Given the quality of most of his arguments, he may not be a troll at all but a reverse shill. A reverse shill being one who "shills" for one side extremely poorly in order to drive people away from that side with the low quality of their arguments.
The SPLC should be the least of your problems. For instance, in this post (https://voat.co/v/pics/1822976/8924368)), you are spreading hate speech by discriminating against our immigrants. If you continue to spread hate speech, I will be forced to report you for inciting violence against other Americans.
Report to whom, you cock-gargling faggot? The Feels Police?
Every single thing I posted in the thread you linked is protected by the First Amendment.
As the SCOTUS recently ruled, there is no exception for "hate speech" in the First Amendment. Furthermore, "hate speech" is so ill defined that the term is essentially meaningless.
There is no "discrimination" of immigrants whatsoever in that post, either. There is a stated disgust for illegal aliens, but those aren't immigrants. They're criminals.
"Our" immigrants? So you're saying you ShareBlue faggots own them? They're your slaves?
Telling criminals to follow the law or leave is not incitement to anything other than (surprise, surprise) following the law or getting the fuck out.
Telling other Americans to report illegal criminals to ICE is telling people to follow the law.
So what, exactly, are you going to report? You can cry "hate speech" all you want, but that doesn't make it actionable. But you know what? You're welcome to the same invitation I gave the illegals, which is GET. THE. FUCK. OUT. You want hate speech? I hate you.
IN CONCLUSION:@JohnCStevenson, you are a useless stain on the world. The semen-crusted sock at the bottom of humanity's laundry hamper. The brown streak left on the mattress when a deathfat shits the bed. Your posts have been some of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent diatribes were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on Voat is now dumber for having read your posts. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
I get on average -12.8 CCP PER DAY! @She only gets an average of -3.4 per day. Look for me to be the all time low very soon... I've only been on here for 4 months and for the record, I VOTED TRUMP NIGGERFAGGOTS
Shareblue, formerly known as Blue Nation Review, is an American left-wing news website owned by the journalist and political activist David Brock. The website is headed by former Clinton staffer Peter Daou. Shareblue is within a consortium of political groups in Democratic strategist David Brock’s network that will raise a roughly $40 million budget to oppose President Donald Trump's policies.
You fucking bastard! I love it! I was gonna ping you but then I realized you posted it. Fucking guy! 😂😂😂😂😂😂
This shit is fucking gold. "There will be legal ramifications!" Dude, I cannot laugh any harder at this. I have to work all weekend and this just had me in tears. Fucking bravo, bravo. You had that faggot so butthurt, especially the part where he said he was reporting you for calling him a faggot! Fucking priceless. @johncstevenson you're voats new sane. Someone had to take the torch and you took it right up your faggotty ass.
The more I read about that guy, the more I'm cheering for him.
Highest comment is 0. ZERO.
Like, holy fuck. Can't even go into non-polarized sub and be all "Yeah, the Pixies were pretty cool" or "Next year I might try growing my own tomatoes"... something, anything. Politics is fine - used to not care, but got way into it (thanks, Voat. Fuckers.) But there's more to life - and Voat.
Civil discourse is great, but let's take care of our gardens, our literature, music and entertainment as well... I guess you can politicize those, too, though. Fuck you guys, then.
Yes. You could be doing something productive, such as trying to get our illegitimate president impeached. Unfortunately, Voaters dislike the truth, and I have been downvoted for pointing out how Russia is undermining American democracy. My SCP is -373, and my CCP is at -2187. @NeedleStack has continually been harassing me, and @PuttItOut hasn't listened to my request for a temporary ban for him.
It’s easy to see why: the site’s hardline policy on free expression manifests largely as communities advertisers and venture capitalists would be loath to touch, like TransPeopleHate, TeenGirls, YoungLadies, and StunningJailbait. Since Reddit’s first cleansing, Voat has also become the de facto home of other banned groups like celebrity nude hack community the Fappening, widely debunked pedophilia conspiracists Pizzagate, and the white nationalist of the Alt-Right subreddit.
I donno. There's some cool - and very, very dead (poor v/moviesuggestions ...and roller rinks.) - things out there that we can somewhat agree on if we look. Or, reading someone's stories or suggestions is cool, too. The brain needs to refresh from headbutting too much, me thinks.
If he's actually not a SB shill, eventually overtime he will be redpilled. There will be built up cognitive dissonance to think his side actually has any arguments.
There should be a threshold for down votes. Once you reach so many, your account should be automatically disabled, period. They can always make another, but that would at least make these shills work for a living - LOL
There should be a threshold for down votes. Once you reach so many, your account should be automatically disabled, period. They can always make another, but that would at least make these shills work for a living - LOL
Oh yea... we believe in free speech as long as its speech we agree with. Right?
I could think of far too many ways that that's possible to abuse and be turned against us. Pizzagaters were downvoted en masse by stealth accounts once, and it could become a legit tactic for censorship. It's also a complete waste of voat's available usernames. Let them comment, however maybe apply some lighter penalties. (like I belive they already have)
I am vehemently against deleting thr accounts of those whose opinions we strongly disagree with. That would be one small step for policy and one giant leap toward reddit. As I understand things, the pioneers in the first exodus that became Voat could have simply created new accounts and continued to post themselves. That's a real slippery slope.
Uhh yeah, why do you think he's being downvoated? Obviously people don't agree with him.
and you know it
I'll go ahead and assume that you think he is a shill. Even if that were true, you don't get to decide who does and doesn't get to post on this website. Aka, having your say.
But I'll go ahead and let you know, that account is a fucking joke. An annoying one, but it's still active because people freak out about him and we have posts like this showing up on the front page every week. He's a troll, he has the right to be here, and you're feeding him.
On this one, I think he is meaning that once they hit, say, -2k ccp (i would put it at 1k), that the account is a troll and it is essentially useless. Not for dessenting proposes, but to keep those trying to make a negative record for shits and giggles. Just my two cents though.
Yeah, dont get me wrong. I definitely see where you are going with it, and sure, I dont like those that dv just because they dont like someone, but at some point, if the person goes that far with random shenanigans, i can see it being a fruitless endeavour. Honestely, if you manage to make ti to -1k, you have to be trying. Not slippery sloping it on this one, and i do believe it exists.
I am not the one dving, by the by, and could honestly care less over all. The only reason I threw up the idea was because of trolling competitions, but it really doesnt affect me at all. I am fine either way no matter how it plays out. I generally enjoy flipping through the dv'd posts, but can see where the negative competitions can encourage many to just be a bit annoying. Again, doesnt bither me one way or the other. Just a suggestion.
Yeah, probably. I rarely dv, and only to those pulling shit off topic. This whole post really is a bit of a non issue in the grand scheme of things.
I do agree though. Everyone should have the ability to post. It is just the "trolling for no other reason than the lols" thing that I could care less about, but again, it really doesnt bother me one way or another. They can keep up doing their thing, but wont bother me much.
<3 you nonetheless though, man. Keep on keeping on.
I love this place for these types of conversations and hate when you get the ideologs in the middle that try to turn every slight disagreement into a war. It is nice to have a constructive plave to say what you like with someone you disagree with and still like eachother at the end of the day.
Sorry for the rant, but it is refreshing, unlike shit happenening on the IRL server. I really do appreciate what you do man.
Yes I gotta agree with these guys. There is a big difference between someone who has a general unpopular opinion, but still contributing value to the discussions.. Versus someone with literally thousands of negative votes. Idk the best way to do it or if anything should be done at all.. Just pointing out the difference in a troll that is tarnishing a discussion/thread and a left wing liberal posting thoughtful disagreement.
Hell, I never cared if someone dissents. Everyone's opinion has value. That's called free speech. I may not agree with you, but I don't down vote for that or let it bother me. I simply don't up vote ya ... that's my way of saying I disagree. But hey, if someone has thousands of down votes from others, that's above and beyond and dips into the realm of a spammer or troll, not someone voicing a legitimate argument for a position. No one accumulates that bad a reputation because they simply disagree. At least that's my thought.
I suggested that spammers should need to work to irritate us ... nothing more. My suggestion won't be implemented, you and I both know that ... sorry I ruffled your feathers, but if someone is being paid to flood Voat with nonsense ... spam us, what I said has merit in my mind ... however, I also know Voat well enough that that won't happen. BTW, to insinuate that I'm somehow anti-free speech or not a staunch supporter of Voat values due to an off the cuff remark is irritating in it's own right.
I just think that this website is great because you can say whatever the fuck you want. It doesn't matter what you think or what I think or what he thinks, we can all say it.
I think that what you're suggesting is detrimental to that. I don't think that it's even really the first step in the wrong direction though.
Can't you just ban him? If he so awful, couldn't everyone who doesn't like him just banned him. I think a lot of people actually do enjoy his presence, gives them a false sense of importance.
I think he is a joke, a troll who loves the reaction he is getting. It's just so obvious. Have you seen the guys posts? Seems pretty fake
Don't know why someone down voted ya - LOL - but will balance that out. Yeah, probably a troll. Have a great Sunday, I've been screwin' off and haven't been here much today.
No biggie ... like I just made an off the cuff remark and a bunch of users I never heard of were jumpin' all over me (not you, we're regulars - LOL) ... so I got a tad defensive. Too late in the evening, I suppose when that went down. We're cool - LOL
I didn't realize you were defending your own alternate account. It makes sense now. And omg I'm new here! The shame! How will I live with this scarlet letter upon my breast!?! You stink because you are a nigger faggot and not the good kind.
What are you writing a book? Get off my nuts. Everything you say is a waste. You think trolls have a legitimate right to reverse arguments, but you turn all pissy when someone fucks with you? Fuck off.
I agree everyone should have a right to speak.. Even if they have a mental illness. However isn't there something a little "off" about a paid shill who dedicates their time here to troll instead of being useful and contributing valuable content/conversation? The getting paid part is especially what makes things a little different.
LOL - you do gotta give him that. Funny you should mention him though. I got a comment from him an hour ago or so for mentioning to someone who was concerned his ilk were spamming Voat. I gave whoever the advise to reportspammers and let them sort it out, if they thought it was legit spam ... he was unhappy with my advice - LOL. He's a vocal dude for sure. But hasn't responded back when I explained I just advised. f ya don't like it, complain to anyone who actually does report ya. I just provided them an avenue to vent. BTW ... do those guys get paid to shill? Just curious, I generally ignore their nonsensical BS.
I kind of want to sign up. Like do an account, that everyone knows is a shill, and just post random bullshit. And get paid to voat. On one hand, it could be useful just to know what their agenda is. And I wouldn't feel bad because everyone knows it's a shill account.
You'd probably be obligated to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement that would prevent you from letting others know you are a shill account. And if you violated the terms you could get sued/fined and lose since you signed the NDA.
Interesting, thanks. Leftist are the most humorless, obnoxious folk around. It's always a pleasure for me when I do engage them, to know that I've left them steaming - LOL> But more times than not, it isn't worth the bother ... it's more fun messing with the heads of trolls most days.
junesunflower ago
Oh we got these two beat easily. My sisters and I are easily over -4,000 CCP if you add up all of our accounts.
Edit: -6,524 over 14 accounts.
Rellik88 ago
Well you got the classic Month+Noun SB naming scheme.
Eleutheria ago
>Sisters
Putting on various wigs while re-enacting the cross-dressing scene from Silence of the Lambs doesn't count.
Fambida ago
Given the quality of most of his arguments, he may not be a troll at all but a reverse shill. A reverse shill being one who "shills" for one side extremely poorly in order to drive people away from that side with the low quality of their arguments.
Argumentative ago
No, because sharia blue can't do anything right or interesting of any note
NeedleStack ago
Well, eat your words honey bunny because John did it! He beat @she's record!
Argumentative ago
Well shit, guess I'm #sharebluemissle now
facevalue ago
My thoughts too.
Kal ago
I was trying at one point but I couldn't get the protectvoat cunts to bite.
uvulectomy ago
Formerly Blue Nation Review? I thought it was a re-branded Correct The Record?
uvulectomy ago
Oh @NeedleStack...you're just itching for him to report you to the SPLC, aren't you? =P
JohnCStevenson ago
The SPLC should be the least of your problems. For instance, in this post (https://voat.co/v/pics/1822976/8924368)), you are spreading hate speech by discriminating against our immigrants. If you continue to spread hate speech, I will be forced to report you for inciting violence against other Americans.
uvulectomy ago
Report to whom, you cock-gargling faggot? The Feels Police?
Every single thing I posted in the thread you linked is protected by the First Amendment.
So what, exactly, are you going to report? You can cry "hate speech" all you want, but that doesn't make it actionable. But you know what? You're welcome to the same invitation I gave the illegals, which is GET. THE. FUCK. OUT. You want hate speech? I hate you.
IN CONCLUSION: @JohnCStevenson, you are a useless stain on the world. The semen-crusted sock at the bottom of humanity's laundry hamper. The brown streak left on the mattress when a deathfat shits the bed. Your posts have been some of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent diatribes were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on Voat is now dumber for having read your posts. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
KosherHiveKicker ago
Add me to that list please. I would consider it a badge of honor!
BlockMe ago
Amateurs!
Beat @elusiveposter with his -3564 CCP
TrueAmerican ago
I get on average -12.8 CCP PER DAY! @She only gets an average of -3.4 per day. Look for me to be the all time low very soon... I've only been on here for 4 months and for the record, I VOTED TRUMP NIGGERFAGGOTS
TrueAmerican ago
How about if you factor in how long their accounts have been around? I have -1558 but have not been on here very long...
The_Duke_of_Dabs ago
Yes, sir! Absolute no, no.
Anson ago
What is shareblue?
hats_ ago
Wiki source.
junesunflower ago
Shareblue is a news website that gives information these pussies hate because it makes them look like the dumbfuck republican toadies they are.
Anson ago
Obvious bait is obvious
Either that or you're emotionally immature
junesunflower ago
Shareblue is a substantially more reliable information source that ShitFart, InfoWarts, and Fox News.
But I am sure a retarded as fuck voat user like you actually thinks otherwise.
Anson ago
should say ShiteFart instead haha.
I actually don't pay attention to any of those sources.
Fambida ago
Share Blue is a far left propaganda outfit and the successor to Correct The Record.
Anson ago
Ugh
The_Duke_of_Dabs ago
You fucking bastard! I love it! I was gonna ping you but then I realized you posted it. Fucking guy! 😂😂😂😂😂😂 This shit is fucking gold. "There will be legal ramifications!" Dude, I cannot laugh any harder at this. I have to work all weekend and this just had me in tears. Fucking bravo, bravo. You had that faggot so butthurt, especially the part where he said he was reporting you for calling him a faggot! Fucking priceless. @johncstevenson you're voats new sane. Someone had to take the torch and you took it right up your faggotty ass.
NeedleStack ago
My darling Johnny boy did it! He finally beat @she's CCP count! He must be so proud!
The_Duke_of_Dabs ago
It's almost beautiful.
RapeKathy6riffin ago
Will someone explain Shareblue and their agenda in 133 characters?
go1dfish ago
Shareblue is a left leaning news organization run by former Clinton staffers who's agenda is to elect Democrats to office in the US.
The_Duke_of_Dabs ago
They shill (try to influence) public/popular opinion boards/websites; to get their message out over others it's like a game of; "who can be louder?"
140 characters edit that shit to your own devices
Slayfire122 ago
You got a long way to go before you can compete for the lowest ccp.
0011011000111001 ago
Hes been working pretty hard for it hah
hats_ ago
The more I read about that guy, the more I'm cheering for him.
Highest comment is 0. ZERO.
Like, holy fuck. Can't even go into non-polarized sub and be all "Yeah, the Pixies were pretty cool" or "Next year I might try growing my own tomatoes"... something, anything. Politics is fine - used to not care, but got way into it (thanks, Voat. Fuckers.) But there's more to life - and Voat.
Civil discourse is great, but let's take care of our gardens, our literature, music and entertainment as well... I guess you can politicize those, too, though. Fuck you guys, then.
rocketrouser ago
Got to love when one of his "top" comments is reporting someone for saying faggot. Real Goat material there!
Slayfire122 ago
There is?!?!?!?
JohnCStevenson ago
Yes. You could be doing something productive, such as trying to get our illegitimate president impeached. Unfortunately, Voaters dislike the truth, and I have been downvoted for pointing out how Russia is undermining American democracy. My SCP is -373, and my CCP is at -2187. @NeedleStack has continually been harassing me, and @PuttItOut hasn't listened to my request for a temporary ban for him.
This is why Voat is considered to be a hate site:
http://gizmodo.com/goodbye-and-good-riddance-to-voat-reddits-gross-clone-1795337099
The_Duke_of_Dabs ago
Heretic!
hats_ ago
Sure is.
Ask, share and learn about growin' shit on v/justgrowit for instance.
Or make fun of poor life choices at v/FUCKYOUDAD - bonus for capturing one in the wild and sharing.
Or, hell, looking over cool old maps at v/mapporn
Or even share, discuss and listen to audiobooks on v/audiobooksonyoutube
I donno. There's some cool - and very, very dead (poor v/moviesuggestions ...and roller rinks.) - things out there that we can somewhat agree on if we look. Or, reading someone's stories or suggestions is cool, too. The brain needs to refresh from headbutting too much, me thinks.
MinorLeakage ago
Well /v/mapporn may be the home I never knew existed. Did someone literally make this subverse just for me? Thanks for sharing!
GrandpaPepe ago
If he's actually not a SB shill, eventually overtime he will be redpilled. There will be built up cognitive dissonance to think his side actually has any arguments.
srgmpdns ago
He's tan, rested and ready after his 9-day summer vacation!
Bets he'll break the record by the middle of the week?
NeedleStack ago
Here it is on Wednesday and he broke the record, just like you said!
Owlchemy ago
There should be a threshold for down votes. Once you reach so many, your account should be automatically disabled, period. They can always make another, but that would at least make these shills work for a living - LOL
NeedleStack ago
John did it! He beat @She!
junesunflower ago
Oh yea... we believe in free speech as long as its speech we agree with. Right?
Stupid as fuck voat mentality.
hafen ago
I could think of far too many ways that that's possible to abuse and be turned against us. Pizzagaters were downvoted en masse by stealth accounts once, and it could become a legit tactic for censorship. It's also a complete waste of voat's available usernames. Let them comment, however maybe apply some lighter penalties. (like I belive they already have)
facevalue ago
I am vehemently against deleting thr accounts of those whose opinions we strongly disagree with. That would be one small step for policy and one giant leap toward reddit. As I understand things, the pioneers in the first exodus that became Voat could have simply created new accounts and continued to post themselves. That's a real slippery slope.
Chiefpacman ago
Yeah if we disagree with people they shouldn't be able to post! Dissent offends me
/s
surprisecockfag ago
That's not why this guy is getting downvoated and you know it.
Chiefpacman ago
Uhh yeah, why do you think he's being downvoated? Obviously people don't agree with him.
and you know it
I'll go ahead and assume that you think he is a shill. Even if that were true, you don't get to decide who does and doesn't get to post on this website. Aka, having your say.
But I'll go ahead and let you know, that account is a fucking joke. An annoying one, but it's still active because people freak out about him and we have posts like this showing up on the front page every week. He's a troll, he has the right to be here, and you're feeding him.
surprisecockfag ago
"he's a troll, he has the right to be here, and you're feeding him." sounds a lot like "if you kill your enemies, they win."
Chiefpacman ago
You don't kill your enemy by banning there account.
Were you not on Reddit before this? Because like half of us have been banned from there. Do we look dead?
BookyMonstur ago
I don't think you're going to convince this guy that his other account should be banned.
DependasaurusRex ago
On this one, I think he is meaning that once they hit, say, -2k ccp (i would put it at 1k), that the account is a troll and it is essentially useless. Not for dessenting proposes, but to keep those trying to make a negative record for shits and giggles. Just my two cents though.
Chiefpacman ago
So he could just make another account anyways. So it wouldn't do anything...
Can't you just ban him? Why haven't all of you done that yet..
Chiefpacman ago
Are you aware that we have downvoating brigades here? Oncd a guy gets blacklisted by some users, it's an ongoing battle.
Dont infringe on our principles because of a troll. Have your say, not have your say if it follows guidelines.
Slippery slope.
DependasaurusRex ago
Yeah, dont get me wrong. I definitely see where you are going with it, and sure, I dont like those that dv just because they dont like someone, but at some point, if the person goes that far with random shenanigans, i can see it being a fruitless endeavour. Honestely, if you manage to make ti to -1k, you have to be trying. Not slippery sloping it on this one, and i do believe it exists.
Chiefpacman ago
Would you say that he single-handedly hurts your voating experience?
Then ban him. Yourself. Don't ask for him to be censored from others.
DependasaurusRex ago
I am not the one dving, by the by, and could honestly care less over all. The only reason I threw up the idea was because of trolling competitions, but it really doesnt affect me at all. I am fine either way no matter how it plays out. I generally enjoy flipping through the dv'd posts, but can see where the negative competitions can encourage many to just be a bit annoying. Again, doesnt bither me one way or the other. Just a suggestion.
Chiefpacman ago
I know youre not downvoating me.
There's some dumbass new account who's following me around today.
Probably an alt of the shill we have been discussing here. Which makes you think, this post is nothing but feeding him attention.
I just genuinely think anyone should be able to post here. Even if thet hate us and mean to destroy us.
Though, I do think he is nothing more than an attention seeker. Not a paid shill.
DependasaurusRex ago
Yeah, probably. I rarely dv, and only to those pulling shit off topic. This whole post really is a bit of a non issue in the grand scheme of things.
I do agree though. Everyone should have the ability to post. It is just the "trolling for no other reason than the lols" thing that I could care less about, but again, it really doesnt bother me one way or another. They can keep up doing their thing, but wont bother me much.
<3 you nonetheless though, man. Keep on keeping on.
Chiefpacman ago
Thanks.
Back At you.
DependasaurusRex ago
I love this place for these types of conversations and hate when you get the ideologs in the middle that try to turn every slight disagreement into a war. It is nice to have a constructive plave to say what you like with someone you disagree with and still like eachother at the end of the day.
Sorry for the rant, but it is refreshing, unlike shit happenening on the IRL server. I really do appreciate what you do man.
stayawayfrommybutt ago
Yes I gotta agree with these guys. There is a big difference between someone who has a general unpopular opinion, but still contributing value to the discussions.. Versus someone with literally thousands of negative votes. Idk the best way to do it or if anything should be done at all.. Just pointing out the difference in a troll that is tarnishing a discussion/thread and a left wing liberal posting thoughtful disagreement.
Owlchemy ago
Hell, I never cared if someone dissents. Everyone's opinion has value. That's called free speech. I may not agree with you, but I don't down vote for that or let it bother me. I simply don't up vote ya ... that's my way of saying I disagree. But hey, if someone has thousands of down votes from others, that's above and beyond and dips into the realm of a spammer or troll, not someone voicing a legitimate argument for a position. No one accumulates that bad a reputation because they simply disagree. At least that's my thought.
Chiefpacman ago
You are suggested we implement a ban on unpopular users.
Idk if that was a joke, but no thanks. There are sites where that practice is implemented, hence my being on voat.
Owlchemy ago
I suggested that spammers should need to work to irritate us ... nothing more. My suggestion won't be implemented, you and I both know that ... sorry I ruffled your feathers, but if someone is being paid to flood Voat with nonsense ... spam us, what I said has merit in my mind ... however, I also know Voat well enough that that won't happen. BTW, to insinuate that I'm somehow anti-free speech or not a staunch supporter of Voat values due to an off the cuff remark is irritating in it's own right.
Chiefpacman ago
I just think that this website is great because you can say whatever the fuck you want. It doesn't matter what you think or what I think or what he thinks, we can all say it.
I think that what you're suggesting is detrimental to that. I don't think that it's even really the first step in the wrong direction though.
Can't you just ban him? If he so awful, couldn't everyone who doesn't like him just banned him. I think a lot of people actually do enjoy his presence, gives them a false sense of importance.
I think he is a joke, a troll who loves the reaction he is getting. It's just so obvious. Have you seen the guys posts? Seems pretty fake
Owlchemy ago
Don't know why someone down voted ya - LOL - but will balance that out. Yeah, probably a troll. Have a great Sunday, I've been screwin' off and haven't been here much today.
Chiefpacman ago
You're good.
Some small cabal has been on my ass since I made that comment.
Furthers my suspicion that this guy is a troll. It doesn't really matter.
Its all about principle. I know you didn't mean any harm by your comment, my sarcastic response was kind of dickish.
You and I wonder around the same parts of the voat, so I should play nicer.
Enjoy your Sunday as well, thank you
Owlchemy ago
No biggie ... like I just made an off the cuff remark and a bunch of users I never heard of were jumpin' all over me (not you, we're regulars - LOL) ... so I got a tad defensive. Too late in the evening, I suppose when that went down. We're cool - LOL
BookyMonstur ago
Yeah that guy wasn't disagreeing with you. He just flipped what you said in a condescending manner. That's not a dialogue.
Chiefpacman ago
Yeah ignore that guy's point.
Maybe we should also implement a ban on 25 day old day accounts from commenting too while were at it. Couldn't hurt ;)
BookyMonstur ago
So you think a discussion has value when a naysayer disagrees with someone just for the joy of it? How much are you getting paid for having seniority?
Chiefpacman ago
Just FYI, when you go through my comment list and downvoat everything, it goes away in like an hour.
really you're just putting in effort for nothing. It's flattering, but I assure you it's not necessary
BookyMonstur ago
Just FYI get a life and go fuck yourself John!
Chiefpacman ago
I feel bad for you.
Have fun with your made-up realization
BookyMonstur ago
I feel bad for you. Must hurt having to eat bags of dicks all day. Gotta make that money tho.
Chiefpacman ago
There it is, now I'm a shill for standing up for someone and having an old account. Lol.
25 day accounts smell bad this week.
BookyMonstur ago
I didn't realize you were defending your own alternate account. It makes sense now. And omg I'm new here! The shame! How will I live with this scarlet letter upon my breast!?! You stink because you are a nigger faggot and not the good kind.
Chiefpacman ago
English isn't your first language is it...
Not going to waste words on you anymore. Youre not going to do well here kiddo
BookyMonstur ago
What are you writing a book? Get off my nuts. Everything you say is a waste. You think trolls have a legitimate right to reverse arguments, but you turn all pissy when someone fucks with you? Fuck off.
stayawayfrommybutt ago
I agree everyone should have a right to speak.. Even if they have a mental illness. However isn't there something a little "off" about a paid shill who dedicates their time here to troll instead of being useful and contributing valuable content/conversation? The getting paid part is especially what makes things a little different.
Chiefpacman ago
Slippery slope.
Who should we put in charge of choosing who is a shill or not?
When you've been here longer than a month, you get accused of being a shill from time to time.
IMO even the trolls should be allowed to post here. Have your say?
NeedleStack ago
I admire his sticktoitiveness.
Go, John, Go!!
Owlchemy ago
LOL - you do gotta give him that. Funny you should mention him though. I got a comment from him an hour ago or so for mentioning to someone who was concerned his ilk were spamming Voat. I gave whoever the advise to reportspammers and let them sort it out, if they thought it was legit spam ... he was unhappy with my advice - LOL. He's a vocal dude for sure. But hasn't responded back when I explained I just advised. f ya don't like it, complain to anyone who actually does report ya. I just provided them an avenue to vent. BTW ... do those guys get paid to shill? Just curious, I generally ignore their nonsensical BS.
NeedleStack ago
Yes, they get paid to shill:
https://medium.com/@getongab/the-far-left-works-with-silicon-valley-to-fight-populism-with-paid-shills-and-censorship-ff94f93d2ba3
RandomGoater ago
I kind of want to sign up. Like do an account, that everyone knows is a shill, and just post random bullshit. And get paid to voat. On one hand, it could be useful just to know what their agenda is. And I wouldn't feel bad because everyone knows it's a shill account.
NeedleStack ago
You'd probably be obligated to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement that would prevent you from letting others know you are a shill account. And if you violated the terms you could get sued/fined and lose since you signed the NDA.
RandomGoater ago
It'd still be fun.
Owlchemy ago
Interesting, thanks. Leftist are the most humorless, obnoxious folk around. It's always a pleasure for me when I do engage them, to know that I've left them steaming - LOL> But more times than not, it isn't worth the bother ... it's more fun messing with the heads of trolls most days.