I'm not really sure if it happened or not as I don't care too much, but I do care about proving people wrong, so if anyone can hand me short digestible evidence that looks reliable enough so if someone says the holocaust was true, I could post link(s) that are short enough that you don't have to read for hours, but is also a website that looks modern and therefore feels more legit. (Not only am I lazy, others are lazy too)
From the bits I read it seems the gas chambers were for lice and and it is really odd that the one place added concrete over the massive graves preventing people from doing sonar or whatever, so I do see the possibility of it being fake (After all, the winners write the history books)
I'm not really sure if it happened or not as I don't care too much
Then fuck off.
so if anyone can hand me short digestible evidence that looks reliable enough so if someone says the holocaust was true, I could post link(s) that are short enough that you don't have to read for hours,
I could do this, but fuck off.
but is also a website that looks modern and therefore feels more legit. (Not only am I lazy, others are lazy too)
Really, fuck off.
From the bits I read it seems the gas chambers were for lice and and it is really odd that the one place added concrete over the massive graves preventing people from doing sonar or whatever, so I do see the possibility of it being fake (After all, the winners write the history books)
You're getting it, but not caring is what got us into this mess. Find a way to give a fuck; I have what you want, make it worth my while even linking you to it.
Let me give you some advice; delete this account and lurk moar.
Now let me let you in on a little secret you wouldn't need to hear if you'd lurked moar:
Out of ANYONE on this website, I'm probably best-equipped to provide you with the resources you want. You thinking I don't have it is just about one of the most absurd claims one can make here.
I get pinged regularly to provide info or advice on JQ stuff; especially the Holohoax.
IMO, come back when you are disgusted with your current self and ready to give a fuck.
Basically telling me to leave because I had a different opinion, then making sure people see me as they will most likely downvote me that way I lose my ability to create posts. That doesn't sound like subtle censorship.
Basically telling me to leave because I had a different opinion
Do you enjoy being dishonest? In no way did I say that. I said lurk more; meaning that you'd probably be better served by shutting your fantastically stupid yap and absorbing information for a while.
You don't have a different opinion, you have a cringeworthy "I, like, totally don't care, dude" attitude that is nothing but an embarrassing indictment of your self awareness.
then making sure people see me as they will most likely downvote me that way I lose my ability to create posts. That doesn't sound like subtle censorship.
Nobody needs to downvote you; I can wreck you with my words alone. I can make you feel like such a useless and stupid piece of shit that you disappear without a single downvote being given.
I ping people for myriad reasons; not the least of which to help the person I'm responding to. I respect those I ping, and know they have certain communicative skills I do not. They might be able to get through to someone like you better than I can. More to the point, they're, for the most part, less overwhelming and more newbie-friendly than I am.
Originally, I pinged to help you. Now I ping because you're a loli pedo, and mockery is all you really deserve.
Illustrations of children in sexual positions and acts is not 'a different opinion', it's a mental illness. It's maladjusted to a healthy society. Maybe you can overcome it once you realize it was programmed into you by Jews, but right now you're just a sick fuck.
Keep telling yourself whatever you need to help you sleep at night.
It's rather funny, but your edit actually shows butthurt, where my words do not; but hey, keep up with that tone fallacy, since it makes you feel good.
NymphantTree, this really is not a good way to approach Voat. There are a lot of good people here who really value interesting discussion and genuine debate. Snark, laziness, entitlement and haughtiness are pretty much universally despised. Just an FYI.
Yeah Crensch is really giving me a genuine debate by just telling me to leave.
If lots of people on voat care about getting the truth of the holocaust not happening out to the people, then surely one of the aspects is making the proof easy to digest.
Instead, Crensch here just got angry that I dared to not agree completely with his point of view that he told me to leave. Then told his friends to come laugh at me instead of having a genuine debate like you said.
The comments I read didn't seem that way to me. I thought he was frustrated with the lack of clarity in what you were saying. (I had a hard time following it, as well.)
When people say the words "ad hominem" they almost invariably do not mean just 'to the person' literal translation of it, they are referencing the fallacy.
You, pedo, don't know what the fallacy is, or how it works. How do I know this?
First, because I'm smarter than you are. I'm more well-read, and I don't post edgy comments about not caring but wanting to prove others wrong.
Second, because I read the definition of the damn fallacy once upon a time.
Do you know what is required for invective to become an ad hominem fallacy? I do.
For it to be a FALLCY, I have to base some argument upon whatever flaw I am presenting about your person. "You're wrong about this because you're a Nazi!" "You can't be right about women because you're a man!"
Did you see anything even remotely resembling the above in my words? I'll answer that for you: no.
-
What you see there is nothing but invective, and has fuck-all to do with my arguments. Not a single argument of mine did I attempt to support by insulting you.
You wouldn't know this, because you're a cringeworthy little degenerate faggot that cannot be bothered to give a damn.
Oh, and since you really are quite retarded, the above line is not a fallacy because you, yourself, said you didn't give a damn. My mocking descriptive words were by no means a pillar upon which the original 4-word claim was predicated.
But you wouldn't understand that, either, I'm sure.
view the rest of the comments →
NymphantTree ago
I'm not really sure if it happened or not as I don't care too much, but I do care about proving people wrong, so if anyone can hand me short digestible evidence that looks reliable enough so if someone says the holocaust was true, I could post link(s) that are short enough that you don't have to read for hours, but is also a website that looks modern and therefore feels more legit. (Not only am I lazy, others are lazy too)
From the bits I read it seems the gas chambers were for lice and and it is really odd that the one place added concrete over the massive graves preventing people from doing sonar or whatever, so I do see the possibility of it being fake (After all, the winners write the history books)
Crensch ago
Then fuck off.
I could do this, but fuck off.
Really, fuck off.
You're getting it, but not caring is what got us into this mess. Find a way to give a fuck; I have what you want, make it worth my while even linking you to it.
NymphantTree ago
So you don't have it?
Thanks, gotcha.
Crensch ago
Let me give you some advice; delete this account and lurk moar.
Now let me let you in on a little secret you wouldn't need to hear if you'd lurked moar:
Out of ANYONE on this website, I'm probably best-equipped to provide you with the resources you want. You thinking I don't have it is just about one of the most absurd claims one can make here.
I get pinged regularly to provide info or advice on JQ stuff; especially the Holohoax.
IMO, come back when you are disgusted with your current self and ready to give a fuck.
NymphantTree ago
Oh delete my account and lurk.
Basically telling me to leave because I had a different opinion, then making sure people see me as they will most likely downvote me that way I lose my ability to create posts. That doesn't sound like subtle censorship.
Crensch ago
Do you enjoy being dishonest? In no way did I say that. I said lurk more; meaning that you'd probably be better served by shutting your fantastically stupid yap and absorbing information for a while.
You don't have a different opinion, you have a cringeworthy "I, like, totally don't care, dude" attitude that is nothing but an embarrassing indictment of your self awareness.
Nobody needs to downvote you; I can wreck you with my words alone. I can make you feel like such a useless and stupid piece of shit that you disappear without a single downvote being given.
I ping people for myriad reasons; not the least of which to help the person I'm responding to. I respect those I ping, and know they have certain communicative skills I do not. They might be able to get through to someone like you better than I can. More to the point, they're, for the most part, less overwhelming and more newbie-friendly than I am.
Originally, I pinged to help you. Now I ping because you're a loli pedo, and mockery is all you really deserve.
Illustrations of children in sexual positions and acts is not 'a different opinion', it's a mental illness. It's maladjusted to a healthy society. Maybe you can overcome it once you realize it was programmed into you by Jews, but right now you're just a sick fuck.
NymphantTree ago
God you are butthurt
Crensch ago
Keep telling yourself whatever you need to help you sleep at night.
It's rather funny, but your edit actually shows butthurt, where my words do not; but hey, keep up with that tone fallacy, since it makes you feel good.
Vindicator ago
NymphantTree, this really is not a good way to approach Voat. There are a lot of good people here who really value interesting discussion and genuine debate. Snark, laziness, entitlement and haughtiness are pretty much universally despised. Just an FYI.
NymphantTree ago
Yeah Crensch is really giving me a genuine debate by just telling me to leave.
If lots of people on voat care about getting the truth of the holocaust not happening out to the people, then surely one of the aspects is making the proof easy to digest.
Instead, Crensch here just got angry that I dared to not agree completely with his point of view that he told me to leave. Then told his friends to come laugh at me instead of having a genuine debate like you said.
Vindicator ago
The comments I read didn't seem that way to me. I thought he was frustrated with the lack of clarity in what you were saying. (I had a hard time following it, as well.)
Crensch ago
@Trigglypuff @kevdude @Vindicator @PeaceSeeker @srayzie
Thought you'd enjoy the laugh.
NymphantTree ago
That's a good argument actually
Crensch ago
Well, maybe this will help.
@Trigglypuff @kevdude @Vindicator @PeaceSeeker @srayzie
srayzie ago
Lol good catch. 😂
Derpfroot ago
That actually is funny. Made me chuckle.
NymphantTree ago
Nice ad hominem
Crensch ago
When people say the words "ad hominem" they almost invariably do not mean just 'to the person' literal translation of it, they are referencing the fallacy.
You, pedo, don't know what the fallacy is, or how it works. How do I know this?
First, because I'm smarter than you are. I'm more well-read, and I don't post edgy comments about not caring but wanting to prove others wrong.
Second, because I read the definition of the damn fallacy once upon a time.
Do you know what is required for invective to become an ad hominem fallacy? I do.
For it to be a FALLCY, I have to base some argument upon whatever flaw I am presenting about your person. "You're wrong about this because you're a Nazi!" "You can't be right about women because you're a man!"
Did you see anything even remotely resembling the above in my words? I'll answer that for you: no.
-
What you see there is nothing but invective, and has fuck-all to do with my arguments. Not a single argument of mine did I attempt to support by insulting you.
You wouldn't know this, because you're a cringeworthy little degenerate faggot that cannot be bothered to give a damn.
Oh, and since you really are quite retarded, the above line is not a fallacy because you, yourself, said you didn't give a damn. My mocking descriptive words were by no means a pillar upon which the original 4-word claim was predicated.
But you wouldn't understand that, either, I'm sure.