Additionally I do not support nor will I ever support the sharing of personal information of a certain user without that user's expressed public authorization and that goes for more sensitive data as to public record data. I value the right of Voat's user base to have privacy and to deal with Voat matters within Voat.
Agreed. I've been away for personal reasons but I see a certain slimy individual going around stating that not only is there nothing wrong with it but he also claims to have compiled a bunch of people's identities/criminal histories and noone even seems to care much. Seems like something v/ProtectVoat should care about but I didn't see anyone calling him on his bullshit. Why is that?
I see a certain slimy individual going around stating that not only is there nothing wrong with it but he also claims to have compiled a bunch of people's identities/criminal histories and noone even seems to care much.
This is why I don't engage with that* user a lot. Just counted occasions. Also this is the same type of justification that Crensch does so again I don't support it. Personally I prefer to focus in the defense of the users that are affected by this behavior and inform the community about how to protect themselves.
Seems like something v/ProtectVoat should care about but I didn't see anyone calling him on his bullshit. Why is that?
So far from all the parties involved in all this nonsense, v/ProtectVoat is the only one that have defended both users affected by it. You can check my comment history. I was the one denouncing what was being posted on the anon subs about u/srayzie as I was the one who reported what was being done to u/GothamGirl. And from my private interactions with both u/Dismember and u/kevdude, we all believe the same. Personal information should be shared by 3rd parties without the authorization of the owner of that information when it regards Voat's user base. After all, anonymity is one of our main points. That you can express your views and opinions without being persecuted by them IRL.
So v/ProtectVoat will not support any behavior like that. But we will also not support the hypocritical denunciation done by an OP (Crensch) that has engaged in the same type of behavior and that has hurt the integrity of the platform with his actions. We stand by what we believe. And personally if I thought that it wasn't the case, I wouldn't have comeback as a mod/owner.
This is why I recused myself from the whole matter that he published on his post. I don't trust him anymore and I still have my suspicions about him and haven't been proven otherwise. So I prefer to focus on the informative part of the sub I collaborate with.
Are people still playing red team blue team here? It's fucking retarded.
Agreed, duality is one of the ways that the spirit of the enemy deals with: Red vs Blue, Black vs White, Man vs Woman. Divide and conquer. I have attempted to look for common ground so we all can work and move forward. I have explicitly asked for dialogue multiple times and I received empty answers from some and attacks, insults from others.
So in that regard you can think what you want but I will stand where my faith leads me to stand, always by the truth. Even when people attempt (poorly I might add) to attack my credibility.
view the rest of the comments →
sguevar ago
As expressed here: https://voat.co/v/ProtectGoats/3319514/19600788, and I quote:
That is my position on it.
SandHog ago
Agreed. I've been away for personal reasons but I see a certain slimy individual going around stating that not only is there nothing wrong with it but he also claims to have compiled a bunch of people's identities/criminal histories and noone even seems to care much. Seems like something v/ProtectVoat should care about but I didn't see anyone calling him on his bullshit. Why is that?
sguevar ago
Hope you are doing alright.
This is why I don't engage with that* user a lot. Just counted occasions. Also this is the same type of justification that Crensch does so again I don't support it. Personally I prefer to focus in the defense of the users that are affected by this behavior and inform the community about how to protect themselves.
So far from all the parties involved in all this nonsense, v/ProtectVoat is the only one that have defended both users affected by it. You can check my comment history. I was the one denouncing what was being posted on the anon subs about u/srayzie as I was the one who reported what was being done to u/GothamGirl. And from my private interactions with both u/Dismember and u/kevdude, we all believe the same. Personal information should be shared by 3rd parties without the authorization of the owner of that information when it regards Voat's user base. After all, anonymity is one of our main points. That you can express your views and opinions without being persecuted by them IRL.
So v/ProtectVoat will not support any behavior like that. But we will also not support the hypocritical denunciation done by an OP (Crensch) that has engaged in the same type of behavior and that has hurt the integrity of the platform with his actions. We stand by what we believe. And personally if I thought that it wasn't the case, I wouldn't have comeback as a mod/owner.
This is why I recused myself from the whole matter that he published on his post. I don't trust him anymore and I still have my suspicions about him and haven't been proven otherwise. So I prefer to focus on the informative part of the sub I collaborate with.
Agreed, duality is one of the ways that the spirit of the enemy deals with: Red vs Blue, Black vs White, Man vs Woman. Divide and conquer. I have attempted to look for common ground so we all can work and move forward. I have explicitly asked for dialogue multiple times and I received empty answers from some and attacks, insults from others.
So in that regard you can think what you want but I will stand where my faith leads me to stand, always by the truth. Even when people attempt (poorly I might add) to attack my credibility.