Fair warning to my fellow goats - Account anonymity in anon subs is a fallacy and what you write can and will get used against you. (whatever)

submitted ago by NeedleStack

This post is an advisory to users that your username is connected to whatever you write in anon subs.

What you write can be seen by one or more devs who’ve been given that special access. But what you may not know is that they can and do use it against you as they’ve done with me in the past and as recently as yesterday. And one or more of those users who have this ability are part of SBBH.

Some history: One of the SBBH members had a hissy fit with me over a year ago and is probably the same user who would “miraculously” happen to know it was me when I would write certain things in anon subs in the past. I’d write something and they’d make a snarky remark revealing that they knew were talking to my account. It wasn’t a huge deal but it made me aware that my username could be seen by one or more users with this special access.

Back to present day: I’d never bothered to get caught up in SBBH drama until about a week ago when I started needling them in anon subs with a comment here or there regarding their questionable activities on voat.

It didn’t take long for one of them to take the bait and clearly refer to me when making this remark about my recent comments:

http://archive.is/eBPYZ

My account is exactly 2.7 years old. Whoever wrote that comment was a fool; for so obviously ‘giving away’ that they could see it was me writing those comments (showing their hand), and to give such a sensitive shit over what I wrote (notice it took anti-SBBH comments for them to get fresh and reveal themselves).

Let this story be a warning to any of you that this ‘special access’ to see which user is writing “anon” comments creates an unfair advantage and in the wrong hands can be used against you. At the same time, these privileged few are able to enjoy the ability to hide in anon subs themselves.

@PuttItOut, users will never be free to “have their say” in anon subs until everyone but you is stripped of the ability to see who’s posting what in so-called anon subs.

--

Edit: Hey, cool! My post got a "Speculation" flair. Perhaps the first in voat's history in v/Whatever.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

12390159? ago

I am not aware of any special access to anon subverses; as far as I know only Putt has such access. Maybe Cyna. But SBBH users? I really don't think so. The closest thing to evidence of this claim I see is your archive, but that's just a complaint about 2.7 year old accounts, of which there are very many, more than any other cohort, in fact. The fact that someone referred to 2.7 year old accounts when your account is 2.7 years old might only mean that they have observed a trend among 2.7 year old accounts hating on SBBH. It's had to say. I agree the comment seems out of place and is suspicious, but I cannot conclude from that alone that SBBH accounts have the ability to see who is posting in anon subverses.

NeedleStack ago

It would take our dear Putt himself to come into this thread and tell me I'm wrong to change my mind. That is, if he's not a shared account (I personally don't believe his account is shared). If he says I'm incorrect, so be it.

MadWorld ago

It would take our dear Putt himself to come into this thread and tell me I'm wrong to change my mind.

Just a note on an imposter account(https://voat.co/user/PuttItOul/comments), make sure to verify that he is truly PuttItOut if he replies.