I'm not really sure if it happened or not as I don't care too much, but I do care about proving people wrong, so if anyone can hand me short digestible evidence that looks reliable enough so if someone says the holocaust was true, I could post link(s) that are short enough that you don't have to read for hours, but is also a website that looks modern and therefore feels more legit. (Not only am I lazy, others are lazy too)
From the bits I read it seems the gas chambers were for lice and and it is really odd that the one place added concrete over the massive graves preventing people from doing sonar or whatever, so I do see the possibility of it being fake (After all, the winners write the history books)
I'm not really sure if it happened or not as I don't care too much
Then fuck off.
so if anyone can hand me short digestible evidence that looks reliable enough so if someone says the holocaust was true, I could post link(s) that are short enough that you don't have to read for hours,
I could do this, but fuck off.
but is also a website that looks modern and therefore feels more legit. (Not only am I lazy, others are lazy too)
Really, fuck off.
From the bits I read it seems the gas chambers were for lice and and it is really odd that the one place added concrete over the massive graves preventing people from doing sonar or whatever, so I do see the possibility of it being fake (After all, the winners write the history books)
You're getting it, but not caring is what got us into this mess. Find a way to give a fuck; I have what you want, make it worth my while even linking you to it.
When people say the words "ad hominem" they almost invariably do not mean just 'to the person' literal translation of it, they are referencing the fallacy.
You, pedo, don't know what the fallacy is, or how it works. How do I know this?
First, because I'm smarter than you are. I'm more well-read, and I don't post edgy comments about not caring but wanting to prove others wrong.
Second, because I read the definition of the damn fallacy once upon a time.
Do you know what is required for invective to become an ad hominem fallacy? I do.
For it to be a FALLCY, I have to base some argument upon whatever flaw I am presenting about your person. "You're wrong about this because you're a Nazi!" "You can't be right about women because you're a man!"
Did you see anything even remotely resembling the above in my words? I'll answer that for you: no.
-
What you see there is nothing but invective, and has fuck-all to do with my arguments. Not a single argument of mine did I attempt to support by insulting you.
You wouldn't know this, because you're a cringeworthy little degenerate faggot that cannot be bothered to give a damn.
Oh, and since you really are quite retarded, the above line is not a fallacy because you, yourself, said you didn't give a damn. My mocking descriptive words were by no means a pillar upon which the original 4-word claim was predicated.
But you wouldn't understand that, either, I'm sure.
view the rest of the comments →
NymphantTree ago
I'm not really sure if it happened or not as I don't care too much, but I do care about proving people wrong, so if anyone can hand me short digestible evidence that looks reliable enough so if someone says the holocaust was true, I could post link(s) that are short enough that you don't have to read for hours, but is also a website that looks modern and therefore feels more legit. (Not only am I lazy, others are lazy too)
From the bits I read it seems the gas chambers were for lice and and it is really odd that the one place added concrete over the massive graves preventing people from doing sonar or whatever, so I do see the possibility of it being fake (After all, the winners write the history books)
Crensch ago
Then fuck off.
I could do this, but fuck off.
Really, fuck off.
You're getting it, but not caring is what got us into this mess. Find a way to give a fuck; I have what you want, make it worth my while even linking you to it.
NymphantTree ago
So you don't have it?
Thanks, gotcha.
Crensch ago
@Trigglypuff @kevdude @Vindicator @PeaceSeeker @srayzie
Thought you'd enjoy the laugh.
NymphantTree ago
That's a good argument actually
Crensch ago
Well, maybe this will help.
@Trigglypuff @kevdude @Vindicator @PeaceSeeker @srayzie
NymphantTree ago
Nice ad hominem
Crensch ago
When people say the words "ad hominem" they almost invariably do not mean just 'to the person' literal translation of it, they are referencing the fallacy.
You, pedo, don't know what the fallacy is, or how it works. How do I know this?
First, because I'm smarter than you are. I'm more well-read, and I don't post edgy comments about not caring but wanting to prove others wrong.
Second, because I read the definition of the damn fallacy once upon a time.
Do you know what is required for invective to become an ad hominem fallacy? I do.
For it to be a FALLCY, I have to base some argument upon whatever flaw I am presenting about your person. "You're wrong about this because you're a Nazi!" "You can't be right about women because you're a man!"
Did you see anything even remotely resembling the above in my words? I'll answer that for you: no.
-
What you see there is nothing but invective, and has fuck-all to do with my arguments. Not a single argument of mine did I attempt to support by insulting you.
You wouldn't know this, because you're a cringeworthy little degenerate faggot that cannot be bothered to give a damn.
Oh, and since you really are quite retarded, the above line is not a fallacy because you, yourself, said you didn't give a damn. My mocking descriptive words were by no means a pillar upon which the original 4-word claim was predicated.
But you wouldn't understand that, either, I'm sure.