Posted automatically (#67769) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Crensch: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @ESOTERICshade)
Oh, seeking validation for your kike ways are you? You must really be short on allies to come slithering out here like you aren't a (((nefarious actor))).
You are just mad cuz you're a washed up whore so thirsty for attention, that contempt is better than loneliness or being ignored. That's why you made this post.
I have no contempt for you though. I pity you because you'll never amount to anything and you know it. You are a bad combinations of self-destructive and arrogant. Sucks to be you.
It is perfectly reasonable to ask for a mod team to be removed for failure to follow their own rules. When (((@crensch))) baits users into arguments and bans them with the backing of @MolochHunter for “hahahahahaha”, or some other BS reason, those mods need to be removed just as much as the deep state actors they emulate.
@crensch is nothing more than a washed up instagram THOT who cashed in on not being a lard barge after losing six million pounds. Now that her cash cow dried up, she revels in hook nosed glory at banning people from v/GreatAwakening. It’s sad, really, that her major achievement in life is showing off her hamburgular stretch marks while patriots make great contributions to society.
“Those who don’t produce see to rule over those who do” would be a fitting epitaph for her.
Refer back to my original post here. You’re a fame fan jewess looking for attention and power now that your fifteen minutes of reformed fatty fame ended.
You are assuming that your view of the issue is "the right one" and you have the "right" to ban someone.
This is the basis for dictatorship meaning that dictator says "I am right, you are wrong".
Spech must be free, the only restriction I would possibly put is that it must say verifiable truth with unfortunately the only exception of religion.....
You do not want to be on the other end of censorship, do you ? (there is no reason to assume that what you want to say will not be censored)
on the other hand, we have nearly every other subverse for complete, uncontrolled freedom. why even have distinct subverses if no one is allowed to keep a subverse on topic or free of clutter? there is, of course, a point where it does become unreasonable. but i think keeping a tidy sub is generally acceptable. and then we can complain about it in v/whatever.
not only that, but we can make our own topical subverses with all the blackjack/hookers/futurama references we want, with no moderation of any kind, and at any time.
at least, thats my thoughts on it. do we even really need distinct subverses at all, if all of them are just v/whatever?
public space like the entire rest of the site outside of the specific subverses that call for topical specificity, etc?
i just think its acceptable for subverse owners to keep em tidy of they like. we have plenty of places for uncontrolled free speech, as we should. i dont think we need to crusade subverse owners just because they dont like people takin massive dumps all over their nice metaphorical carpet. of course, its also okay to complain about it in v/whatever, and such.
You are assuming that your view of the issue is "the right one" and you have the "right" to ban someone.
Is that an assumption, or does the person with the button have that right?
This is the basis for dictatorship meaning that dictator says "I am right, you are wrong".
And?
Spech must be free, the only restriction I would possibly put is that it must say verifiable truth with unfortunately the only exception of religion.....
You're free to speak. I also have the freedom of association. Did you know communists are considered traitors by US law? Is that their speech that isn't free?
You do not want to be on the other end of censorship, do you ? (there is no reason to assume that what you want to say will not be censored)
What I want to say is already censored on most of the net. I have a right to allow what I want in places I own or create.
SearchVoatBot ago
This submission was linked from this v/pizzagatemods comment by @ESOTERICshade.
Posted automatically (#67769) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Crensch: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @ESOTERICshade)
TheAngryImperialist ago
In a forum of free speech, that which is right consistently and universally prevails by the strength of being true and unassailable.
In a forum of censorship, lies remain unopposed and unchallenged.
So it depends on your goals, I suppose. If you're going for "nefarious" then banning is a solid strategy.
Le_Squish ago
Oh, seeking validation for your kike ways are you? You must really be short on allies to come slithering out here like you aren't a (((nefarious actor))).
Crensch ago
Oh hey, it's the half-nigger sow that pops up when she feels the need to get slapped around again like her absent baby-daddy used to do to her.
Oh, I have the ultimate validation for this. Not you, nor any of your leftist buddies, can even begin to argue this.
Le_Squish ago
Oh, flinging random insults and hoping one sticks eh?
Aren't you going to ping an army of kikes to help you? We both know how you can't do anything by yourself and need a useful idiot to metastize to.
Crensch ago
Ehh, I can't imagine half-niggers have too much success with humans, so it's not that much of a stretch.
Do you mean metastasize, shitgoblin?
God you niggers can't even learn a human language, it'd be sad if you weren't such inhuman fucks.
NOMOCHOMO ago
A. "manipluater"
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2777433
B. "manipluater"
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2965667
C. "manipluater"
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3289546
....Crensch said without a trace of self-recognition
Le_Squish ago
You are just mad cuz you're a washed up whore so thirsty for attention, that contempt is better than loneliness or being ignored. That's why you made this post.
I have no contempt for you though. I pity you because you'll never amount to anything and you know it. You are a bad combinations of self-destructive and arrogant. Sucks to be you.
QualityShitposter ago
It is perfectly reasonable to ask for a mod team to be removed for failure to follow their own rules. When (((@crensch))) baits users into arguments and bans them with the backing of @MolochHunter for “hahahahahaha”, or some other BS reason, those mods need to be removed just as much as the deep state actors they emulate.
@crensch is nothing more than a washed up instagram THOT who cashed in on not being a lard barge after losing six million pounds. Now that her cash cow dried up, she revels in hook nosed glory at banning people from v/GreatAwakening. It’s sad, really, that her major achievement in life is showing off her hamburgular stretch marks while patriots make great contributions to society.
“Those who don’t produce see to rule over those who do” would be a fitting epitaph for her.
Crensch ago
I don't have to follow any rules. It's a shitposting subverse.
When are you thick-skulled leftists going to figure that out?
QualityShitposter ago
Nice deflection from your practice of baiting and banning as a mod. Just what I’d expect from a hook nosed gobliness.
Still sorry you were too fat to marry the doctor your mother always dreamed of?
Crensch ago
Deflection from what? What facet am I avoiding here?
QualityShitposter ago
Side view of your nose, perhaps?
Maybe that fucked up belly button?
Your lack of doing anything meaningful in life and not being able to even latch on to a husband’s accomplishments?
Crensch ago
That's what I'm deflecting from? Is that what's important to you?
QualityShitposter ago
Just shitposting to see how long before @crench’s law kicks in.
Crensch ago
Is that what's important to you?
QualityShitposter ago
Refer back to my original post here. You’re a fame fan jewess looking for attention and power now that your fifteen minutes of reformed fatty fame ended.
Crensch ago
Is it important to you that I refer to your original post here?
QualityShitposter ago
If you’re happily married to that scrunchy haired faggot why were you up in the middle of the night trying to get attention on the internet?
Did you enjoy the attention you got tonight? You seem to thrive on attention, so I’m happy to give it to you.
privacy_first ago
No, just ignore them.
It is too easy in electronic world to abuse a possible banning mechanism and go toward censorship
Crensch ago
Are you saying it's unreasonable or illegitimate?
And what's to stop the subversives from making themselves unignorable?
AbrahamGoldowitz ago
ANYONE I DISAGREE WITH IS SUBVERSIVE.
privacy_first ago
You are assuming that your view of the issue is "the right one" and you have the "right" to ban someone.
This is the basis for dictatorship meaning that dictator says "I am right, you are wrong".
Spech must be free, the only restriction I would possibly put is that it must say verifiable truth with unfortunately the only exception of religion.....
You do not want to be on the other end of censorship, do you ? (there is no reason to assume that what you want to say will not be censored)
xenoPsychologist ago
on the other hand, we have nearly every other subverse for complete, uncontrolled freedom. why even have distinct subverses if no one is allowed to keep a subverse on topic or free of clutter? there is, of course, a point where it does become unreasonable. but i think keeping a tidy sub is generally acceptable. and then we can complain about it in v/whatever.
not only that, but we can make our own topical subverses with all the blackjack/hookers/futurama references we want, with no moderation of any kind, and at any time.
at least, thats my thoughts on it. do we even really need distinct subverses at all, if all of them are just v/whatever?
privacy_first ago
Yes, there is a difference between "public space" and "private space"
In private space the "owner" sets the rules, in public space.... no, speech must be free (no beating, no shooting, just speech)
So, in a way we agree, just make sure that when you talk about "limiting" speech you are clear that you talk about "private space"
Remember that the "public space"must exist and be adequate, otherwise we are just kidding ourself
xenoPsychologist ago
public space like the entire rest of the site outside of the specific subverses that call for topical specificity, etc?
i just think its acceptable for subverse owners to keep em tidy of they like. we have plenty of places for uncontrolled free speech, as we should. i dont think we need to crusade subverse owners just because they dont like people takin massive dumps all over their nice metaphorical carpet. of course, its also okay to complain about it in v/whatever, and such.
Crensch ago
Is that an assumption, or does the person with the button have that right?
And?
You're free to speak. I also have the freedom of association. Did you know communists are considered traitors by US law? Is that their speech that isn't free?
What I want to say is already censored on most of the net. I have a right to allow what I want in places I own or create.
privacy_first ago
Whatever.....
Have a nice day
drj2 ago
Why do you think this?
Crensch ago
Why wouldn't it be? Rules are rules, and if a mod wants to make rules for comments, what makes that unreasonable or illegitimate?
QualityShitposter ago
Failure of mods to abide by those same rules...but (((obviously))) you’re above that.
Crensch ago
I am! Anyway, the point of this is comments are fair game.
QualityShitposter ago
Screencapped for trolling after you wake up with a hangover, alone, and wondering why there just aren’t any men worthy of you.
Crensch ago
Screencapped for keks when I need them.
drj2 ago
Is your argument really rules are rules and they must be followed?
Crensch ago
Well, sure.