Don't let this slip into the memory hole Goats, it's been two months since the Voat investment deal and we still have no details.

Don't let this slip into the memory hole Goats, it's been two months since the Voat investment deal and we still have no details. (whatever)

submitted 6.1 years ago by DrSelfAppointed

EDIT. Got an answer. Move along people, nothing to see here.

There were no terms associated with this deal other than to help Voat succeed and to offer some resources to this end.

-Putt

For anyone out of the loop, two months ago Putt announced a secret investor for voat with vague details. Which you can read here https://voat.co/v/announcements/2934082

What we were told:

Voat has gotten a budget for staff and a partial budget for operation
Putt remains CEO
The investor wishes to be kept secret (I feel like I would want the same in their shoes)
And the Details of the deal have been kept off the table “at least until Voat gets acclimated to the partnership and the newness fades.”

The only other thing I have heard from Putt that adds any good information is that both he and Atko retain majority ownership/control. While that’s a good thing, we still have no idea what they agreed too to secure this funding.

My argument is, while the anonymity of the investor is understandable secret, the only reason to continue to withhold the details of the agreement would be if there were some kind of malicious, foul, or some other stipulation that would be disagreeable to the community.

I have yet to see a single good reason to keep that information secret; and doing so completely undermines any notion of transparency. It seems the only way we will ever get that information is if the goats make a big stink. Which is why I am here to remind you all, again.

Unless @puttitout judges us as being acclimated enough to be told.

189 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

NotHereForPizza 6.1 years ago

Do you know anything about Putt? Any personal details?

Why would some other entity owning it make any kind of difference?

A simple question now arises, after that line of thinking: why did Putt inform us that another partner was now being added?

Why does it matter, without us ever having known who Putt is, if another partner is dealt in?

What does Putt adding a partner tell you? What other major shift occurred on the site right around the time Putt made the announcement?

link

drstrangegov 6.1 years ago

Dude, we know all about you. You're so spooky I feel like I should salute when I see your posts. And I've never been in the military. I'm in your head, and there are nasty things in here.