@THC was removed as moderator from v/videos for the following reasons:
-
Used a @system subverse as a personal platform
-
Defacing the subverse CSS
@InnocentBystander was removed as designer on v/videos for maliciously modifying the subverse CSS in response to @THC's removal.
We decided to leave the sticky up since @THC felt so strongly about this that he would consider using a @system sub as a soapbox an acceptable course of action.
@Cynabuns doesn't have the power or authority to remove moderators and neither did she request either of you to be removed.
Bottom line is you thought v/videos was your personal subverse to do with as you please. You had issues with Voat asking for Janitors on @system subs and had issues when admins stepped in due to poor handling in the past.
You forced us to remove you and I'm more confident than not that this is the outcome you desired and why you did what you did.
On the paging limitation for those interested:
https://voat.co/v/voatdev/1389285/6738688/10
view the rest of the comments →
HitlerIsBlack ago
Why were people instigating a witchhunt against the admins? The comment history issues was a trivial problem and the admins explained why they did it. Could the users complaining about it be the same people who were abusing it to take down voat's servers? The admins even explained it was only temporary, until the servers are upgraded.
fagnig ago
If you mean the same people who are modding system subverses, i think youre taking it a little too far, but if its truly temporary i personally dont see the drama, even the banner was really small, this whole episode seems very avoidable.
Chiefpacman ago
Calling THC a shill is stupid. Maybe he handled it wrong, but his intentions were clearly anti-censorship; as they have always been from what I've seen.