Most of you are aware of this but in case some of you do not know, SRS and CTR shills have been in a giant effort on Voat to gain control over the largest trafficked subs (Pizzagate, Identitarian, basically any sub with conservatives and redpills) and have been successful in it. Not only did it work for the most part, now the SRS shills are openly bragging about it
Notice all the buzzwords OP uses to try and seem like they are on of us. This is the way they are going to try and subvert all conservative communities until 2020. Coordinated attacks and shitposts until it overwhelms subs and they simply leave Voat or hand it over to the shills. If they take action against the shills, they are branded as censors. @OwnYourActions You need to speak up about this and notify your userbase because SRS shills like DietCokehead1 rely on people's laziness to overcome them.
Same thing with PG, Pizzagate has been taken over by ProtectVoat mods and implemented the most strict set of rules out of any subverse on Voat to prevent any meta discussion about pedophiles on Voat and instead want you focusing on pedophiles out of your reach (elite pedophiles)
Voat's community voice was so large 2 years ago that the shills couldn't even attempt these moves, but now after 2 years of harrassment, many original users have vanished and shill tactics are once again gaining traction.
@PeaceSeeker @PuttItOut I urge you to look into this type of manipulation.
Posting to subverses like Identitarian isn't supposed to be a pissing contest, it's supposed to be educational and realistic. All the new sub will do is be a shitposting sub and claim they are speaking for the white nationalist movement.
view the rest of the comments →
XF-Hyperion ago
What does SRS stand for? Is it a person? Some slang for Shareblue?
What's with people confusing stupid users with malicious shills? Reminds me of the "call them a shill" cancer that's killing all discussion on 8ch.
Flour ago
It's an group called /r/shitredditsays, basically a bunch of SJW's who lobbied hard on Reddit to implement the SJW type policing of the site it currently has now
It's just a user trend that can be easily picked up on here since Voat requires accounts and identification, unlike the anon boards over at 8ch and 4ch where you never know who is who without tripcodes. If you spend enough time watching certain user's habits and tendencies for causing disruption and cause you will realize certain power-users on the site are consistently using divide and conquer tactics in order to subvert subvers ownership in order to gain control of it for themselves.
XF-Hyperion ago
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I really appreciate it.
Ah, so that's where that factual facon character comes from.
I think I understand. Would you agree that pretty much 100% of the accusations posted on the /v/anon and /v/anontalk boards are D&C attempts?
freshmeat ago
Correct. The shills have been hiding behind Anon because they are power-users here and don't want the community to recognize them.
XF-Hyperion ago
I'm glad we agree. I've noticed in another comment you mention something about "quality discussion on /v/Identitarian" (something like that); Could you clarify this opinion? As an example, I am in favor of deporting Jews from the USA, but recognize that extermination is a legitimate choice worthy of discussion. Would you consider pro-genocide discussions to be inherently "low-quality?" Unfortunately I just use /v/all so different subverse/mod behaviors don't catch my attention very easily.
freshmeat ago
I don't speak for Identitarian and my participation is casual, but I would assume all conversations regarding who is holding down whites and what should be done about it should be legitimate. But considering some of the audience that sub has (literally Jared Taylor) I think shit posting about gassing kikes is probably unnecessary. What admins have made clear on this website is that it's up to a sub's mods and community to operate how they see fit.
XF-Hyperion ago
I agree, that's more appropriate on /v/JuiceTown (or similar).
Thanks for the civil conversation