Let me give you a little background:
When I first came here to Voat it was because of the PIZZAGATE scandal. Most of the conspiracies I read about in the past 5 years or so got me to find God again. I am a Christian. To me there is only one Book - The Bible (KJV version) that describes exactly the truth of what happens in this world. I understood that the synagogue of Satan and the principalities in high places of this world ruled it from the shadows. Though names like the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers are quite commonly related with the principalities, that want to have the synagogue take over on a One World Government, ruled by the Sodomite jew in the letter of perdition, nobody knows for sure who and how many are behind those shadows.
To me Jesus is the only Truth, the only Way. And though many of you may disagree with me that is the main reason why I do not trust or put my faith in one man/woman. For the things of man are not of God. That is why I am quite skeptic about this whole Q thing. As interesting as it may be for me to read about it, I still find it shady.
That being said, here on Voat I had the chance to understand the Word of God better as thanks to @Crensch, on a previous interaction we had, I was able to finally make the difference between the "jews in the letter" and "Jews in the Spirit" (Romans 2:28 - 29) and also why the Synagogue of Satan had that particular name. @Crensch is not a believer (and probably will never be, but I have faith in God that he may come around for I wish him well), but we both have something in common: We both distrust the Synagogue of Satan to our core. He will call them KIKES or (((THEM))). And so will most of Voat's community. We all believe that the word "antisemitism" is a word created by the jews in the letter (the term I use - but I admit I use the others as well ;) ) to use the guilt, race and victim cards on all of us gentiles - known by them as GOYIM. This is an example of why WE do not give words that much importance, because though they can be use to hurt feelings. those same words can also strengthen character so we can stand firm against them or against those that use them to manipulate people.
The synagogue of Satan means the church of the adversary. The ones who oppose the Word of God given through Jesus Christ. They use the old testament at convenience to manipulate others and they pervert the Word of God with their paganism and witchcraft. That is why I am a proud Voater. Though many here, if not most, wish to have the jews in the letter and their stooges "gassed" I can only offer them the Word of God. God in the end will be their judge.
You may wonder what is the point of me telling you all this. I will get there don't worry. I am not trying to evangelize you. I am just giving you my perspective of things. And here it goes:
We may all have our differences but as a community we all get to learn from each other. I while being here my faith has gotten stronger for I see in many that outcast Christians the hands of the enemy that inspire them to act against us. As a Christian I know that many will call themselves like that, but are not. So I understand that dealing with shills is an everyday task. Call them out, ignore them is what we can do. But I will never be part of censorship for that is what the synagogue wants: censorship is their tool to police the goyims thoughts. I am done with all that.
I understood that as some may not agree with me, we can still find common ground to work together and not wish ill for each other. That is what I gained from Voat and I want to share it with you. I know that right now there is a great division between two subs here: v/theawakening and v/GreatAwakening. At some point, you guys will have to find that common ground (even though it is quite obvious) the mods on v/theawakening are letting their personal believes/feelings trump their rational thinking. You need to understand that YES you will have to deal with shills and that some may very well work against you. But if you do not find that common ground to work together with v/GreatAwakening then all your work will go down the drain. I am not here to divide, I am here to let you know that I will not stand by censorship but I will support justifiable, documented and public accusation of the shill user accounts.
@Crensch has quite the experience in doing that and he is a great tool you guys can serve yourselves with to handle that. I trust him firmly for I know that God used him in two different occasions to share truth about Christians even when he didn't realized he did. Any one that stands by him, knows that he is well intended. Plus I find his aggressive and epic argumentations with some foul language quite amusing to read and enlightening. If he stands by v/GreatAwakening I know he means well for your community to flourish.
I am not putting faith on a man when you have proofs of what he has already done. I am putting trust that he is transparent and is like a pitbull when he needs to defend his friends and his family. In this case the family I am talking about is both Voat and the members of the v/GreatAwakening.
He has in the past also defended Q with great resolve against Q skeptics that tend to troll the v/GreatAwakening even when that meant that he had to publicly denounce someone that he knew before for his continuous defamation of the movement without proofs.
If he has trust in the user list that the v/GreatAwakening had given to you fellows then I will not doubt that he has good reasons for that. But he also is a person that will not let the movement go stray for someone he knows as he proved that before. And I have no doubt that the other users he has pinged in past posts have also good things to offer: @Trigglypuff, @Rotteuxx, @ExpertShitposter, @Hand_of_Node and specially @srayzie and @Shizy.
Again I am not going to put my faith in a man like Q, but I do find the topic interesting. My faith goes to Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit.
May God bless you all and bring you peace so you can stand against the synagogue of Satan - UNITED.
view the rest of the comments →
ExpertShitposter ago
Pizzagate deletes spam and bans repeat offenders. People have mostly accepted that. So you wouldn't have caught nearly as much flak if that's all you did.
What you did however, was wrote a set of rules where "hate speech" is a banable offense, even if its q related. Not only is that retarded to begin with (because niggers and jews really do suck), but you also then have to have a few mods that will have to decide what is hate speech and what isn't.
So then you have the same situation as when the government wants to ban hate speech, and a handful of judges will define what hate speech it. And wallah, Q and pizzagate discussion is "harassment of Innocent congressmen and government officials" and must be a jail worthy offense.
See how that works? If you ever make something illegal, then someone has to be in a position of power to define what that is. And that person is always a jew fucking faggot, and then shit gets fucked.
You were gonna get trolled ether way, because that's life on the internet, but you got flooded with shit because you revealed your self to be the same kind of redditor, as the ones who banned you over there.
Bludgie ago
What sucks is stupid generalisations about a whole group of people. Even though I think you racists are hideous morons, for instance, I still will usually look at you as an individual.
Crackrocknigga ago
You're a racist too. We are all racists. Some are just more comfortable in expressing their subconscious being and reaching a place of equilibrium away from cognitive dissonance.
Bludgie ago
I'm bigoted for sure, cause I hate you arrogant racist fuckers for sure. I hate you whatever your skin colour. A lot.
Fenrir-1488 ago
Your descendants will live in fear, surrounded by poc that hate them for shit they never did. Outnumbered in a country that you people gave away because you were too stupid to call a spade a spade.
Bludgie ago
Hate them for shit they never did? That sounds like you racists to me.
Fenrir-1488 ago
I don’t hate anyone that hasn’t given me a reason to. Hatred isn’t my motivation at all.
Bludgie ago
Well, I do. And I don't like it. I don't want to feel that way. I've never been near a weapon in my life, except maybe when I was chopping potatoes. I agonize over all the people executed who were really innocent. All that shit. But I feel completely consumed by hate when I see someone judged, not on their character, but by the color of their skin. Or however that thing goes. I hate being judged by the color of my skin as much. It's the most ridiculous bullshit.
Fenrir-1488 ago
For sure, I hate injustice as much as anyone, I don’t like to see anyone suffer for any reason. I don’t like that it has to be this way. I would like to live in the multicultural paradise where everyone equal and gets along fine as much as you would. It’s not possible though. That’s not reality, it’s pure fantasy.
Still, I’m not saying you shouldn’t judge individuals on an individual basis, but it’s also not unreasonable to judge a group as a group.
Race is much more than skin color. The fact of the matter is that our children would be a hell of a lot safer and happier if this country was all white, I have all the stats and studies, you can’t beat me on that. We’re also going to see the U.S. dip below 50% white for the first time in its history at some point between 2035 and 2045. This will lead to massive Balkanization and the eventual collapse of the U.S. and in this lawless war zone that’s created, it will be our children that become everyone’s favorite targets (see: South Africa and ). But at least when when they’re being murdered left and right (already happening really) you can be prideful because you stuck to your guns and were just too good of a person to be a little racist.
Bludgie ago
I'm not prideful. The fact is our white children are being endangered by racism like their black children are. So how about just fight against racism, which is the ACTUAL problem?
Fenrir-1488 ago
You’re fantasizing again. You’d be sacrificing our future for a fucking fairytale.
Whites are the only people who have ever put not being racist ahead of our collective interests. The other races don’t give a fuck about racism except when they can use it as a weapon against us. They’re not going to adopt white western values just because people like you think it would be the right thing for them to do.
Bludgie ago
I don't care about the ropes. The fact that you can meet a black person and instantly assume you're somehow less violent, smarter or superior in any other way--just based on race--is self-evidently stupid. And a person must feel pretty inferior to care so much about him, and others that LOOK like him, being "superior." There is just nothing about a supremacist ideology I respect. You could beat me bloody on your "ropes" and I'd still see you and your ideology the same way.
Fenrir-1488 ago
Complete straw man, you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. I’m not a supremacist first of all, my beliefs would be completely identical if I thought we inferior to everyone else in every way.
Secondly, I don’t meet a black person and assume anything about their intelligence or violent tendencies until they demonstrate either.
I do however know for a fact (the stats don’t lie) that if you get a group of 100 random black people and 100 random white people, the white people will be about 30% as violent and have an average IQ around 15 points higher (in the U.S. (the gap is wider elsewhere)).
I’ll reiterate that race is more than skin color or looks. The science is with me on this.
Bludgie ago
Still laughing at "stats don't lie." I appreciate your other points, though.
Fenrir-1488 ago
So you don’t have an argument?
Bludgie ago
Where do the statistics begin? Like, 100 years ago, were black people in this country more violent?
Fenrir-1488 ago
I haven’t seen any that go back more than 50 years. Detailed crime statistics would likely be hard to find as you move away from the existence of computers.
My guess would be that it was a bit in lower in general since they wouldn’t have had as many issues with gangs at the time. Most of their communities would’ve also been a lot smaller and more closely knit.
Anecdotally, I know that Harlem NY wouldn’t have been considered a very safe place to be 100 years ago.
Bludgie ago
Crime also depends on how you label it. Murders of people don't tend to be counted when others consider them less than human, or deserving of less rights.
Fenrir-1488 ago
Are you suggesting we’re just ignoring white people’s crimes these days?
Bludgie ago
Nope.
Bludgie ago
I am happy to take you at your word about your position. As far as taking your word about "the science," no. Even if it is an accepted theory at the time, it probably won't be in 20 years. Mostly, it doesn't accord with my experiences of people. I didn't even think about being white till I came to America. The place is obsessed with it. Also, you act like IQ tests should be taken seriously. If I used my results as evidence of intelligence I'd be laughed off this site even more than I already am.
Fenrir-1488 ago
We’re obsessed with it because we were the first victims of this failed multiculturalism experiment. Outside of the Balkans, Europeans would not have had nearly as much exposure to other races until somewhat recently.
I’ll grant that IQ can be somewhat flawed when it comes to individuals but it works well for groups. For example there is a strong correlation with IQ and how successful people are, but there will be outliers. Criminality also correlates with it, spiking around 85 points.
I don’t even know how you could argue that race is only skin deep. It’s not a coincidence that strong man competitions are dominated by white people while sprinting competitions are dominated by black people. We know this is because the ratio of fast twitch to slow twitch muscle fibers vary across racial lines. We also know that black people have denser bones or that Most East Asians have a gene that works to prevent fat from accumulating and another one. We also know that intelligence is somewhere between 50-90% genetic depending on which study you want to use. We know that race is essentially a pool of commonly shared genes within a group.
Bludgie ago
That's not what I've seen. I've read that people can have more in common genetically with a person of another race than with someone else of their own. I'm sure the issue of whether race even exists is highly disputed rather than settled science. So what "race" is a "biracial" person?
Fenrir-1488 ago
I could see how it would technically be possible but it would be incredibly rare.
What breed is a half husky-half lab? Clearly dog breeds must not exist if it’s possible for the line to get blurry.
Bludgie ago
Those aren't "races."
Fenrir-1488 ago
There isn’t much of a difference in terms of biology. The difference is the one between natural and artificial selection. Pugs and wolves are more than 99.9% genetically identical.
Bludgie ago
I don't know of any "race" that has been artificially selected.
Fenrir-1488 ago
Well no. I didn’t say they were. Abstractions and pedantry about words like race, breed, and even species are unimportant and arbitrary. Again, in biological terms, there isn’t much of a difference.
For there to be no significant differences, evolution would have to have paused almost completely for everything but skin color for 40,000-50,000 years while different populations lived in radically different environments under radically different climate conditions (ice age).
While ‘normal’, your stance seems completely absurd from the outside.