carnold03 ago

...in that it also means that anyone with neanderthal DNA genetically has higher inclination to race mix.

yiddlerontheroof ago

...as opposed to blacks who will literally fuck anything that moves? give me a break

carnold03 ago

As opposed to blacks, who will literally fornicate with anything that moves? Give me a break.

ftfy

gungasnake ago

Yuppyism poisons science. There is a company named 23andme which has been operating a scam in which, for a fee, ignorant yuppies have been sending in dna swabs and receiving computer readouts indicating their percentage of supposed Neanderthal ancestry, as in"

WHOA!!!!! I'M 3.5373221 PERCENT NEANDERTHAL!!! I'M MAJOR-LEAGUE BAD, Y'ALL BETTER WATCH OUT FOR ME!!!!"

Again, all of that is a bunch of bullshit and public school science; we are related to hominids only via similar design. The good news is that 23andme appears to be going under and has laid off 100 people, as has been reported on CNBC recently.

gungasnake ago

Author Troy McLachlan describes the darkish condition of our present planet some tens of thousands of years ago in his "Saturn Death Cult" and the related website:

saturndeathcult dot com

The oldest human oral traditions describe that age as a "Purple Dawn". The old creatures of our world, leftover from that age (Lemurs, tarsiers, owls, bush-babies...) all have the same kind of huge, dark-world eyes which you'd need for that environment; remains of hominids such as the Neanderthal and dinosaurs also show the huge eye sockets associated with such eyes. Humans on the other hand with our relatively tiny eyes could not have arisen in such an environment. All available evidence says that the first humans to walk our earth arrived here suddenly with all of their fancy tools, weapons, and artwork in place from day one.

That is not consistent with any sort of an idea of humans evolving from hominids; it IS consistent with the idea of humans coming here via some haphazard process from somewhere else in our system.

We are related to the Neanderthal and other hominids only via similar design; we are not descended from hominids and we have never interbred with hominids, all of that is a bunch of BS and public school science.

The Neanderthal was a very advanced bipedal ape with huge dark world eyes and DNA which was closer to that of a chimpanzee than to ours. Google image search on "vendramini neanderthal" for details.

Check out cosmosincollision dot com for a real version of human origins, at least within our own system. To my knowledge, nobody has any sort of a theory as to where the first humans in the universe at large originated.

Check also the Ganymede Hypothesis group on Facebook.

gungasnake ago

For an idea as to what Neanderthals actually looked like, do a google image search on "vendramini neanderthal". The public school version of that sort of thing is totally wrong.

gungasnake ago

Horses and donkeys are very much closer one to the other than humans ever were to Neanderthals or other hominids, and all mules are sterile. Humans could no more interbreed with Neanderthals than we could with snakes or horses.

gungasnake ago

Genetic studies aren't exactly a soft subject but universities appear to be handing out PHD degrees in those subjects without any requirement for a course in basic logic these days. Svante Paabo and others at Max Planck are making a giant logical error in assuming that Neanderthal genes in humans imply past interbreeding.

We share 60% of our DNA with the banana. That does not imply crossbreeding between humans and banana trees; it probably comes from humans EATING banans pretty much forever.

The situation with Neanderthals is similar, The first experience modern humans ever had with Neanderthals was watching friends and family members being killed and eaten by Neanderthals. Occasionally eating a Neanderthal which had been killed in battle was just sending the Neanderthals a message in their own language. Africans lacking such genes means that Neanderthals were never on the menu in Africa.

Check out the "Neanderthal Realities" group on facebook...

rebel_1812 ago

We need dieases to that target only niggers. Its necessary to protect civilization.

TheSeer ago

Erectus died out? Wrong. Erectus walks amongst us.

goatmensch ago

Blacks also lack prefrontal cortexes.

veteran88 ago

Not the same species.

Fuck these kikes and their lies about race.

Look at the protocols of the elders of Zion. They are doing it on purpose.

Holonomic ago

Apparently 'oaf', in this thread, is plagiarizing or spamming those walls of text.

[d]eddit

McPooperton ago

Does that make the information incorrect?

oaf ago

"plagiarizing?" LIAR! BACKWARD!

@Holonomic is 100% backward wrong!

@Holonomic erroneously located someone borrowing my own 100% created words and reddit user/Infearmal , whom is VERY similar in mental spirit to me, pasted it on Reddit and user/Infearmal said SPECIFICALLY in the top that user/Infearmal DID NOT AUTHOR it but rather I did. Read this line from user/Infearmal :

Ok pal. I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet commenting about this meme. Thanksfully someone has found your whinny hideout and linked to this page. We're not even talking about being subhumans anymore.

That user on reddit copying my works wrote :

"I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet"

That "someone else" is me, from NOT on reddit. @Holonomic cannot read a whole post.

I have no active reddit account, and only posted 4 times in my past before being banned there for posting statistics on Black welfare in the USA from the Government statistics. I am NOT user/Infearmal.

@Holonomic is trying to be a jew shill because one of his parents is a Negro and being half black or quarter Black, @Holonomic DOES NOT like reading DNA FACTS about Negroes being a provable different SPECIES not SUBSPECIES.

I thought I had to respond. But I am very very happy to see a red pill of mine pasted nearly verbatim onto reddit! I am smiling so much this hour from spotting it on reddit in user comments even if an admin probably deleted it or hid it.

@McPooperton, the repaster on reddit specifically typed this phrase that caucasians can read and comprehend : "I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet", and thus @Holonomic is spreading Jew lie disenchantment and narrative shifting and "attacking the messenger not the message".

TL/DR : All my writings are 100% correct and my own, and @Holonomic is hilariously incorrect, becase my works did not originate on reddit.

Holonomic ago

Quit spamming me you fucking asshole.

You plagiarize your shit, or copy it and when you get called out you flip your bean like a deranged faggot.

NotHereForPizza ago

Blacks are the only native human species.

yiddlerontheroof ago

The article points to the fact that blacks interbred with non-human hominids that non-Africans never encountered.

NotHereForPizza ago

Pretty much.

i_hate_sodomites ago

Niggers are niggers; they're degenerate half-animals that should've been wiped out 50,000 years ago, like all the half-animals before them. Unfortunately, we got "gifted" with the empathy genes from Neanderthals, and now we're all going to die....

aWe5it5 ago

Not killing niggers off seems to be the first time such a thing happened. Making us one of the inventors of peace. Obviously a mistake since we now have to deal with this shit.

oaf ago

So sadly, glaringly obvious and true. Altruism "empathy gene" rs53576 OXTR , and 8 other genes, dooms white civilization from white female voters having over-empathy. https://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs53576

spaceman84 ago

Bantus raped other nig varieties out of existence lol what a surprise

outrider787 ago

Absolutely

Blood-is-Nature ago

Is this where we talk about the Rh blood type of the Rhesus macaque?

DrPhate ago

Niggers are monsters.

smokratez ago

Neanderthals were the smart ones.

Gargilius ago

Neanderthals were the smart ones

Yet, their dumb open border immigration policies killed them off...

GreenSlug ago

Its that pathological altruism we still struggle with

oaf ago

pathological altruism

Caused by "Winter planning" and also aiding genetic relatives during cold climates (also known as empathy, but actually is DNA related biological altruism.

This empathy can be mapped and loosely correlates with large prefrontal cortex found mainly in caucasians of NORTHERN europe, and countries they emigrated to : USA, Canada, Australia. Non-biased massive empathy studies using "scientific plagiarism" as the corruption metric correlates with forehead height, based on millions of science papers studied by AI for plagiarism.

But this pathological altruism forced higher empathy females to INVITE INVADERS of other DNA pools into their tribal lands!

Nordic Females INVITE darker skinned invaders in! Too much empathy.

pathological altruism is a real thing

Thousands of papers exist on biological altruism, though most are in colony insects, like ants. Biological altruism only works if not too often invaded by those that cuckold the empathetic.

Too little empathy results on CRIME AND CORRUPTION: middle east corruption, Indian subcontinent corruption, Asian corruption, South America corruption, etc.

EMPATHY is not merely a forehead volume, it is a set of GENES that now can be studied and have been.

rs53576 OXTR Oxytocin love receptor gene is defective in most asians and causes extreme lack of empathy

https://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs53576

rs53576 has a defect of a G to A change that shows up in hundreds of DNA empathy studies, chinese and koreans have a defect.

Many other genes in asians also contribute to lack of empathy. Note : not all gene differences are related to oxytocin, endorphins, and vasopressin differences. Many different genes affect empathy.

Chinese Cultural Lack of Empathy in Development : Professor Stephen Myler Phd

https://ezinearticles.com/?Chinese-Cultural-Lack-of-Empathy-in-Development---Counselling-Practice&id=1907719

https://www.academia.edu/3620724/Chinese_Lack_Of_Empathy_In_Development

How can I be proud of my China if we are a nation of 1.4bn cold hearts? - Lijia Zhang:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/oct/22/china-nation-cold-hearts

The Unbearable Coldness of Being Chinese :

https://chublicopinion.com/2015/12/06/the-unbearable-coldness-of-being-chinese/

I mention all the above to point out that higher IQ in asians, and higher IQ in some flavors of Jews, does not correlate with empathy. Forehead avg. volume and empathy genes predict the level of empathy in a region.

GreenSlug ago

Its a true story.

I myself believe that the percentage of savage in my family lineage (native american, which is basically distant asian) allows me to temper my white empathy. I dont like to hurt people, i enjoy helping people, that deserve it. And while i dont like hurting people, i am very willing to hurt those that genuinely deserve it, and on a larger scale i have no qualms with letting literally every single foreigner starve to death in utter misery, if thats what it takes to keep MY people happy and healthy. Maybe it's being a man and not some soyboy faggot, but i think i go even beyond that. If it was necessary to bayonet mexican toddlers through a fence in order to keep MY people happy and healthy, then hand me that bayonet, i gots stabbin to do. I know i can be savage. But I've also stopped and helped people broke down on the road more than anyone else i know. I've bought my friends and family food beyond what they think is reasonable, theyll say things like "wow mr moneybags", no, you are hungry and im buying food, you are part of MY people, and i have the intelligence to budget enough that i can occasionally feed everyone around me, so here, just remember what ive done for you incase there comes a time where I dont have money and Im hungry, maybe you can pay me back with a sandwich.

Everyone should be more like me, kind to those who deserve it, and savage when necessary. Some things that are not fun to do are necessary. Some things are fun to do must not be done.

Gargilius ago

To the defense of the Neanderthals, they didn't have much in terms to precedents to look into...

Unlike us.

oaf ago

True, plus Their birth canal shape, and other things that aid IQ. CroMagnon and Neanderthals gave non-negroes over 1,000 now PROVEN higher IQ genes.

The two bombshell 80% DNA source of IQ studies ! :

2018 : 1,016 genes

paper = Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis In 269,867 Individuals Identifies New Genetic And Functional Links To Intelligence

Nature Genetics (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6

Now 1,016 genes are proven correlated to IQ (many are brain , skull, or birth canal related, some might be merely (non-negroid) genes in general.

2018 : 538 genes

UK Biobank DNA yields 538 genes that are linked to intellectual abilities - genetic effects on intelligence and personality

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20180313/Large-number-of-genes-associated-with-intelligence-discovered.aspx

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-017-0005-1

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0005-1

pop science description of the above :

538 genes that are thought to be linked to intelligence (by comparing 300,000 test subjects) :

http://www.frontlinegenomics.com/news/20419/using-dna-to-predict-intelligence/

IQ enhancement genes are all now COMPLETELY located, and Blacks lack them in africa.

Neanderthals were the smart ones.

boekanier ago

But the elite is going to do something about that 'problem': white women must copulate with niggers. The advertising is already showing the way.

SubhumanDeplorable2 ago

Impulse control, it’s why we have been told to mix breed.

Sheeitpost ago

There's over 30 lesser known hominids in the admixture of humanity they are only disclosing or able to identify neanderthal at present. Everyone is a caveman the same bodies walking around now were walking around in the stone age.

oaf ago

30? Only according to AI computer database model simulations.

only disclosing or able to identify neanderthal at present

NOT True. Perfect DNA sequence proof of Denisovans in Asians, and double-mixture of Denisovans in smarter higher IQ asian groups :

Modern asian humans (smart non-Thai asians) interbred with Denisovans TWICE in history :

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180315140718.htm

Some smarter asians picked up DNA, just as whites did, by breeding with Neanderthal&Denisovian half-breeds from conquering Neanderthal males... with full actual DNA sequenced from actual half-breed Denisovian+Neanderthal breeding bone fragment example ! :

https://wgno.com/2018/08/24/dna-reveals-first-known-child-of-neanderthal-and-denisovan-study-says/

Blacks interbred with one or TWO groups such as Homo Erectus (extinct long after last black common ancestor of 350,000 years ago). Some think Blacks mated with Homo heidelbergensis

9 LIVING CAVEMEN with ACTUAL NEGROID HOMO ERECTUS Y DNA INACT found in CAMEROON, and a camaroon negro found in USA with caveman DNA from 300,000 years ago completely unrelated to real humans ! :

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-03/uoa-hyc030413.php

https://archive.is/nopJj

A00a-L1149 (or A00a1) Y DNA is 350,000 years old in many Negroes. Negroes DO NOT have common ancestor human Y DNA nicknamed "Y-chromosomal Adam" but they keep changing the definition every 5 years, to not let Negros feel bad.

No african ""Homo Sapiens sapiens" might be descended from CroMagnon intermixing, because the only DNA we have is semi-convincing in math models :

Europe's Ancestors: Cro-Magnon 28,000 Years Old Had DNA Like Modern Humans:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715204741.htm

Niggers lack that CroMagnon DNA in whites, and Niggers lack the Neanderthal DNA found everywhere in everyone on earth EXCEPT in african niggers.

Anon765 ago

That's not true there's scientific consensus on at least two more other than neanderthal now. I think it might actually be three or four but I distinctly remember that that they found at least two species of Hobbit size people in the fossil records around the world. Most recent one I think was in the Philippines

1stResponder ago

One of them you are alluding to is called Homo Floresiensis found on the island of Flores in Indonesia. The other was indeed found in the Philippines and is called Homo luzonensis and was found on the northern island of Luzan. This is a place I have been to several times. Another important find was found to the north on the island of Taiwan (Homo tsaichangensis).

tokui ago

modern humans originated outside africa. some migrated into africa and bred down with archaic species - this is the ghost ape in their dna.

waringi ago

This is true. I studied biology and knew they were full of shit when they said Africa is the home of Homo Sapiens because they have greater genetic diversity.

The first lesson in evolution "Mutations, in turn, increase genetic variation, the raw material of evolution. So warm weather means higher metabolism, which means higher mutation rates — which may mean that warm-weather species evolve more quickly than cold-weather species."

Hot climates create more mutations, not just through metabolism but sunlight also damages DNA which can get passed on. Of course Africans have greater DNA mutations. They still lack major DNA changes that Non African populations have, ie, what makes humans human.

oaf ago

100% True, in all 2019 papers!

Blacks are VERY non human

Note that the "Out of Africa" theory is now UNSUPPORTED by any fossil evidence!

GREECE : New fossils suggest human ancestors evolved in Europe, not Africa :

https://bigthink.com/surprising-science/evolution-europe

First Human Ancestor Came from Europe Not Africa, 7.2 Million-year-old Fossils Indicate :

https://www.newsweek.com/first-hominin-europe-east-africa-human-evolution-613494

Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa, scientists find :

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/

Scientists Look To Europe As Evolutionary Seat : Found in Germany 20 years ago, this specimen is about 16.5 million years old:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/02/020219075535.htm

A 210,000-year-old skull (Apidima 1) has been identified as the earliest modern human

https://phys.org/news/2019-07-oldest-africa-reset-human-migration.html

Study reveals that humans migrated from Europe to Israel 40,000 years ago [NOT from Africa]

https://m.phys.org/news/2019-11-reveals-humans-migrated-europe-levant.html

https://files.catbox.moe/dn6u0z.jpg

Full shocking paper (it goes out of way to indicate Negroes are non-human) :

Science quote : (even prior to recent 350,000 year discovery in DNA) :

2012 : "All the presuppositions posited in support of the Out-of-Africa hypothesis fail to hold up under simple scrutiny" :

from :

Re-Examining the Out-of-Africa Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids). Part 2. SNPs, Haplogroups and Haplotypes in the Y Chromosome of Chimpanzee and Humans

paper :

https://files.catbox.moe/fsszbi.pdf

MODERN species and sub species proposed names of various Homo shit-skins (detailed but lacking DNA refs) :

https://propertarianism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/the-species-of-great-apes.pdf

Neanderthal genes (lacking only in Negros) contributes much of the known 538 genes for higher IQ.

Science has proven many times that Blacks are VERY non human

Of the 538 genes for above 100 IQ intelligence, west african Negroes and Australian aborigines LACK most of the smart genes!

Look at bottom of this list of IQ from composited science paper research :

https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country

Sri Lanka - 79 IQ !!!    
Zambia - 79    
Democratic Republic of the Congo - 78    
Nepal - 78    
Qatar - 78    
Comoros - 77    
South Africa - 77    
Cape Verde - 76    
Congo - 76    
Mauritania - 76    
Senegal - 76    
Mali - 74    
Namibia - 74    
Ghana - 73    
Tanzania - 72    
Central African Republic - 71    
Jamaica - 71    
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines - 71    
Sudan - 71    
Antigua and Barbuda - 70    
Benin - 70    
Botswana - 70    
Rwanda - 70    
Togo - 70    
Burundi - 69    
Cote d'Ivoire - 69    
Ethiopia - 69    
Malawi - 69    
Niger - 69    
Angola - 68    
Burkina Faso - 68    
Chad - 68    
Djibouti - 68    
Somalia - 68    
Swaziland - 68    
Dominica - 67    
Guinea - 67    
Guinea-Bissau - 67    
Haiti - 67    
Lesotho - 67    
Liberia - 67    
Saint Kitts and Nevis - 67    
Sao Tome and Principe - 67    
The Gambia - 66    
Cameroon - 64    
Gabon - 64    
Mozambique - 64    
Saint Lucia - 62    
Equatorial Guinea - 59 IQ

Equatorial Guinea - 59 IQ !!!

The smartest countries all have the least brown or black skins.

The problem is that ALL humans on earth except blacks have brain folding genes from RECENT cross breeding with NEANDERTHALS (yes even everyone in south america), and the asians have these genes by breeding with DENISOVIANS (who also had bred earlier with NEANDERTHALS). And the SMARTEST asians bred at two points in history with DENISOVIANS, while the water-niggers and Thais only interbred one time.

Modern asian humans (smart non-Thai asians) interbred with Denisovans TWICE in history :

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180315140718.htm

Some smarter asians picked up DNA, just as whites did, by breeding with Neanderthal&Denisovian half-breeds from conquering Neanderthal males... with full actual DNA sequenced from actual half-breed Denisovian+Neanderthal breeding bone fragment example ! :

https://wgno.com/2018/08/24/dna-reveals-first-known-child-of-neanderthal-and-denisovan-study-says/

GENES 80% Predict your IQ!!!

538 genes that are thought to be linked to intelligence (by comparing 300,000 test subjects) :

http://www.frontlinegenomics.com/news/20419/using-dna-to-predict-intelligence/

Table showing over 25 IQ related specific genes that MOSTLY are missing in africans:

https://files.catbox.moe/2pqwi6.png

The percentage of Neanderthal DNA in modern black humans is zero !!! (they interbred 300,000 to 185,000 years ago with a ape-like hominid, probably a version of Homo heidelbergensis branch):

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/dtcgenetictesting/neanderthaldna

9 LIVING CAVEMEN with ACTUAL NEGROID HOMO ERECTUS Y DNA INACT found in CAMEROON, and a camaroon negro found in USA with caveman DNA from 300,000 years ago completely unrelated to real humans ! :

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-03/uoa-hyc030413.php

https://archive.is/nopJj

A00a-L1149 (or A00a1) Y DNA is 350,000 years old in many Negroes. Negroes DO NOT have common ancestor human Y DNA nicknamed "Y-chromosomal Adam" but they keep changing the definition every 5 years, to not let Negores feel bad :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-chromosomal_Adam

US Gov scientists agree that some Negroes discovered to be non-human, and Negroes interbred with ape-like creatures long long ago :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591855/

Shocking quotes from PMC4947341 "Hominin interbreeding and the evolution of human variation":

one-fifth of the Neanderthal genome may lurk within modern humans... (but totally absent in Negroes)

SUBHUMAN! interbreeding between Sub-Saharan Africans and an as-yet-unknown hominin, such as H. heidelbergensis...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947341/

Some think that the Negroes that bred with H. heidelbergensis were "Homo sapiens idaltu", and that "Homo sapiens idaltu" thus evolved into Negroes, while actual humans descended from 'Homo sapiens idaltu' leaving africa and interbreeding with Denisovian+Neanderthal becoming real humans , now called "Homo Sapiens sapiens) [note the extra sapiens].

Some Russian and Chinese scientists currently denounce that and say its the opposite, and that 'Homo sapiens idaltu' ENTERED africa and interbred with the indigenous Negroes (H. heidelbergensis).

Homo erectus went extinct only 50,000 years ago (100,000 tops) and was provably low IQ and PROVEN LAZY, similar to current Blacks, but unknown how much DNA admixture of Homo erectus is in the modern negro, if any, due to heat damage of artifact DNA, Negroes diverged from all real humans 350,000 years ago, as proven and mentioned frequently already (current Negro Y-DNA A00a-L1149 is 350,000 years old!).

Laziness in Homo erectus proof YES LAZY BLACKS! :

https://www.livescience.com/63308-homo-erectus-laziness-extinction.html

NOT JUST LAZY hominids, but LOW IQ, lazy Blacks never invented any crops, domesticated animals, or even the WHEEL!

Whites & Blacks 100 FACTS! Blacks never invented the wheel!:

http://yun.complife.info/100facts.htm

Even though Blacks are now proven from over 350,000 years ago, vs real Humans nowadays, There were MANY types of Hominids that looked like humans, right up until each were killed off and replaced by Modern Humans.

No matter how you organize the timeline, DNA does not lie. Blacks are an unrelated species. Most land mammals are radically different species after 120,000 year separation, and Blacks separated from all real humans 350,000 years ago.

Gorillas : Scientists claim at least two branches of gorillas are not merely a different subspecies but ARE DIFFERENT SPECIES (over 120,000 years apart), yet gorillas have far more DNA in common as a percent to each gorilla species than ANY Negro on earth has to ANY Non-negro !!! Negroes ARE A DIFFERENT SPECIES according to scientific logic, and not Homo Sapiens at all!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla

TL/DR : Negroes are NOT Human. Y DNA from a handful of talking apes in Cameroon PROVE that Negros are not HUMAN and Negros share few genes with all other races, and are almost closer to chimps, than the dna "distance" between two of the main species of identical looking gorilla species!

blueblur ago

Damn bro write a book I’ll buy it.

Holonomic ago

It's either copied or plagiarized from that shit-site reddit.

AnotherGrayman ago

If it's new info that redpills someone on race, who gives a shit where it came from?

Fuckyounigger ago

just a jew trying to get you to not care dont fall for it

oaf ago

@Holonomic is 100% backward wrong!

@Holonomic erroneously located someone borrowing my own 100% created words and reddit user/Infearmal , whom is VERY similar in mental spirit to me, pasted it on Reddit and user/Infearmal said SPECIFICALLY in the top that user/Infearmal DID NOT AUTHOR it but rather I did. Read this line from user/Infearmal :

Ok pal. I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet commenting about this meme. Thanksfully someone has found your whinny hideout and linked to this page. We're not even talking about being subhumans anymore.

That user on reddit copying my works wrote :

"I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet"

That "someone else" is me, from NOT on reddit. @Holonomic cannot read a whole post.

I have no active reddit account, and only posted 4 times in my past before being banned there for posting statistics on Black welfare in the USA from the Government statistics. I am NOT user/Infearmal.

@Holonomic is trying to be a jew shill because one of his parents is a Negro and being half black or quarter Black, @Holonomic DOES NOT like reading DNA FACTS about Negroes being a provable different SPECIES not SUBSPECIES.

I thought I had to respond. But I am very very happy to see a red pill of mine pasted nearly verbatim onto reddit! I am smiling so much this hour from spotting it on reddit in user comments even if an admin probably deleted it or hid it.

thanks for defending me @AnotherGrayman, but the repaster on reddit specifically typed this phrase that a caucasian can read and comprehend : "I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet", and thus @Holonomic is spreading Jew lie disenchantment and narrative shifting and "attacking the messenger not the message".

TL/DR : @Holonomic is hilariously incorrect, and my works did not originate on reddit.

Holonomic ago

Quit spamming me you fucking faggot shithead.

You plagiarize your shit, or copy it and when you get called out you flip your bean like a deranged faggot.

AnotherGrayman ago

Keep fighting the good fight.

Activist agitators pushing information to normies is what got the liberal left their power.

Everyone who wasn't a communist shithead didn't feel the need to push their views.

"The penalty for not participating in politics is that you end up being ruled by your inferiors."

Keep redpilling!

Fuckyounigger ago

Not you the op of the post I replied to above ;)

i_scream_trucks ago

blacks have no neanderthal dna.... most whites have very little neanderthal dna

as a ranga i have a HIGHER THAN AVERAGE level of neanderthal DNA.

does that make me superhuman?

AnotherGrayman ago

Serious answer?

Think of it like this... you have a higher chance of reaching a higher potential than someone with lesser DNA, but you could still definitely spend your entire life as a worthless fucktard if you make wrong choices.

canbot ago

There is no guarantee of course, but it does seem that we get our intelligence from the neanderthal DNA, as the neanderthal is known for having a large brain. But given how many genes there are it is not exactly probable that additional neanderthal DNA will be intelligence related. Your asking such a question suggests that you aren't particularly intelligent, however as a population I would expect that those with more neanderthal DNA are in fact smarter.

Anon765 ago

Well it does make you a tiny bit more caveman but at least you're not a Nigger.

i_scream_trucks ago

... but if you are between me and the nigger doesnt that make you a subcaveman pleb?

Anon765 ago

Now I want Gibs!

Anon765 ago

Fuck!

weredawg ago

Lol no it makes you a caveman. Fuckin honkey.

ardvarcus ago

If there were any pragmatic rationality among scientists, the Negro would be classed as a different species from white Europeans. The differences between the races are that significant.

gungasnake ago

Sorry, but that is totally wrong. There are giant differences in culture and technologies between various human groups but,genetically, all humans in the universe are one family.

Empire_of_the_mind ago

If you want some real wild shit, check out the links here documenting historical cases of human hybrids with, uh, unlikely animals.

http://www.macroevolution.net/human-hybrids.html

SearchVoatBot ago

This comment was linked from this anonymous v/ScienceAnon comment.

Posted automatically (#87967) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@ardvarcus: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)

oaf ago

SPECIES (not just sub-species)!!? TRUE!!

As when the definition of a "planet" was all agreed on , then evidence came out that Pluto broke the rules AGREED ON for "planet", there was a "messy situation" were every 2nd grade school book on earth for kids as well as every text book, had to be re-printed and suddenly omit Pluto as a planet!

PLUTO WAS NEVER A PLANET, due to science definitions made earlier for the word "PLANET"

NEGROES are a different hominid species than all other existing humans on earth!

NEGROES WERE NEVER the same species as humans, due to science definitions made earlier for the word "SPECIES"

I and not talking about SUBSPECIES, and am being literal, and using the word "SPECIES"

We know this from DNA. DNA does not lie. The definition of species in 2019 and recent years is two factors :

  • 1 > DNA drift distance of under 120,000 years
    AND
  • 2 > Able to mate and reproduce a fertile viable offspring, both male or female, AND not breaking rule #1 (DNA drift distance of under 120,000 years)

Gorilla SPECIES (species not subspecies) can breed and produce viable fertile offspring. Yet their DNA is probably drifted over 120,000 years.

(Gorilla gorilla vs. Gorilla beringei) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla

Bear SPECIES (species not subspecies) can breed and produce viable fertile offspring. Yet their DNA is probably drifted over 120,000 years.

http://bearwithus.org/8-bears-of-the-world/

"Polar Bears Evolved Just 150,000 Years Ago" : https://www.livescience.com/10956-polar-bears-evolved-150-000-years.html

The Gray wolf, Red wolf and Ethiopian wolf SPECIES (species not subspecies) can breed and produce viable fertile offspring. Yet their DNA is probably drifted less than 120,000 years (100,000 for Ethiopian Wolf) : http://wolffacts.org/ethiopian-wolf-facts.html

Animals that drifted far more than the ridiculous 350,000 year separation from Negros and true humans, can interbreed too. It is uncommon but possible. In these other mammals many fetuses die and are absorbed, but occasionally you can get live births by breeding countless mammals against each other, even with different numbers of chromosomes. :

Here Are 18 Amazing Animal Hybrids You Won’t Believe Exist But Are Completely Real:

http://boredomtherapy.com/real-animal-hybrids/

ASTOUNDING! Look at those!

I show those in that link to demonstrate that animal life forms can be forced to mate with each other in hilarious ways, and some produce fertile offspring, but DNA age drift is used as the definition of species.

So yes, you can mate a true human (Homo Sapiens sapiens, with Neanderthal IQ gene admixture)... with a Hominid such as the major negro ethnicities in Africa (whom lack even a speck of Neanderthal DNA) :

  • Tigrean
  • Amharic
  • Sudanese-Barya
  • Nilotic
  • Funji Nilotic
  • Tuareg-Beja Cushitic
  • Nubian
  • Wolof-Peul-Serer
  • Bantu MOST common in recent 300 years
  • Bedic Bantu
  • West African
  • Mbuti Pygmy
  • Sara Nilotic-Biaka Pygmy
  • San Khosian-Somali
  • Khoi Khosian
  • Hazda Khosian
  • Sandawe Khosian

Above list also summarized on MODERN species and sub species (races) proposed names of various Homo shit-skins (detailed but lacking DNA refs) :

https://propertarianism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/the-species-of-great-apes.pdf

All those Negroid hominids can be bred with true humans, and produce fertile offspring, but that does not make those 350,000 year divergent subspecies the same as true modern Humans.

The "fertile offspring, disregarding DNA evidence" is the OLD definition, that is why we have Bear, Gorilla, and Wolf SPECIES (not subspecies, but actual SPECIES), because their DNA drifted over 120,000 years of separation.

Blacks predate by hundreds of thousands of years of deviation, the relatively recent emergence of true humans, and far far far before Humans picked up IQ genes from Neanderthals. Pure black lack any Neanderthal DNA.

ALL true humans (non african negroes) have some intermixed Neanderthal DNA, adding many brain boosting IQ genes, All humans everywhere on earth have these very very recent genes, but not one african pure bred negro.

NEANDERTHAL BRAIN DNA?

Neanderthal genes (lacking only in Negros) contributes much of the known 538 genes for higher IQ.

538 genes that are thought to be linked to intelligence (by comparing 300,000 test subjects) :

http://www.frontlinegenomics.com/news/20419/using-dna-to-predict-intelligence/

Of the 538 genes for above 100 IQ intelligence, which can 80% predict your IQ, west african Negroes and Australian aborigines LACK most of the smart genes!

ALL humans on earth except blacks have brain folding genes from RECENT cross breeding with NEANDERTHALS (yes even everyone in south america), and the asians have these genes by breeding with DENISOVIANS (who also had bred earlier with NEANDERTHALS).

Except for negroes, in latest studies of massive DNA databases, all humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) alive have 1% to 2.9% Neanderthal DNA on average per nation.

All Whites ALSO have lots of proven Cro-Magnon DNA too!:

Europe's Ancestors: Cro-Magnon 28,000 Years Old Had DNA Like Modern Humans:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715204741.htm

And the SMARTEST asians bred at two points in history with DENISOVIANS, for more IQ, while the water-niggers and Thais only interbred one time.

Modern asian Humans (smart non-Thai asians) interbred with Denisovans TWICE in history :

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180315140718.htm

Some smarter asians picked up DNA, just as whites did, by breeding with Neanderthal&Denisovian half-breeds from conquering Neanderthal males... with full actual DNA sequenced from actual half-breed Denisovian+Neanderthal breeding bone fragment example ! :

Wow! DNA proof of a 1st gen half-breed Denisovian+Neanderthal (typical source of asian intelligence): 1st gen!!!

https://wgno.com/2018/08/24/dna-reveals-first-known-child-of-neanderthal-and-denisovan-study-says/

Sadly, the percentage of Neanderthal DNA in modern black humans is zero !!! (they interbred 300,000 to 185,000 years ago with a ape-like hominid, probably a version of Homo heidelbergensis branch):

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/dtcgenetictesting/neanderthaldna

9 LIVING CAVEMEN with ACTUAL NEGROID HOMO ERECTUS Y DNA INACT found in CAMEROON, and a camaroon negro found in USA with caveman DNA from 300,000 years ago completely unrelated to real humans ! :

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-03/uoa-hyc030413.php

A00a-L1149 (or A00a1) Y DNA is 350,000 years old in many Negroes. Negroes DO NOT have common ancestor human Y DNA nicknamed "Y-chromosomal Adam" but they keep changing the definition every 5 years, to not let Negroes feel bad :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-chromosomal_Adam

US Gov scientists agree that some Negroes discovered to be non-human, and Negroes interbred with ape-like creatures long long ago :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591855/

Shocking quotes from PMC4947341 "Hominin interbreeding and the evolution of human variation":

one-fifth of the Neanderthal genome may lurk within modern humans... (but totally absent in Negroes)

SUBHUMAN! interbreeding between Sub-Saharan Africans and an as-yet-unknown hominin, such as H. heidelbergensis...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947341/

Some think that the Negroes that bred with H. heidelbergensis were "Homo sapiens idaltu", and that "Homo sapiens idaltu" thus evolved into Negroes, while actual humans descended from 'Homo sapiens idaltu' leaving africa and interbreeding with Denisovian+Neanderthal becoming real humans , now called "Homo Sapiens sapiens) [note the extra sapiens].

Some Russian and Chinese scientists currently denounce that and say its the opposite, and that 'Homo sapiens idaltu' ENTERED africa and interbred with the indigenous Negroes (H. heidelbergensis).

Its been known since 1874 that Blacks are NOT human, and lots of data to prove it.

The negro ape in 2nd most famous biology book ever written, by famed Ernst Haeckel, 1874, Page 527 of 780 :

WOW! :

https://files.catbox.moe/e2pi6l.jpg

Homo erectus went extinct only 50,000 years ago (100,000 tops) and was provably low IQ and PROVEN LAZY, similar to current Blacks, but unknown how much DNA admixture of Homo erectus is in the modern negro, if any, due to heat damage of artifact DNA, Negroes diverged from all real humans 350,000 years ago, as proven and mentioned frequently already (current Negro Y-DNA A00a-L1149).

Laziness in Homo erectus proof YES LAZY BLACKS! :

https://www.livescience.com/63308-homo-erectus-laziness-extinction.html

NOT JUST LAZY hominids, but LOW IQ, lazy Blacks never invented any crops, domesticated animals, or even the WHEEL!

Whites & Blacks 100 FACTS! Blacks never invented the wheel!:

http://yun.complife.info/100facts.htm

Even though Blacks are now proven from over 350,000 years ago, vs real Humans nowadays, There were MANY types of Hominids that looked like humans, right up until each were killed off and replaced by Modern Humans.

No matter how you organize the timeline, DNA does not lie. Blacks are an unrelated species. Most land mammals are radically different species after 120,000 year separation, and Blacks separated from all real humans 350,000 years ago.

TL;DR: Negroes are not HUMAN! (((Small Colleges))) except in advanced biology courses, still sometimes re-teach old erroneous definition of the word "Species". Today only DNA is used to differentiate species, and Negroes are PROVABLY a dramatically different species of Hominid.

Phantom42 ago

The beasts of the field...

cantaloupe6 ago

1016 genes linked to IQ - probably more found

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0152-6

Amyway we're exactly the same in every way.

1stResponder ago

A lot of information here to digest.

One caveat to the Neanderthal DNA narrative. Hybrids always produce overall inferior traits. This doesn't mean all traits are inferior. It simply means the sum is inferior to the parent. In fact, Nature always eliminates hybridity. Again, it doesn't mean that hybridity never occurs. It can, but is rare. The only place hybridity commonly occurs is from anthropogenic manipulation. Most all of this occurs in captivity.

An example of hybrid inviability in humans are the many congenital and hereditary diseases of mulattoes. For one thing, hybridity has knack for introducing hereditary disease into the gene pool. If you look at the Jewish community, which is indeed very hybridized, the number of hereditary diseases is by far more than any other racial group. A mulattoes avg. IQ is about 85. It is not coincidental this number happens to be the avg. IQ between a Caucasian (100 IQ) and Negro (IQ 70). What's more are the psychological diseases of mulattoes, which are much higher than for each parent racial group. The same deleterious issues are also found with much higher incidences of congenital diseases.

Intermixing with Neanderthals would produce the same. This is why I believe the entire Neanderthal DNA in Caucasians is highly suspect and yet another case of selling a false narrative. For one, does intelligence does not increase by intermixing with a less intelligent species.

oaf ago

PARTS of what you said are true, but its a complicated topic after many generations of further DNA mixing.

I have seen such paraphrased papers in the past related to this assertion you stated :

Hybrids always produce overall inferior traits

And for FIRST GENERATION, and maybe even up to 10th generation, that may be VERY correct, in fact most self-abort, but....

As for Neanderthal admixture, it is a well-proven DNA fact that CERTAIN large gene spans were incorporated in the survivors and "best fit" after many thousands of years of further evolution pressure. The DNA mixing happened a couple times, but well after mankind entered Africa from Europe as CroMag and mated with non-Neanderthal hominids in Africa. No DNA mixing with Neanderthals happened to Blacks.

The outside-of-africa mixing with Neanderthal happened frequently and the FIRST BORN that was not self aborted in womb, or sterile, as you correctly stated regarding mixing being BAD, those first born generation 50:50 admixtures self selected less fatal combinations of chromosomes.

It takes MANY changes across many chromosomes to alter a mammal skeleton. That is why humans have the same total number of bones, including inner ear, as a mouse has. The same total number of bones. By mixing with Neanderthals humans did NOT become so tall that they were above 6 feet tall at age 8 years, as proven in "tooth daily growth rings" of Neanderthal 8 year old skeletons, but the new humans, us, DID get wider birth canals for larger brains.

Larger brains and brain folding are the single most important evolutionary push, but the hardest trick for a set of many chromosomes to achieve (alteration of a skeleton). Each major step in evolution for human Brain evolution involves BRAIN FOLDING, including from marsupial to mammal, from shrew to primate, from chimp-looking Hominid to Human, and dramatically so, from Negroid to Homo Sapiens.

We know for a FACT that many high IQ genes came from Neanderthals, and in fact modern Asians got the same high IQ genes by mating with Hominids that also mated with Neanderthals. Here is a FIRST GENERATION 50:50 one in a million lucky discovery of two Hominids mating and skeleton being located : https://wgno.com/2018/08/24/dna-reveals-first-known-child-of-neanderthal-and-denisovan-study-says/

You raised many many different topics in your statement and too many to respond to, but be aware all have strong caveats to each, but because of "near extinction bottlenecks" across humans history, Human DNA is cleaned up dramatically, and designed well for incest. Incest in Humans is far far less DNA risk than other mammals. Its not good, but its a complex topic, and a lucky side effect of having DNA cleaned up by all varieties of Humans wiped out from competition and calamity.

These two statements are incorrect the way you wrote them :

This is why I believe the entire Neanderthal DNA in Caucasians is highly suspect

Only critical parts were taken and KEPT after 30 generations, but to alter birth canal (skeletal change) lots of DNA was required to borrow, and happy accident of taking other brain folding DNA was useful too.

For one, intelligence does not increase by intermixing with a less intelligent species.

It can, rarely, if the result is a combination of only the good parts : Neurological proven, as in this list of known high IQ genes :

2018 : 1,016 genes for higher IQ score :

paper = Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis In 269,867 Individuals Identifies New Genetic And Functional Links To Intelligence

Nature Genetics (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6

Now 1,016 genes are proven correlated to IQ (many are brain , skull, or birth canal related, some might be merely (non-negroid) genes in general.

The Neanderthals have been proven to have given true humans many of those 1,016 genes.

Negros are so non-human, that some varieties of Negro have 3 MILLION, yes an eye watering 3 MILLION mutational DNA base pair differences than all true living Humans that are not Negroids:

Look! :

3 million single letter negro DNA mutations found in 2012, NEVER seen in any other white on earth :

https://www.nature.com/news/hunter-gatherer-genomes-a-trove-of-genetic-diversity-1.11076

Not all those 3 million negroid mutations are too damaging. Some are how a tooth glows under ultraviolet light, some are salt composition of sweat or urine, some are earwax specific, or other excretion systems.

1stResponder ago

Neanderthals were so vastly different from modern humans physically, the difference between us is greater than a gorilla to a homo sapien.

In regards to intelligence, you are correct in that there are rare occasions of "smarter" hybrids, but the gene pool isn't there to sustain it. In addition, there are so many other deleterious genetic diseases as a result of hybridity, it is eliminated. This is Nature's Law for maintaining its immutable order. With Negroes, the amount of melanin has an inverse affect on intelligence.

Researcher and author Loyd Pye clearly shows how the fossil record is falsified to establish a narrative. Pye also shows the Neanderthal footprints are identical to Sasquatch footprints. He goes on showing the smallest finger bone of a neanderthal was in comparison to modern humans, the size of a thumb bone. Neanderthal bones are not only radically different from humans, but are twice as thick. Even the gait of neanderthals was radically different from humans. Almost all hybrids are the result of man-made influences. This can be seen occurring in some western states. The over hunting of deer, along with urban development, and other factors has caused a large imbalance in buck-to-doe ratio. This has led to stress and unnatural mating of mule deer with white-tailed deer. The hybrid offspring verify my point in that mule deer have a completely different survival strategy than white-tailed deer. This fact is clearly observed in mule/white-tailed deer hybrids. For example, the gait of the mule deer is markedly different than a white-tailed deer. When startled, mule deer exhibit a stiff four-legged bounding gait, while white-tailed deer use an irregular jumping gallop to escape predators. With hybrids, their gait is not a jumping gallop as a white-tailed deer or the mule deer stot, but use locomotion patterns intermediate the two species. Galloping hybrids are slower than white-tailed deer. Other incompatible anti-predator strategies include inquisitive behavior on approach of a predator instead of a prompt “fight or flight” response. The hybrids are easy prey for mountain lions and wolves.

You have provided very good information, but the archeological record is indeed falsified to prevent us from knowing our true origin. It is falsified to establish a "story" or narrative, which amounts to a fable for us to believe. I suggest watching Loyd Pye's video - "Lloyd Pye Everything You Know Is Wrong" at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5qJYwfAju8

oaf ago

It is DNA fact, actual FACT that Neanderthal DNA has been sequenced and compared and proven to be up to 3% of many Human samples DNA.

You keep naysaying that concrete proven fact, though complete with shared databases, gene sample specimens, and published papers based on the shared DNA sequence analysis.

Are you seriously claiming Neanderthals DNA is not in modern Humans, and that DNA itself is a hoax?

I am now starting to think you are trolling me.

the amount of melanin has an inverse affect on intelligence

Totally true, and true in India, but when you slice a thin specimen of human brain ou become horrified to learn that MELANIN POISONS BRAIN TISSUE, you can see the melanin pigment IN THE NEGRO BRAIN WHEREVER THERE ARE TISSUE LAYERS!

Other melanins belong in brain for funtion :

Neuromelanin : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromelanin

Oddly the largest papers from 100 years ago overlooked Negro melanin in brain, despite jumping up in your eyes under a microscope! : https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/49594/1000050402_ftp.pdf?sequence=1

I think they were not studying neuroscience at the cellular level in that old famous paper.

IQ is mostly from brain folding and other morphology, and SOME very dark genius Indians exist, but in general, the darker the skin the lower the IQ.

archeological record is indeed falsified

I used to think that was a crazy claim, but it is now shown that (((someone))) pushed false narrative of "Out of Africa" and that (((someone))) maintained an elaborate hoax in science for 50 years or more.

DNA now proved it was false, but you for some reason even distrust DNA, even if someone were to give you the computer files of the DNA sequences for you to review yourself?

DNA is fact. Humans mating with Neanderthals is fact.

1stResponder ago

"You keep naysaying that concrete proven fact, though complete with shared databases, gene sample specimens, and published papers based on the shared DNA sequence analysis."

That's because being such an old-timer I've experienced over the many decades several "proven facts" that turned out to be false. (Egyptology is one good example). As a result, I have become a healthy skeptic, especially in areas where the research isn't available for me to personally examine. Indeed, DNA is very involved. Forensic DNA in criminal cases has been sold to the courts as incontrovertible evidence. However, it appears to be much more involved. It turns out several unfortunate people have gone to prison because their DNA was misinterpreted or as a result of outright fraud. It's not an outlier few cases either. There are other interpretation issues as well.

This example happens to correlate to other DNA studies as well. Not that the DNA interpretation is necessarily erroneous, but it goes deeper to the level of the influences for getting such results. It may be another example of following the money. In modern times, there are so many cases of "fake" science that it is pandemic. A case in point is "global warming", where data has been actually altered to agree with a certain narrative. The so-called "hockey-stick" study is a good example of "fake" science. Another example is the recent article about ancient bubblegum DNA belonging to a dark-skinned Scandinavian. The article was professionally written with an awesome CGI rendering of some dark-skinned girl, who looks surprisingly like the famous Afghanistani girl on the cover of the National geographic. Have you ever wondered who pays for the production of these incredible renderings like this? It's suppose to grab your imagination. These depictions are expensive and paid for for the purpose of selling their narrative they want you to believe. The financiers of this ridiculous bubblegum story want you confused, angered, and demoralized so that they can push other agendas through, while you are preoccupied with self doubt.

Don't get me wrong. You have presented some very interesting (and titillating) subject matter, including links. There is certainly more to the Neanderthal DNA narrative that isn't reported though. Notwithstanding, I did read an interesting tidbit elsewhere that stated - "Hybridization between humans and Neanderthals has resulted in a low level of Neanderthal ancestry scattered across the genomes of many modern-day humans. After hybridization, on average, selection appears to have removed Neanderthal alleles from the human population." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100956/

In response to this statement, one of the methods Nature uses to eliminate aberrations (hybridity) and to preserve species is by diffusion. This is actually rare in Nature. I suspect whenever it does exist, it is a result of extreme stress induced by habitat loss and other factors relating to human encroachment and manipulation.

If the hybrid is able to mate, it will seek to mate with the species that it most resembles. An example of this in humans are mulattoes are almost always left with mating with Negroes. With animals, courtship is hardwired through many complex factors. This is an extremely high barrier to overcome too. This is because all species are geared to establish "optimal balance", which is unique to each species. As a part of this, a male from a similar genetic background provides DNA/cells that are beneficial to the mother and offspring's immune system. Contrary to this, the cells/DNA from a racially different partner are in conflict and are attacked through what is known as a cytokine storm. The body's own immune system becomes the greatest threat to longevity of the female (and hybrid baby). The health consequences can be immediate and neuro-immunological diseases involving inflammation are evident through many diseases producing systemic sepsis, as defined by persistent hypotension, hyper- or hypothermia, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and often thrombocytopenia. Viral, bacterial, and fungal pulmonary infections all cause the sepsis syndrome, and these etiological agents are difficult to differentiate on clinical grounds. In some cases, persistent tissue damage without severe microbial infection in the lungs also is associated with a cytokine storm and clinical manifestations that mimic sepsis syndrome. In addition to lung infections, the cytokine storm is a consequence of severe infections in the gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, central nervous system, skin, joint spaces, and other sites. Other diseases take hold many, many years later. Microchimerism is a taboo subject having far greater implications on hybrids, including sterilization, than is published. The subject matter discussed above is only some of the known difficulties and consequences hybrids experience.

Relating this to Neanderthal DNA in humans only underscores my skepticism. I am not claiming the Neanderthal DNA is necessarily erroneous. It appears to violate Nature's Law of maintaining species. There is undoubtedly much more to the story not being told. If you watched the Loyd Pye video I linked above, you'll certainly see how this all plays into the incredibility of it. Again, Neanderthals were so vastly different than humans, that they are as distant as gorillas are to humans. If sterilization wasn't one factor, the deleterious affects of microchimerism, congenital diseases, deformation mutations, courtship rejection, banishment, survival strategies, and many other issues would have to somehow be overcome.

McPooperton ago

This is pretty cool but as soon as this gets out they will change the definition just like they changed the IQ cutoff that defines you as a retard.

oaf ago

CORRECT! But its a very very problematic issue this time to achieve a workable redefinition that still includes Negros as same species, let alone sub-species. I wonder how they will achieve such a thing. The biggest joke so far is the unsupportable lie that Whites descended from african evolved Hominids (Out Of Africa).

Holonomic ago

Spamming, or plagiarizing this stuff oaf?

oaf ago

"plagiarizing?" LIAR! BACKWARD!

@Holonomic is 100% backward wrong!

@Holonomic erroneously located someone borrowing my own 100% created words and reddit user/Infearmal , whom is VERY similar in mental spirit to me, pasted it on Reddit and user/Infearmal said SPECIFICALLY in the top that user/Infearmal DID NOT AUTHOR it but rather I did. Read this line from user/Infearmal :

Ok pal. I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet commenting about this meme. Thanksfully someone has found your whinny hideout and linked to this page. We're not even talking about being subhumans anymore.

That user on reddit copying my works wrote :

"I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet"

That "someone else" is me, from NOT on reddit. @Holonomic cannot read a whole post.

I have no active reddit account, and only posted 4 times in my past before being banned there for posting statistics on Black welfare in the USA from the Government statistics. I am NOT user/Infearmal.

@Holonomic is trying to be a jew shill because one of his parents is a Negro and being half black or quarter Black, @Holonomic DOES NOT like reading DNA FACTS about Negroes being a provable different SPECIES not SUBSPECIES.

I thought I had to respond. But I am very very happy to see a red pill of mine pasted nearly verbatim onto reddit! I am smiling so much this hour from spotting it on reddit in user comments even if an admin probably deleted it or hid it.

The repaster on reddit specifically typed this phrase that caucasians can read and comprehend : "I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet", and thus @Holonomic is spreading Jew lie disenchantment and narrative shifting and "attacking the messenger not the message".

TL/DR : All my writings are 100% correct and my own, and @Holonomic is hilariously incorrect, because my works did not originate on reddit.

Holonomic ago

Quit spamming me you fucking faggot.

You plagiarize your shit, or copy it and when you get called out you flip your bean like a deranged faggot.

Holonomic ago

Quit spamming me you fucking faggot asshole.

You plagiarize your shit, or copy it and when you get called out you flip your bean like a deranged faggot.

Holonomic ago

You either copied this from [d]eddit or you're spamming it.

Don't get me wrong....niggers are devolution in real time, but if you're just spamming, or plagiarizing then you can fuck off back to [d]eddit.

oaf ago

"plagiarizing?" LIAR!! BACKWARD!

@Holonomic is 100% backward wrong!

@Holonomic erroneously located someone borrowing my own 100% created words and reddit user/Infearmal , whom is VERY similar in mental spirit to me, pasted it on Reddit and user/Infearmal said SPECIFICALLY in the top that user/Infearmal DID NOT AUTHOR it but rather I did. Read this line from user/Infearmal :

Ok pal. I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet commenting about this meme. Thanksfully someone has found your whinny hideout and linked to this page. We're not even talking about being subhumans anymore.

That user on reddit copying my works wrote :

"I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet"

That "someone else" is me, from NOT on reddit. @Holonomic cannot read a whole post.

I have no active reddit account, and only posted 4 times in my past before being banned there for posting statistics on Black welfare in the USA from the Government statistics. I am NOT user/Infearmal.

@Holonomic is trying to be a jew shill because one of his parents is a Negro and being half black or quarter Black, @Holonomic DOES NOT like reading DNA FACTS about Negroes being a provable different SPECIES not SUBSPECIES.

I thought I had to respond. But I am very very happy to see a red pill of mine pasted nearly verbatim onto reddit! I am smiling so much this hour from spotting it on reddit in user comments even if an admin probably deleted it or hid it.

The repaster on reddit specifically typed this phrase that caucasians can read and comprehend : "I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet", and thus @Holonomic is spreading Jew lie disenchantment and narrative shifting and "attacking the messenger not the message".

TL/DR : All my writings are 100% correct and my own, and @Holonomic is hilariously wrong, because my works did not originate on reddit.

Holonomic ago

Quit spamming me you fucking faggot dicklicker.

You plagiarize your shit, or copy it and when you get called out you flip your bean like a deranged faggot.

22226983? ago

LMAO I'm so gonna try this next time some dick corrects me when I say "planet pluto" (etc).

"Ahar dur Pluto isn't a planet"

"You racist!"

"What? how would that make me racist? The criteria for planet excludes pluto..."

"That's a white supremacist dog whistle! Gorilla SPECIES, Bear SPECIES, Wolf SPECIES, Hominid SPECIES..."

oaf ago

I laughed. thanks.

PizzaGate-Is-Real ago

Not sure anyone would understand what you are trying to suggest in that scenario.

PizzaGate-Is-Real ago

The entire argument is premised on "DNA drift distance of under 120,000 years", for which no source is provided.

There do not seem to be any readily available references on this in search engines either.

Where is a source or reference on this claim?

oaf ago

....sigh... Repeat after me : "Gorilla SPECIES, Bear SPECIES, Wolf SPECIES." All those are 120,000 of Genetic Drift on the money.

DNA drift (Genetic Drift) is quantified in all modern papers as a numeric value but there are multiple common equations to provide the value summary. "Genetic Species Concept"

Prior to modern years, ignoring the 120,000 years genetic drift distance, and uses shorter timespans, 2 genera and 78 species of brown bears (Ursus arctos) existed. 78 species of brown bears!!!!! Now there is but one brown bear species, and only the four bear species. Why? Because of modern rules ignoring the old definition of species from 1920 (CH Merriam).

The value of 120,000 will be printed as a genetic drift value with allows some wiggle room, and furthermore needs to be converted from whatever equation being used from whatever taxonomic software is being used.

Its made more complex by drift of a single specific Chromosome in some research rather that "whole organism genome"

the first push to use DNA to clean up all the species classifications started when DNA sequencing became cheap and affordable... in 2009.

In fact the famous 2009 paper on the switchover written by "Robert J. Baker"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2771874/#R92

1stResponder ago

Genetic drift is a theory based on all too "linear" calculations. The 120,000 years is a best "guestimate" of these calculations based on observations at the cellular level. In other words, simple organisms like bacteria are used to determine a theory of genetic drift in very complex lifeforms like humans. There is no evidence of genetic drift. All species are immutable and follow Nature's order.

oaf ago

Its called MUTATION.

i think you skipped 8th grade biology. Even sunlight causes mutation in human skin (DNA damage for example). Many things cause mutation in egg cell or sperm cell creation.

MUTATION.

Now I am convinced you are not biologically educated based on you erroneously stating :

In other words, simple organisms like bacteria are used to determine a theory of genetic drift in very complex lifeforms like humans. There is no evidence of genetic drift. All species are immutable and follow Nature's order.

That's preposterous. All of life would be the same organism forever with no change, and also be a single cell at that, without evolution caused by mutation and selection.

1stResponder ago

Only in the world of Marvel Comics do you get greater powers from mutations. In the real world the very cold fact of reality is that mutations are deleterious and an aberration. Simple observation of Nature manifests everywhere that a very strict order is maintained and is indeed immutable. Your fairy-tale of Marvel-like transcending to a higher form of animals is laughable. Again, the hard-wired instinct of every living creature is achieved through "optimal balance." It explains why homogeneous people created great civilizations and why "diversity" and its outcome of miscegenation always caused the detritus of innovation and the destruction of civilization. Hybrid inviability is a Law of Nature. The sum of traits in a hybrid is inferior to the parent.

I noticed you have resorted to ad hominems, since you cannot explain away Nature's immutable laws. I presented one example of Nature's continuous maintaining of 30 subspecies of white-tailed deer. This was after you claimed that species "freely intermix". The proof is so contrary to your claim, in a court of law it would be deemed a classic summary judgment against you. Furthermore, I provided a well documented case of anthropogenic encroachment whereby buck-to-doe ratios have been greatly skewed due to over-hunting mule deer and white-tailed deer whereby stress has caused an aberration of hybridity. The survival traits of "fight-or-flight" are very different between the two species. The hybrid are easy prey for mountain lions and wolves. It's Nature's strict law of eliminating aberrations. In Nature, hybridity is always confined and eliminated to maintain the Order.

oaf ago

Sorry, but I only read this one single sentence from the above. Truly. I only read this. I have a habit of scanning the center and then reading something. I read these erroneously claims :

Before, it was hybrids freely happen in Nature. Nature does not permit the survival of man-made manipulations such as hybrids

I explained that we have been talking about DNA. I only care about and talk about DNA, as we are talking about the definition of species. In many different SPECIES, they can mate and reproduce fertile viable offspring, which means that the definition of SPECIES is "something else" and it is... in 2020 it is based on percent of genetic drift. The definition is primarily based on the amount of DNA divergence.

Why are you talking about "Nature", as if "Nature" is a thing? Is "The Order" a thing? This is not a zoology discussion, or a discussion on philosophy.

DNA! We are talking about DNA and the definition of species.

I regret that I have no time to read your off track discussion, as it seems to indicate you are accusing any of my words as being wrong and I never types a single thing incorrectly, just not clear enough for a layperson. You keep misreading, shifting narrative, and worse.. you keep introducing unrelated straw men arguments.

I can summarize it all up again for you.

A SPECIES in 2020 is a different SPECIES if two example animals cannot breed a viable fertile offspring.

OR:

A SPECIES in 2020 is a different SPECIES if two example animals CAN breed a viable fertile offspring, but each animals DNA has drifted genetically for 120,000 years or more (BEAR SPECIES, GORILLA SPECIES, WOLF SPECIES).

See? Simple.

I even prior wrote verbatim this sentence you keep trying to argue with :

"Gorilla SPECIES, Bear SPECIES, Wolf SPECIES, all freely interbreed with little problems and also are different from DNA DRIFT DISTANCE half as long as The Negro."

Rewrite that in your mind as : "The DNA of Gorilla SPECIES, Bear SPECIES, Wolf SPECIES, all EASILY interbreed with little problems and also are different from DNA DRIFT DISTANCE half as long as The Negro"

WI am only talking about DNA and Species.

The Negro is a different Species, unless all wolves become renamed one species, like the domestic dog breeds are one species. Since they are temed species, not subspecies, then there is an anomaly. The anomaly is that if we still permit the useful definition of 120,000 year divergent animals like Gorilla SPECIES, Bear SPECIES, Wolf SPECIES, then we have to obviously also put 350,000 year proven divergent Negros in a different SPECIES.

350,000 is far far more divergence than 120,000 years!!!

I feel somehow you are religious and clutching at a religious text to defend false views on science.

Science is not based on feelings, or political correctness.

1stResponder ago

"Why are you talking about "Nature", as if "Nature" is a thing? Is "The Order" a thing? This is not a zoology discussion, or a discussion on philosophy."

You prove my point. When I talk about the immutable Laws of Nature, you don't know what I'm talking about. The Order is the result of Nature's Laws governing ALL living creatures. Obviously, DNA is a part of that. It's sad so many people are so urbanite that they only recognize concrete and asphalt in their world. Heaven help all those when the electricity goes out.

Your Neanderthal = Humans thesis is dubious and quite a leap in conclusion. I pointed out that your "humans intermixed with Neanderthals" is also dubious. It violates the governing rule of hybrid inviability. The sum of traits of a hybrid are ALWAYS inferior to the overall traits of the parents. Again, this is DNA. By the way, you weren't originally talking about laboratory work here in a petri dish. This however is where you are now taking refuge. Anything chimera can be created in the lab. But, outside of it in the wild, it will not survive.

"In many different SPECIES, they can mate and reproduce fertile viable offspring, which means that the definition of SPECIES is "something else""

Obviously, you are talking about in captivity or in the lab. This is NOT so in the wild (Nature). I've already provided ample examples and reasons why this "bar" can never be overcome for hybrids to survive.

"The Negro is a different Species, unless all wolves become renamed one species, like the domestic dog breeds are one species."

First and foremost, it is unfortunate the cladistic categorization (taxonomy) system of life-forms is man-made (i.e. best polemic of an academic guess). Alas, it is the "best" system we have to go by. It's assembly is not consistent, especially when it come to the categorization of humans. Once again, there is a political factor rearing its ugly head. Taxonomy is in itself a good example on how little we know about the living creatures of Earth. When I was in school there was only two Kingdoms. Now, it is something like 6 Kingdoms. The classification of "race" has been eliminated and renamed "subspecies". Some previous "race" classifications have been moved to "Varieties" and vice-versa to subspecies. It is what it is. When you speak of "Negroes", I believe you are referring to Congolese in general. The differences of "racial" traits of humans are far wider than those found in the species of apes. From this perspective, there should be classified different species of humans. The Khoi and the San of southern Africa are so genetically different than northern Europeans, it has been documented that miscarriages frequently occur and when there is offspring, they either die or are found to be sterile.

oaf ago

This is NOT so in the wild (Nature).

Not true. There are photographs of documented proof of different species mating in the wild, as well as DNA evidence. One example is a Grizzly Bear mating with a Polar Bear (grolar bear, polar grizz, polizzle, pizzly bear) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grizzly%E2%80%93polar_bear_hybrid

Your claim is Not true.

1stResponder ago

Again, these are aberrations. They are not the norm or ever would be. I've already provided you with an example of mule deer/White-tailed deer hybrids. And, how they are easy prey to mountain lions and wolves. Hybrids will ALWAYS be eliminated by a myriad of Nature's methods. There would be no species if hybridity was the governing rule, but it is not and quite the opposite. I also provided further proof that hybridity is confined and restricted in Nature in which every aberration is eliminated. This is what I previously mentioned is called a "hybrid zone". It is a narrow region in which genetically distinct populations come into contact and produce at least some offspring of mixed ancestry. The hybrid zone is a hybrid sink. A hybrid sink is characterized by a reduction of population density caused by reduced fitness of hybrids. In otherwise, hybrid inviability is at work and the elimination of each aberration is under way.

I'm very aware of the grizzly/polar bear hybrid you mention. If I recall correctly, it was a specimen that was shot. It is indeed an aberration. The grizzly and polar bear are wired to be very different in terms of behavioral traits and phenotype. It's very possible that this hybrid was sterile. If not, then it had a very high probability of never finding a mate. If it couldn't find a mate, there's a high probability the hybrid would otherwise succumb to disease as a result of cellular inflammation (microchimerism) and disease. Hybridity affects the chemical balance of the brain. Perhaps, the reason the bear was shot because of its odd and aggressive behavior. Which "fight-or-flight" instinct did have? If any at all? Earlier, I provided info on mulattoes of suffering from a multiple of different congenital diseases. Mulattoes have a much higher rate of mental diseases, including schizophrenia, bipolarism, and more.

"Science proved beyond any doubt that Neanderthal DNA , lots of it, is in all modern Human DNA, using sequencing analysis of both species."

I've read the links you provided and more. My conclusion is different. Just like the "proved beyond any doubt" global warming narrative, I am stating the Neanderthal/human hybrid is a narrative for keeping you from knowing your true origin. The only mutations providing increased intelligence, superior ability, skill, or strength is found in the Marvel Comics.

PizzaGate-Is-Real ago

Thank you for the link, that's extremely interesting.

I question how feasible that is across the spectrum of living things as a whole because sequencing all living things is a massive and almost impossible endeavor, but I imagine it's within the realm of possibility for mammals and humans specifically.

I guess similar could be said of the current reproductive isolation classification method as well.

oaf ago

Its mostly happening. In fact this is and exact quote taken verbatim from that 2009 paper I cited above :

DNA sequencing of whole genomes for multiple species is becoming less expensive, easier, and faster (Chan 2005; Zwick 2005), and such technological advances will result in a new research landscape for the interface of genetic information and studies on mammalian systematics, biodiversity, speciation, and so on. As a result, genetic profiles will soon be generated for many, if not most, mammalian species.

it also mentions , you only need to do it 5,000 times for 5,000 assumed known mammal species.

But true... there are many many other animals than mammals.

At least it will result in cleaning up the big mess of "what is a species or not"

The resistance is like the "planet pluto" resistance. And It is the unmentionable issue of African Negroid Hominids being well proven different species than "Homo Sapien sapiens"

PizzaGate-Is-Real ago

I understand your sentiment, but that does not fit the rational definition of what a biological species is:

the major subdivision of a genus or subgenus, regarded as the basic category of biological classification, composed of related individuals that resemble one another, are able to breed among themselves, but are not able to breed with members of another species.

tokui ago

No, different species can interbreed. Like niggers and europeans.

1stResponder ago

Hybridity is very rare in Nature. It's occurrence is always eliminated, if not immediately, time will eliminate it. Nature's order is indeed immutable.

oaf ago

WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!

read all of this first :

https://voat.co/v/science/3621619/22226452

1stResponder ago

Hmmmmm, It's strange that there are 30 subspecies of White-tailed deer and that they most definitely do not interbreed "freely" as you claim. Otherwise, there would no longer be 30 subspecies. Even at this cladistic level, optimal balance will dictate avoidance to inbreeding. It is hard-wired into the survival instinct of all creatures. When such uncommon aberrations do occur, the overwhelming odds are greatly opposed to the hybrids survival. This is exponentially magnified as the clade diverges.

In stating that species "freely interbreed" so erroneous and ridiculous, that you are pushing camel shit as good reefer.

As I stated before, hybridity almost always occurs in captivity. Human encroachment can also cause extreme stress in animal where behavior is altered. It is similar in psychological terms as insanity that derails a species unique instinctual instructions for maintaining optimal balance. Some, if not all the cases you mentioned, are a result of human-induced stress instances of hybrids. There is even something known as "hybrid zones" that are fickle, always restricted, and never contaminate the overall immutable order of the two parent species.

oaf ago

subspecies?

We are only in this entire thread discussing SPECIES, not subspecies.

You totally are misunderstanding my words and totally implying wrong things, I meant the DNA, the sperm and egg, can freely interbreed, and they can. You can not only see it in nature, but a scientist can force different species of bears to breed viable offspring. SPECIES not mere subspecies.

A scientist can force different species of WOLVES to breed viable offspring. SPECIES not mere subspecies.

A scientist can force different species of GORILLA to breed viable offspring. SPECIES not mere subspecies.

If the animals refuse, sperm can be introduced, but they wont refuse typically.

When I wrote "freely", I meant over 50% viable outcomes when interbred. Not that they can fly through the on their own across rivers lake and mountains. Why would you think I claim THAT? That's crazy. The entire posts of mine concern one thing : DNA. We are talikng about DNA, not animals flying across mountains on their own to complete or facilitate reproduction experiments.

I wrote this verbatim :

Gorilla SPECIES, Bear SPECIES, Wolf SPECIES, all freely interbreed with little problems and also are different from DNA DRIFT DISTANCE half as long as The Negro.

I meant that mankind can induce them to freely interbreed with little problems obviously. We know polar bears live far away from some other bears being discussed. Mankind can induce their DNA to freely interbreed.

Gorilla SPECIES, Bear SPECIES, Wolf SPECIES all perfectly interbreed and I gave you links to some outcomes with photos of Pizzly Bears, Growler Bears, etc.

They are different species soley because of the DNA genetic "distance". Originally their were over 70 brown bear SPECIES, now, this decade there is only one brown bear species, because of DNA rules.

1stResponder ago

"We are only in this entire thread discussing SPECIES, not subspecies."

I was demonstrating that even on a more similar cladistic level (ergo, subspecies), hybridity is NEVER the rule. Rather, Nature treats it as an aberration is then eliminated. It is even more improbable at the species level.

"I meant the DNA, the sperm and egg, can freely interbreed, and they can."

Here you ignore the very specific survival strategy (instinct) that is hard-wired and unique to every species. Ergo, it ALWAYS dictates mating with its own kind. This is the quintessential "program" that optimal balance not only maintains, but strive to fine tunes. Such behavioral traits as mating rituals, plume, color, color brightness, mating calls (magnitude, tone, etc.), antler shape, size, scent, strength, etc. ALL dictate whether an animal gets to mate and reproduce. This is only ONE factor of so many others dictating whether there is success to mating. Hybrids rarely make it to this point. By then, they are eliminated either by suffering congenital diseases as a result of a brewing cytokine storm and inflammation due to microchimerism or its survival instinct has been completely derailed at the gene level. Thus, the hybrid becomes easy prey for carnivores. Nature's design is inclusive of hybrid inviability.

"A scientist can force different species of WOLVES to breed viable offspring."

Yes, you have just made my point for me. Almost ALL hybrids are created in captivity. Again, captivity causes great stress to animals, especially during mating season. Their natural habitat is gone. Their mating ritual is gone. Natural selection and competition is gone. The captive animal is not behaving as it would in the wild. As long as its not in its natural habitat, it can be considered insane. An example of this is a hybrid elephant was born from captive African and Indian elephants sharing the same pen. I think the level of incompetence of the people responsible for the shared pen demonstrates, how utterly ignorant they are. Even domesticated dogs in a confined space will hump a human's leg if allowed. Otherwise, if the do is free to roam, it would soon dart off into a sojourn finding another dog to mate with. As a note, these elephants are not separate species though, but rather are cladistically far more distant at the Genus level. The hybrid elephant offspring did not survive.

Anthropogenic (man-made) manipulation of species is contrary to Nature's Laws. Even domesticated animals are inferior to its feral counterpart. Studies show domestication actually results in smaller brain size compared to its feral counterpart, along with other oddities. In reality, domesticated animals like dogs and cats are actually similar to Down Syndrome victims.

"I meant that mankind can induce them to freely interbreed with little problems obviously. We know polar bears live far away from some other bears being discussed. Mankind can induce their DNA to freely interbreed."

You are changing your narrative to "mankind can induce their DNA to freely interbreed." Before, it was hybrids freely happen in Nature. Nature does not permit the survival of man-made manipulations such as hybrids. An example is of this is domesticated corn. Essentially, all of it is hybrid corn. In Nature, hybrid corn would succumb to extinction within a few generations. Only under mankind's direct cultivation and care do hybrids exist. The vast majority of human activity is contrary to Nature's Laws. It does not have to be like this. Ask Paul Gautschi​ of "Back to Eden" fame, or Viktor Schauberger, one of the most important scientists of the 20th Century that are never mentioned. In my posts I have focused on the Nature's Laws, something that 99% of people have little to no knowledge of. Yet, I haven't mentioned the "Eternal Laws", which Viktor Schauberger, Nichola Tesla, and John Searl understood so well. They are the basis for Nature's Laws.

"Originally there were over 70 brown bear SPECIES, now, this decade there is only one brown bear species, because of DNA drift rules of ~120,000 years in mammals."

There was also the short-faced bear. It is also extinct. The number of species of brown bears could be much higher. I'm assuming these are the known species from the fossil record. You are leaving out a large factor of extinction due to catastrophism. 12,600 years ago a series of comet strikes caused mass extinctions. This is well-documented by Graham Hancock and others. Unfortunately, the fossil record is a poor indicator of any species. It represents a small percentage of what may have been. It takes a very specific set of circumstances for a skeletal remain to fossilize and be preserved. This is why for example, there is no fossil record of great apes like the chimpanzee and gorilla. Also, the panda bear was thought to be a myth (to Westerners) and it wasn't until the 1930s that such a "plant-eating bear" was finally observed in the wild.

Genetic drift and mutations, in addition to the 120,000 years estimate, is a narrative for us to believe. Nature tells us otherwise. These highly funded studies are distractions preventing us from knowing our true origins. Evolution is based on a plagiarized interpretation of Genesis. The chronology is identical to Genesis. Although, Charles Robert Darwin contributions borrowed heavily from Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and others, perhaps it was the new era that gave breath to his views. Darwins views radically changed the debate about the species of animals. In Darwin's time, there was a great scientific debate between monogensism and polygenesism. Darwin originally sided with polygenesists, but changed his tune when criticism from the Church became perilous.

The Church supported monogenesism as long as it explained the races and species from the time of the so-called “world” flood. However, it was this very dogma that permitted the unexpected rise of Darwin. In a sense, Christian orthodoxy had opened a Pandora’s box. Darwin in his “On the Origin of Species" certainly had his detractors besides the Church, as we shall soon learn. The Church opposed polygenesism because it didn’t agree with their unity of mankind view of the Scriptures.

The vast majority of creationists and evolutionists are monogenesists. That is, they believe mankind sprang from primordial parents or a pair. It is here that the “unity of man” and “brotherhood of man” doctrine is easily promoted. It is here the “unity of man” prepares the way for when it is said, “there are no races.” It is interesting this narrative was supported by Harold Wallace Rosenthal, who was an important aid to Senator Javits of New York. Javits is credited to have "single-handedly" pushed through the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act that changed United States forever. Rosenthal bragged that the Jews have established 5 major falsehoods which work to conceal their nature and protect their status and power and to deceive the goyim. One of these is - "that all people are equal". The alternative narrative - “there are no races” is an intricate part of their falsehood. Some other quotes verifying this are:

“The term ‘races’ is really not applicable to humans since there is only one race – the human race. . . . The Biblical account tells us that we are all descended from Adam and Eve and from Noah and Mrs. Noah. Consequently, we are all cousins.” (Brown, Walter T., “In the Beginning”, Center for Scientific Creationism, 4th Ed. 1986 pp. 51-52.)

"The "plan is dedicated to the unification of all races, religions and creeds. This plan, dedicated to the new order of things, is to make all things new a new nation, a new race, a new civilization, and a new religion, a non-sectarian religion that has already been recognized and called the religion of 'The Great Light . . . The Great God our king has chosen the great American Public Schools to pave the way for the new race, the new religion, and the new civilization.... " (Griffin, Karen, “Is Belief In A Planned One World Government ‘Far Fetched Paranoia’?” Midnight Messenger, Issue #61, May-June, 1995. From C. William Smith, "God's Plan in America", in the top Masonic (Scottish Rite) publication, New Age magazine, September 1950.)

Evolution relies on what you are reporting. Have you noticed even to this day the hostility toward anything promoting polygenesism though? I wonder why? Maybe Darwin himself can answer this. There is no sustainable genetic drift. It's contrary to Nature's Laws. It's contrary to the Eternal Laws. My definition of Eternal Law is different than Aquinas'. Rather, it involves the Golden Ratio and Fibonacci's spiral. This is demonstrated remarkably through Viktor Schauberger's work and is repeated everywhere throughout the universe.

PizzaGate-Is-Real ago

I read it.

The entire argument is premised on "DNA drift distance of under 120,000 years", for which no source is provided.

There do not seem to be any readily available references on this in search engines either.

Where is a source or reference on this claim?

Holonomic ago

He also got it from reddit, or he's spamming it from elsewhere.

oaf ago

@Holonomic is 100% backward wrong!

@Holonomic erroneously located someone borrowing my own 100% created words and reddit user/Infearmal , whom is VERY similar in mental spirit to me, pasted it on Reddit and user/Infearmal said SPECIFICALLY in the top that user/Infearmal DID NOT AUTHOR it but rather I did. Read this line from user/Infearmal :

Ok pal. I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet commenting about this meme. Thanksfully someone has found your whinny hideout and linked to this page. We're not even talking about being subhumans anymore.

That user on reddit copying my works wrote :

"I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet"

That "someone else" is me, from NOT on reddit. @Holonomic cannot read a whole post.

I have no active reddit account, and only posted 4 times in my past before being banned there for posting statistics on Black welfare in the USA from the Government statistics. I am NOT user/Infearmal.

@Holonomic is trying to be a jew shill because one of his parents is a Negro and being half black or quarter Black, @Holonomic DOES NOT like reading DNA FACTS about Negroes being a provable different SPECIES not SUBSPECIES.

I thought I had to respond. But I am very very happy to see a red pill of mine pasted nearly verbatim onto reddit! I am smiling so much this hour from spotting it on reddit in user comments even if an admin probably deleted it or hid it.

@PizzaGate-Is-Real, the repaster on reddit specifically typed this phrase that caucasians can read and comprehend : "I'm just gonna quote you someone else on the internet", and thus @Holonomic is spreading Jew lie disenchantment and narrative shifting and "attacking the messenger not the message".

TL/DR : @Holonomic is hilariously incorrect, and my works did not originate on reddit.

Holonomic ago

Quit spamming me you fucking nigger fag.

You plagiarize your shit, or copy it and when you get called out you flip your bean like a deranged faggot.

Holonomic ago

Quit spamming me you faggot cocksucker.

You plagiarize your shit, or copy it and when you get called out you flip your bean like a deranged faggot.