https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2309642
This thread by @srayzie got deleted by MF.
Relates directly to previous leads regarding the Haiti earthquake.
I studied microbiology in college. I can independantly verfiy that the claims in the linked thread are plausible.
How: The root cause of death in Cholera infections is dehydration. Organ damage is extremely rare.
Why: Cholera would also serve as the perfect method by which to cover up an organ harvesting operation. It would be really easy to shake off suspiscion if the murder weapon and the cover up are one and the same. No one would suspect it for people would be naturally be inclined to believe a disease epidemic was the cause of all the deaths of those who were subsequently targeted for organ harvesting.
@2impendingdoom you were curious regarding the timing of the Honduras cholera epidemic and one of Hillary's emails. Was there by chance a disaster before this?
@River_Otter you mentioned something about an epidemic in Yemen. Any recent crisis of any sort there in the months before hand?
view the rest of the comments →
4_InquiringMinds ago
And @Vindicator while we are at it...you know the speculation thingy...
Resident nut case Rosanne tweets Qanon is Bill Hicks...again twatter the bastion of sourced claims right?
Instead of removing that submission you reply with this...
You gave it a flair, how nice.
Pat answers like you just gave re srayzie's excellent post are not enough. If that is all you have then you are not naive...you are um, something more. We just need to get really clear on who's who and who is really for the children.
Then again you could run and hide :)
Vindicator ago
Look, 4, my preference is to leave up anything I can and let the voats decide, using flairs to mitigate posts being used against this investigation. MF just removes. The only claim being made by that Roseanne tweet thread was that Roseanne tweeted it. That was sourced. Srayzie's thread had multiple claims which were not sourced, either by her or the article she quoted.
Shareblue "mods are compromised" talking point -- confirmed.
4_InquiringMinds ago
@srayzie post was removed by MF rule 1
PG has posts up discussing julian's twitter, trump and rothchilds fortune, roseanne tweets, person identified trump dossier, Q on weiner
Where is the relevance per rule 1? If rule 1 is to be applied evenly then there are a plethora of posts that should be removed. Rule 1 is used by MF to remove anything he wants. When asked for an explanation...nada. You can say...
shareblue till you are blue in the face/it does not change what is happening. Either the rules apply to ALL or something needs to change. Compromised definitely. Are you part of it/remains to be seen.
There are members here that do impressive research. They deserve to be treated with respect/they are not. This is not a Q forum. srayzie takes her Q interest to the Q sub/where it belongs. Unless a Q post can directly relate per rule 1 it should be removed. If it does relate to rule 1 should be flared speculation.
For those fixated on roseanne's latest tweets they should make a tweetwatch sub.
I'm on the fence about you vindicator...but if you are really you this is what you have happening on pg. Many intelligent dedicated researchers have left. The depth of most posting is juvenile at best. The sub is littered with lots of one line topics. PG looks more like the daily scandal sheet than any indepth research. It went from researching to a daily news feed/taking the daily news from just any ol' place/many that publish for clicks.
You can say shareblue all you want (which gives me pause just what you are really about) or acknowledge what is happening to the sub. If it is not clear...there is little to none real research going on and when someone posts something of quality, something that could really lead to 'more' MF removes it. If you can't see that you are naive/or doing diversion/dunno.
The members here that put time and considerable effort into research are treated like they are some unruly children that need to be brought into line while others that post really stupid stuff are given a free reign. I mean honestly, have you not noticed the degradation of the posts? How could you not? Tell me how a twitter rant has anything AT ALL ABOUT HELPING THE CHILDREN????? Tell me please.
And if the sub is not about helping the children...who by the way languish in cages waiting to be tortured while ppl masturbate over the latest Q or twat or trump/then what is the purpose of the sub?
@ESOTERICshade, @carmencita, @AngB23, @NoBS, @darkknight111
NoBS ago
You have lost sight of the objective. The children are being raped because "most" well mean citizens are in denial. Your heavy handed approach is burning bridges and helping the clueless remain ignorant. By censorship which controls the narrative.
Think long term and get the fuck off that high horse, and help the newbies take BABY steps.