pizzagate and the loli community don't get along well and most of that is pizzagate users getting pissed at the loli community that was here much longer. hecho used to be the batman of voat, people would troll him, he would troll back. i have always stood for free speech, meaning that i support both of those communities. but lets face some facts, the amount of harassment and open threats i have received has dramatically increased since pizzagate came to voat. i believe they have a right to free speech, but i also have a right to free speech.

can't take a little pedo promotion? than why the fuck are you on a site for free speech? think that down votes aren't a form of censorship? than eat some down votes. turn about is fair play.

also beatlejuice has trolled the shit out of me as well. he just likes to cause trouble and provoke a reaction. he stopped trolling me after a bit when i defended his right to troll me as part of defense for free speech.

desperately trying to prevent any voat users from communicating off site

That's a nice inflammation of a point, injecting emotive assumptions as a means of persuading the reader.

Traditionally, when wanting to disrupt and online forum, groups, agencies and organizations have relied on the tactic of creating an offsite communications channel where 'divide and conquer' can be enacted by creating drama between participants in the community.

Personally, I'm against using offsite tools to discuss issues about the site, or members of the site. I would also not stop or hinder anyone wanting to do that, it simply taints them as possible subversives or a potential useful idiot of the disruptors.
I can't figure out what the agenda for SBBH is, beyond being asshats, but I would also never advocate the removal of it's community members ability to speak freely - no matter how annoying some may find it.

This post itself is something that makes me suspicious because it's promoting drama and singling out individuals, which in turn directs the energy of the community to infighting instead of the topics relevant to individual subverses (subversi?).
Promoting infighting is one of the least effort tools disruptions have in the tool set they use when wanting to dismantle structures that permit communication that can't be otherwise controlled or curtailed.
Identifying what the core problems with the mechanics of how the site works and proposing changes is something that can be done to avoid the creation of drama while producing meaningful results.

Cancer mod of Pizzagate sub

As a moderator of that sub I take all claims of corruption very seriously.
I see statements like thin being made all over the site, but whenever I ask for links to proof, or anything to support the claim I either get silence or walls of crazy text that are only useful as a replacement for lorem ipsum.
If you have real, unambiguous evidence that there is a cancer mod in the subverse feel free to privately or publicly message me so I can assess it and take action if necessary.

autistic transexual

What is the actual problem with this?

is a conflict of interests for the majority of Voat users

How is it the first, and why do you presume to speak for the community in the second?

Attacks on personal character just invalidate your claims, unless you can re-enforce the assertion with facts?

The discord was pretty cool. Sometimes i miss it. I really miss the voatchat with no log though. That was sweet.