EDIT. Got an answer. Move along people, nothing to see here.
There were no terms associated with this deal other than to help Voat succeed and to offer some resources to this end.
-Putt
/
For anyone out of the loop, two months ago Putt announced a secret investor for voat with vague details. Which you can read here https://voat.co/v/announcements/2934082
What we were told:
-
Voat has gotten a budget for staff and a partial budget for operation
-
Putt remains CEO
-
The investor wishes to be kept secret (I feel like I would want the same in their shoes)
-
And the Details of the deal have been kept off the table “at least until Voat gets acclimated to the
partnership and the newness fades.”
The only other thing I have heard from Putt that adds any good information is that both he and Atko retain majority ownership/control. While that’s a good thing, we still have no idea what they agreed too to secure this funding.
My argument is, while the anonymity of the investor is understandable secret, the only reason to continue to withhold the details of the agreement would be if there were some kind of malicious, foul, or some other stipulation that would be disagreeable to the community.
I have yet to see a single good reason to keep that information secret; and doing so completely undermines any notion of transparency. It seems the only way we will ever get that information is if the goats make a big stink. Which is why I am here to remind you all, again.
Unless @puttitout judges us as being acclimated enough to be told.
view the rest of the comments →
PuttItOut ago
While I naturally understand the concern (because you're not me), it makes me feel very unappreciated and untrusted when I've more or less dedicated and sacrificed my life to seeing to it that Voat succeeds and then come across posts like this demanding details when there are none, especially as if I haven't already proven my commitment to Voat over the last 5 years.
There were no terms associated with this deal other than to help Voat succeed and to offer some resources to this end. The 'Angel' that is on board is even more Free Speech than I am, so the conclusion that the only reason to not discuss details is because of malicious or foul intent is simply malicious on your part to imply such things.
Anyways, I have to get back to taking care of the mountains of work that I have to do.
Korinthian ago
Sorry putt, but moot showed similar dedication to 4chan. Hotwheels said he was dedicated to 8chan. We look to the past to judge the present. The idea that the angel is truly just a kind hearted patron of free speech is ludicrous from the kind of stuff weve seen. Too good to be true. If youve seen the matrix, they touch on this idea. People dont like pure and wholey good things. Theres always a catch, and when there isnt a catch, its only because we havent looked hard enough. Even when theres absolutely not a catch. Consider this if you talk to him again. Try to get a demand. It doesn't need to be big, just something to whine and complain about so we know this rug probably isnt going to be pulled out from under us.