They are free to post their comments w/o deletion by me.
Just not at the Liberty HQ that is SMDC.
I normally do not limit posts that attack our liberty interests; however, Putt is using others to speak for him. Putt is not banned at SMDC. Nor have I tried to ban him.
So I am striking posts from individuals who doing so and are trying to shield Putt. IMO They are trying to post things that Putt wants to be posted but in which Putt can deny to avoid examination by us.
So I am not banning and deleting per se, I am demanding responsibility and accountability.
No actual fact nor evidence of the matter. One could argue that you may be right on your assumption but you can also be wrong.
And even if you were right, you have no right to suppress another user's right to speak their mind or whatever they were told to say.
The reason for the comments not to be deleted is for others to see the discussion and make their mimds about it. If you are concerned about u/virge shilling for put express it and try to rpove it but don't delete his comments.
Is all I am asking. You and O have discussed the enforcement of ambiguous rules on subverses opened for subjective interpretation at the whim of power moderation. I thought we were on the same page there. Why are you applying them then?
Because he's a subversive faggot for Israel like all the core of SBBH. They pretend to be for Freedom just like all Jews because it's extremely effective camo.
The post he deleted showed his outright lies, and that bothered team JIDF because he didn't do a very good job at masking his agenda. He lied outright about the feature Putt is developing, and he's not stupid so he did it intentionally.
Because he's a subversive faggot for Israel like all the core of SBBH. They pretend to be for Freedom just like all Jews because it's extremely effective camo.
I disagree with your premise here that u/Thelma is subversive and also that all of the SBBH members are also. Even u/Crensch expressed his vexing when he saw that the members of that subverse didn't back him up and appeared to have sided with u/zyklon_b (when in fact they didn't - most didn't like what u/srayzie was doing).
I do see however where the concerns of u/Thelma come from about you shilling for @Puttitout and I quote on that same comment I quoted then:
Either contribute to Voat growing and accept the admin's rules or get the fuck back to Reddit with the rest of the ShariaBlue crew where you belong, you useless lying subverting manipulative piece of shit parasite.
That is just a simple example of how you categorized me in the past. And yet here we are.
However I recognize your right to express yourself and criticise others as you wish. You also know that you stopped deleting your content less than a month ago. You have also engaged on power moderation against me: https://imgur.com/a/lZJRSPe for asking questions.
Now I am not here to engage in a debate with you on your trustworthiness or not. I am here to defend a user's right to express without suffering power moderation. Coincidentally you are that user. Hence I am also expressing my disappointment on seeing u/Thelma applying subjective rules on you when we discussed the danger of having them both on the site and on subverses:
The post he deleted showed his outright lies, and that bothered team JIDF because he didn't do a very good job at masking his agenda. He lied outright about the feature Putt is developing, and he's not stupid so he did it intentionally.
Even if you don't agree with those concerns, that doesn't make them any less valid. One day you will have to understand that instead of branding everyone that disagrees with you as subversive, alt or a supporter of the Synagogue of Satan.
u/Thelma might have had it wrong on his perception, or might have not. We can only wait until the feature is put in place in the general population.
view the rest of the comments →
sguevar ago
@Thelma... come on, comments shouldn't be deleted man... don't behave like the people we hate...
thelma ago
They are free to post their comments w/o deletion by me.
Just not at the Liberty HQ that is SMDC.
I normally do not limit posts that attack our liberty interests; however, Putt is using others to speak for him. Putt is not banned at SMDC. Nor have I tried to ban him.
So I am striking posts from individuals who doing so and are trying to shield Putt. IMO They are trying to post things that Putt wants to be posted but in which Putt can deny to avoid examination by us.
So I am not banning and deleting per se, I am demanding responsibility and accountability.
sguevar ago
As you stated it was in your opinion.
No actual fact nor evidence of the matter. One could argue that you may be right on your assumption but you can also be wrong.
And even if you were right, you have no right to suppress another user's right to speak their mind or whatever they were told to say.
The reason for the comments not to be deleted is for others to see the discussion and make their mimds about it. If you are concerned about u/virge shilling for put express it and try to rpove it but don't delete his comments.
Is all I am asking. You and O have discussed the enforcement of ambiguous rules on subverses opened for subjective interpretation at the whim of power moderation. I thought we were on the same page there. Why are you applying them then?
virge ago
Because he's a subversive faggot for Israel like all the core of SBBH. They pretend to be for Freedom just like all Jews because it's extremely effective camo.
The post he deleted showed his outright lies, and that bothered team JIDF because he didn't do a very good job at masking his agenda. He lied outright about the feature Putt is developing, and he's not stupid so he did it intentionally.
DAMAGE CONTROL MODE, ACTIVATED.
@crensch @womb_raider @kevdude @kestrel9
sguevar ago
I disagree with your premise here that u/Thelma is subversive and also that all of the SBBH members are also. Even u/Crensch expressed his vexing when he saw that the members of that subverse didn't back him up and appeared to have sided with u/zyklon_b (when in fact they didn't - most didn't like what u/srayzie was doing).
Also, you know perfectly well that I do not trust you and I have also been called subversive by you in the past: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3246318/18874209
I do see however where the concerns of u/Thelma come from about you shilling for @Puttitout and I quote on that same comment I quoted then:
That is just a simple example of how you categorized me in the past. And yet here we are.
However I recognize your right to express yourself and criticise others as you wish. You also know that you stopped deleting your content less than a month ago. You have also engaged on power moderation against me: https://imgur.com/a/lZJRSPe for asking questions.
Now I am not here to engage in a debate with you on your trustworthiness or not. I am here to defend a user's right to express without suffering power moderation. Coincidentally you are that user. Hence I am also expressing my disappointment on seeing u/Thelma applying subjective rules on you when we discussed the danger of having them both on the site and on subverses:
https://voat.co/v/whatever/3311332/19514586/10#19514586
This is why I am defending you.
Well on here I acknowledge his concern but reserved my judgements until I see it put in practice in the general population of Voat. Then I will express my opinion on it: https://voat.co/v/whatever/3313216/19532309/10#19532309. A user has a right to express his concerns u/virge just as I expressed mines many times about your push for "vote transparency" - most recent example: https://voat.co/v/whatever/3312482/19529663/10#19529663
Even if you don't agree with those concerns, that doesn't make them any less valid. One day you will have to understand that instead of branding everyone that disagrees with you as subversive, alt or a supporter of the Synagogue of Satan.
u/Thelma might have had it wrong on his perception, or might have not. We can only wait until the feature is put in place in the general population.