Just a question while I'm here. What would you mods do with the above linked featured video if it was posted to your sub under the current rules. This guy has a sub here on Voat so he's even following the guidelines for spam in the FAQ but my question is what would you do if he started posting these to your sub.
Well his reviews are "reviews for cash" if you look at more than that one video andor his sub but I purposely only showed you one. For what it's worth we have a similar policy at v/sports, although that one would be deleted most likely. Someone mentioned earlier to you I think how you would react to a janitor coming in to clean spam as advised by the admins. What would your reaction be if they were to delete maybe all of evrocot's videos under their direction?
The community discussed evercott specifically and said voats should decided.
If someone showed up, said to hell with community wishes, and did what they wanted instead, that would not be cool.
Well thats just hypothetical but something that could happen. Personally I wouldn't begrudge them since they have it in their FAQ and own the site. Anyway time for me to log off.
view the rest of the comments →
InnocentBystander ago
@THC @Violentlight
I should have pinged you guys to this post
I'm bad with pings, sorry.
I thought one post in PV without lies in the title might be a good idea since it looks like AOU is going to keep going.
Disappointed ago
https://www.youtube.com/allbestlist
Just a question while I'm here. What would you mods do with the above linked featured video if it was posted to your sub under the current rules. This guy has a sub here on Voat so he's even following the guidelines for spam in the FAQ but my question is what would you do if he started posting these to your sub.
InnocentBystander ago
I'm on my phone, so I didn't look much into the account, but assuming it is reviews, and not advertising, it would stay under the current rule.
That is not because we decided it. It is because that's how the community told us to.
AOU ago
Yet another "community" card.
When you sign up, you agree with voat rules.
What you mods here are doing is banning people who enforce them and tell others they don't have to follow them.
And worst, you even want to supersede these rules with yours on the sidebar, in a default sub.
No wonder why your sub is filled with spammers and their spambots.
@Atko @Puttitout Are you ok with mods superseding voat rules about spam?
From the User Agreement:
From the FAQ:
InnocentBystander ago
That has been the case for over a year. Atko knows, and yet we're still his "favourite" sub.
Suck on that troll.
AOU ago
Suck on what?
Show me the evidence @Atko is ok with you changing voat's default rules about spam.
Disappointed ago
Well his reviews are "reviews for cash" if you look at more than that one video andor his sub but I purposely only showed you one. For what it's worth we have a similar policy at v/sports, although that one would be deleted most likely. Someone mentioned earlier to you I think how you would react to a janitor coming in to clean spam as advised by the admins. What would your reaction be if they were to delete maybe all of evrocot's videos under their direction?
InnocentBystander ago
I'd be upset.
The community discussed evercott specifically and said voats should decided.
If someone showed up, said to hell with community wishes, and did what they wanted instead, that would not be cool.
Disappointed ago
Well thats just hypothetical but something that could happen. Personally I wouldn't begrudge them since they have it in their FAQ and own the site. Anyway time for me to log off.