Yeah, this is all just a big joke to you v/SoapBoxBanHammer SRS Reddit kikes isn't it. You're finally getting exactly what you wanted. Congratulations. You have managed to subvert one of the very few places on the internet where free speech still exists.
They think that average Voaters don't see it, and I'm at the point where I can't even disagree. Hardly anyone will see this thread, and people blindly follow Putt, even though it could be literally anyone on the other end of that account. It could be the FBI, CIA, could be anyone -- but people just follow him like SJWs follow Channing Tatum. It's celebrity psychology, and it's really disappointing to see it here on Voat of all places.
Putt should understand 100% why people would be skeptical and nervous about this, and instead of fucking demodding Bob he should have tried to reassure him.
And who are you? You literally could be nobody! You sorta are already, LOL. Accountability for all mods of all subs save for private subs. Get use to it, nigger.
Trust goes both ways. If you cannot comprehend that then you are also the type of slow faggots who believe moderators should not be held accountable cuz "my sub my rules waaaah." Who cares if putt removed a janitor of a system sub? He's not impeding that user's free speech and if you think he is then LOL. Just wow.
Give me a compelling reason why we should trust a stranger on the Internet who could be literally anyone. For all we know Putt is actually several people, operating out of three letter agencies. I'm not saying that's the case, but it's 100% a possibility. There's all sorts of strange stuff on Voat, just look at the financing, which now is apparently not an issue because we have a partner, but up until what a few days ago, no one knew how Voat was even operating. Putt said there was some bitcoin donations left over from what, over a year ago?
All that said, we shouldn't be irrationally paranoid, but we shouldn't blindly trust one another either. Having a plan incase shit hits the fan is not being irrationally paranoid. We should, every single one of us, consider what we would do if Voat was taken down or taken over.
And frankly, Putt shouldn't expect us to blindly trust him. If you were operating Voat, would you act that way?
You guys are 100% sounding like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. You're regurgitating a script, and I can't even tell your comment apart from your compatriots. So quoted above is my response to one of your friends who said practically the exact same thing you did. He refused to give me an actual response to anything I said, can I assume you will do precisely the same thing?
If you have that sort of doubt and lack of faith, why are you still using this site? Phuks and poal would love to have your type.
What if Putt is compromised? What would you do? Feel good about your life by screaming to no one in particular "I told you soooo waaaah"?
What is your plan? To start a new site? Why not do it now since you are already screeching about how Putt sold voat out!
You know what my plan is if this ship finally sinks? Wouldn't be screeching it to you lot.
If voat was my creation I'd have done the same as Putt. Why? Cuz it'd be my site to do as I pleased with and so far that is not a breach of trust - if he had sitewide banned the faggot, you'd have a leg to stand on screeching whatever it is you are white knighting about. But he didn't.
Because I don't give up on stuff that matters, like freedom of speech.
What if Putt is compromised? What would you do? Feel good about your life by screaming to no one in particular "I told you soooo waaaah"?
No, I'd be pretty disappointed. Definitely wouldn't spout any told you so's. The reason I try to bring attention to this stuff is because I'm against manipulation and deceit. I understand why you're making the assumptions you are, but that's just not where I'm coming from.
If voat was my creation I'd have done the same as Putt. Why? Cuz it'd be my site to do as I pleased
If voat was your creation, it most likely never would have gained the community that Voat currently has, because attitudes such as "It'd be my site to do as I pleased" isn't actually respected by anyone, so yeah, you would control a dead website. The fact that you're parading that around is honestly very strange.
So far - voat is still up, free speech is still vital, the site is still running and who cares if it has a silent financial backer as long as they stay that way? Why worry about something that has not even happened yet?
All you are doing is rabble rousing. "Putt demodded a janitor of a system sub waaaah".
If we're a free speech community, why don't we have the freedom of speech to question the community?
The reason I use this account name is because as much as I disagreed with Sanes methods, he had a fucking point most of the time. Well, at least half of the time. Ish.
Just as the founding fathers told us to rebel if necessary, we as Voaters need to at the very least be critical. Many users of this website would have their lives potentially ruined if what they said was made public. As we've seen time and time again, those that oppose us try very hard to attack us and attempt to ruin our lives all the damn time.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with questioning how the website operates, even up to questioning Putt himself. Putt should actually expect to be questioned, especially when bringing in a new partner.
who cares if it has a silent financial backer as long as they stay that way?
As long as they stay that way.
Bobs entire post was predicated on the possibility that it might become compromised. Everything he said was about if something happened. Either way, even if he was saying that he believed the website was compromised, and that the silent backer was malicious, who cares. I mean to be fair neither of us can say whether he's correct or wrong, but let's just assume he was wrong. Where's the harm in it? What's so bad about being overly cautious? I really don't understand why on a website like Voat, people behaving like Preppers are being attacked.
view the rest of the comments →
zyklon_b ago
Good work @Puttitout
SaneGoatOySwear ago
Yeah, this is all just a big joke to you v/SoapBoxBanHammer SRS Reddit kikes isn't it. You're finally getting exactly what you wanted. Congratulations. You have managed to subvert one of the very few places on the internet where free speech still exists.
C_Corax ago
It's not a joke. It's a carefully executed plan.
SaneGoatOySwear ago
They think that average Voaters don't see it, and I'm at the point where I can't even disagree. Hardly anyone will see this thread, and people blindly follow Putt, even though it could be literally anyone on the other end of that account. It could be the FBI, CIA, could be anyone -- but people just follow him like SJWs follow Channing Tatum. It's celebrity psychology, and it's really disappointing to see it here on Voat of all places.
Putt should understand 100% why people would be skeptical and nervous about this, and instead of fucking demodding Bob he should have tried to reassure him.
15773972? ago
And who are you? You literally could be nobody! You sorta are already, LOL. Accountability for all mods of all subs save for private subs. Get use to it, nigger.
SaneGoatOySwear ago
Accountability for... wanting to be careful in the event that Voat ends up being compromised?
15774189? ago
Trust goes both ways. If you cannot comprehend that then you are also the type of slow faggots who believe moderators should not be held accountable cuz "my sub my rules waaaah." Who cares if putt removed a janitor of a system sub? He's not impeding that user's free speech and if you think he is then LOL. Just wow.
SaneGoatOySwear ago
You guys are 100% sounding like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. You're regurgitating a script, and I can't even tell your comment apart from your compatriots. So quoted above is my response to one of your friends who said practically the exact same thing you did. He refused to give me an actual response to anything I said, can I assume you will do precisely the same thing?
15774463? ago
If you have that sort of doubt and lack of faith, why are you still using this site? Phuks and poal would love to have your type.
What if Putt is compromised? What would you do? Feel good about your life by screaming to no one in particular "I told you soooo waaaah"?
What is your plan? To start a new site? Why not do it now since you are already screeching about how Putt sold voat out!
You know what my plan is if this ship finally sinks? Wouldn't be screeching it to you lot.
If voat was my creation I'd have done the same as Putt. Why? Cuz it'd be my site to do as I pleased with and so far that is not a breach of trust - if he had sitewide banned the faggot, you'd have a leg to stand on screeching whatever it is you are white knighting about. But he didn't.
I'm sorry your autism makes change hard for you.
SaneGoatOySwear ago
Because I don't give up on stuff that matters, like freedom of speech.
No, I'd be pretty disappointed. Definitely wouldn't spout any told you so's. The reason I try to bring attention to this stuff is because I'm against manipulation and deceit. I understand why you're making the assumptions you are, but that's just not where I'm coming from.
If voat was your creation, it most likely never would have gained the community that Voat currently has, because attitudes such as "It'd be my site to do as I pleased" isn't actually respected by anyone, so yeah, you would control a dead website. The fact that you're parading that around is honestly very strange.
Cheers.
15774831? ago
So far - voat is still up, free speech is still vital, the site is still running and who cares if it has a silent financial backer as long as they stay that way? Why worry about something that has not even happened yet?
All you are doing is rabble rousing. "Putt demodded a janitor of a system sub waaaah".
SaneGoatOySwear ago
If we're a free speech community, why don't we have the freedom of speech to question the community?
The reason I use this account name is because as much as I disagreed with Sanes methods, he had a fucking point most of the time. Well, at least half of the time. Ish.
Just as the founding fathers told us to rebel if necessary, we as Voaters need to at the very least be critical. Many users of this website would have their lives potentially ruined if what they said was made public. As we've seen time and time again, those that oppose us try very hard to attack us and attempt to ruin our lives all the damn time.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with questioning how the website operates, even up to questioning Putt himself. Putt should actually expect to be questioned, especially when bringing in a new partner.
As long as they stay that way.
Bobs entire post was predicated on the possibility that it might become compromised. Everything he said was about if something happened. Either way, even if he was saying that he believed the website was compromised, and that the silent backer was malicious, who cares. I mean to be fair neither of us can say whether he's correct or wrong, but let's just assume he was wrong. Where's the harm in it? What's so bad about being overly cautious? I really don't understand why on a website like Voat, people behaving like Preppers are being attacked.
C_Corax ago
Putt is not on your side:)