You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Artofchoke ago

Why attack the invaders, though? Their numbers are huge, and there will be more more more to replace them. There are people creating the situation. People who are legislating it, people who are financing it. Those are the appropriate targets. This is like killing individual fleas on a dog. You have to treat the cause.

Glory_Beckons ago

He wasn't going for the direct result of 50 fewer Moslems in one town in New Zealand.

He was going for the side-effects:

  • Force the powers that be into a knee-jerk acceleration of their totalitarian crackdown, making people on the fence tip the other way
  • Expose dishonesty and hypocrisy of media narratives, comparing coverage and tropes used here as opposed to when a Muslim does it
  • Bait adversaries into escalation, retaliation strikes (Utrecht shooting? Paris church fire?)
  • Draw attention to the fact that even a town called "Christchurch" at the end of the world is infested (nowhere to run; must stand and fight)
  • Manifesto is well thought out to red-pill normies (I suspect this is the only reason he avoided explicitly naming the Jew)
  • Everything about the video is designed to do what OP describes; it awakens something primal in men who watch it (there's a reason FPS are so popular)

He spent two years tailoring both his actions and the presentation to achieve these effects.

Bonus points for all the reactions ranging from "well that was bound to happen eventually" over "they kinda had it coming" and even "fucking finally", not only from a huge number among our people, but even from well known and/or highly placed personalities in media and governments. I don't think even he himself expected this level of support and endorsement.