That’s not true at all. Regularly misinformation is posted here and often corrections aren’t offered either by OP or by the comment section, meaning people either don’t read the article at all or don’t look deeper for citation. Voat has low standards for accuracy on the whole, the only real strong suit is the lack of or at least very limited censorship relative to other platforms.
As early as a year ago, this wasn't so much the case. Now, however, it does seem to be true. The smart goats don't seem to be as active lately. I wonder why?
I didn't mean to suggest that there wasn't unreliable info. I meant that in the past, goats seemed to call out the unreliable info a lot more quickly and accurately.
view the rest of the comments →
Womb_Raider ago
That’s not true at all. Regularly misinformation is posted here and often corrections aren’t offered either by OP or by the comment section, meaning people either don’t read the article at all or don’t look deeper for citation. Voat has low standards for accuracy on the whole, the only real strong suit is the lack of or at least very limited censorship relative to other platforms.
zxcvzxcv ago
As early as a year ago, this wasn't so much the case. Now, however, it does seem to be true. The smart goats don't seem to be as active lately. I wonder why?
HuginnOgMuninn ago
wrong, I've been here for 4 years (I have had a few accounts compromised). There's always been unreliable info here.
Which is fine, most of the posts are a goldmine if you just vet it.
zxcvzxcv ago
I didn't mean to suggest that there wasn't unreliable info. I meant that in the past, goats seemed to call out the unreliable info a lot more quickly and accurately.