You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

XF-Hyperion ago

  1. What does SRS stand for? Is it a person? Some slang for Shareblue?

  2. What's with people confusing stupid users with malicious shills? Reminds me of the "call them a shill" cancer that's killing all discussion on 8ch.

Flour ago

What does SRS stand for? Is it a person? Some slang for Shareblue?

It's an group called /r/shitredditsays, basically a bunch of SJW's who lobbied hard on Reddit to implement the SJW type policing of the site it currently has now

What's with people confusing stupid users with malicious shills? Reminds me of the "call them a shill" cancer that's killing all discussion on 8ch.

It's just a user trend that can be easily picked up on here since Voat requires accounts and identification, unlike the anon boards over at 8ch and 4ch where you never know who is who without tripcodes. If you spend enough time watching certain user's habits and tendencies for causing disruption and cause you will realize certain power-users on the site are consistently using divide and conquer tactics in order to subvert subvers ownership in order to gain control of it for themselves.

XF-Hyperion ago

Thanks for taking the time to reply. I really appreciate it.

It's an group called /r/shitredditsays

Ah, so that's where that factual facon character comes from.

you will realize certain power-users on the site are consistently using divide and conquer tactics

I think I understand. Would you agree that pretty much 100% of the accusations posted on the /v/anon and /v/anontalk boards are D&C attempts?

freshmeat ago

I think I understand. Would you agree that pretty much 100% of the accusations posted on the /v/anon and /v/anontalk boards are D&C attempts?

Correct. The shills have been hiding behind Anon because they are power-users here and don't want the community to recognize them.

XF-Hyperion ago

I'm glad we agree. I've noticed in another comment you mention something about "quality discussion on /v/Identitarian" (something like that); Could you clarify this opinion? As an example, I am in favor of deporting Jews from the USA, but recognize that extermination is a legitimate choice worthy of discussion. Would you consider pro-genocide discussions to be inherently "low-quality?" Unfortunately I just use /v/all so different subverse/mod behaviors don't catch my attention very easily.

freshmeat ago

I don't speak for Identitarian and my participation is casual, but I would assume all conversations regarding who is holding down whites and what should be done about it should be legitimate. But considering some of the audience that sub has (literally Jared Taylor) I think shit posting about gassing kikes is probably unnecessary. What admins have made clear on this website is that it's up to a sub's mods and community to operate how they see fit.

XF-Hyperion ago

I think shit posting about gassing kikes is probably unnecessary.

I agree, that's more appropriate on /v/JuiceTown (or similar).

Thanks for the civil conversation