about sodomizing ferret's (@AR47's) son, sodomizing him to DEATH, admits to fantasizing about him riding a bike without a seat (sodomizing the child), and fantasizes about a father fucking his own son to death.

@AR47's son is 10 years old.

One would think that in a mentally-healthy forum, you'd have people hating zyklon, right? He should have no friends, and nobody should be defending him, right?

Wrong.

Almost literally every username associated with /v/soapboxbanhammer has defended this sack of shit, calling the above "trolling" or "joking". Stating that it's "satire", while not even understanding the definition of the word.

Let's be honest. It's sick. It's degenerate. It's disgusting. People that say those things are not moral people, and people that defend him, or defend the saying of those things as a "joke" are not moral.

Rotteuxx

Next we have @Rotteuxx, who, in that same thread, attempts to argue that IF one of zyklon's targets isn't actually a child, that makes him NOT a pedophile. Failing to realize that pedophile stings would not work without it, and that the actual age of the target has nothing to do with the belief of the pedophile that he is fantasizing about a child.

He also tried to argue that it's just a troll, and that somehow that makes it OK. Even going so far as to claim that someone calling out that kind of disgusting behaviour is "throwing tantrums like a little bitch".

Also, plastering images of a zyklon-targeted-child's mother all over a subverse is supposedly "not an attack", but is a "troll", despite it seeming a lot like teaming up with the pedophile attacking her child at the time. Remember, those images *were not directly shared with Voat, but justified in their use as doing a "simple search" to find them.

Gothamgirl

Supposedly zyklon's "wife", spread the rumor all over /v/PizzaGate that @srayzie planted child porn on her phone. And that sounds absurd, because of course it's absurd. @srayzie didn't know gothamgirl, and didn't have access to the device.

What we know from this:

1) Gothamgirl had child porn on her phone.

2) She accused some random person on the internet of putting it there.

Who really put it there? We never found out, but some of us pointed her in the direction of her "husband", but she adamantly refused to lay the blame on him.

Who was left with access to that phone?

Yep. Gothamgirl. Who probably got spooked and wanted plausible deniability for her own sick images? videos? being on there. Sounds crazy? Keep reading.

@zyklon_b spent well over a month threatening to rape, murder, and EAT @srayzie and @shizy's children, and this is 100% during the time Gothamgirl claimed to be his wife/girlfriend. She even was a mod on /v/BEATLESTROLLARMY where zyklon's buddies congregated, and where a picture of a dead child was stickied to the top with a cannibalistic headline for over 24 hours. She admitted to knowing about it being there and "begging him to remove it" when she could have done exactly that, herself, being an [O] at the time.

Instead, it was left up.

Fact: She knew Zyklon posted about raping children constantly and stayed with him.

Fact: She said multiple times that @srayzie deserved it, despite @srayzie never doing anything to her.

You tell me if it still sounds crazy.

Trigglypuff

Along with defending another, seemingly unrelated pedophile @hojuruku, and trying to attack Zyklon's victim by claiming she doxxed said pedophile, @Trigglypuff LOVED to defend zyklon and attack his innocent victim!

"He's not a pedophile for threatening to rape your kid! He's a LARP! It's a JOKE! HAHA!"

Quoting Bane while pinging her buddy, zyklon during the month-long threatening to rape srayzie's children

Suggesting that perhaps @srayzie was attacked because of her role in being a Q sub owner and being outgoing and friendly to everyone there... and buddying up to zyklon some more.

Also responsible for the subverse dedicated to plastering pictures that were not shared here all over a subverse dedicated to doxxing @srayzie. Again, an innocent victim of a pedophile that, for some reason, this sick individual decided to also target at the same time.

Expertshitposter

Admits @zyklon was still his buddy after making pedophilic, cannibalistic, and homicidal threats against children for over a month, multiple times a day.

you don't just turn your back on your buddies

I don't have buddies that think about sex acts against children multiple times a day for over a month, do you? Hell, I don't have buddies that even say shit like that. If I did, they wouldn't be my buddy anymore.

And you know what else? I wouldn't be friends with someone that was friends with a pedophile like that. Would you?

heygeorge

The guy that is happy to have the above names in his modlist, and more I've yet to post about. He really doesn't like the fact that I called him out for trying to paint the narrative that I was the one "stirring the pot" when he and his pedo crew have constantly posted about the srayzie incident for the past 7 months.

Whatever the case, his /v/SoapboxBanhammer sub is a wretched hive of scum and villainy, housing literal pedophiles and their buddies, and this should make you cautious of anyone posting there.

And now @Crensch waits for SBBH alts and friends to defend their pedo buddies above using absolutely zero links to support their claims and narratives.

Edit:

Aww, I didn't call it first, but here they are celebrating being listed as sick fucks. I bet they think this gets better for them if they pretend they don't care.