@kevdude @Vindicator @VictorSteinerDavion
Post in question
@Millennial_Falcon cited rule 3 for removal, so I'm going to operate as if that's the litmus test here.
All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.
All the title does is list 4 things, one being pizzagate. It insinuates a link, but does not say for sure, or how, or through what new source or info.
Still, possibly acceptable on its own merits if we take the insinuation into account.
EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post
I rest my case.
view the rest of the comments →
ESOTERICshade ago
Join the club bro, tons of people have left because of this. More are leaving every week.
Crensch ago
"This" what?
ESOTERICshade ago
He is insinuating himself and his opinion into the research topics. Its all in the deleted thread. This was a brilliant thread, to say the least. It takes a brilliant mind to make all these types of connections. This is just one of hundreds he has deleted and the best researchers the sub ever had have left over it.
Matter of fact @swordfish69 and @letsdothis1 are the only two left I can think of right now. There used to be dozens.
Planned Parenthood works with pimps that sex traffic children. They run the trafficked children through Planned Parenthood and sell the fetal tissue products. The pizzagate community wants a light shone on it and Falcon thwarts it as "abortion politics."
He is the one making it political, not us. All we care about is the fact that sex trafficked children are being used to prop up the fetal tissue sales as a closed loop system. Groom child sex slaves, harvest their fetuses, rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat.....
Falcon says "yes but they make medical treatments for stem cells and help people with it too." Maybe so but we don't care what he thinks. We don't hear his philosophy, or his politics. We just want to be allowed to go where the facts lead us. Period.
That is just ONE of the brilliant associations that were connected to Marina Abromavic, Welcome Trust, Democrats, Podesta, and a whole host of complicated connections.
We don't feel that its his job to give us his opinion and philosophy about our findings. He does not have to like it. We don't like where it leads us either but we go there to shine a light on it.
You guys can defend him all day long and it won't solve anything at this point because the posting community has no faith left in him at all. It expired. To put it bluntly we want him gone.
This place is a shadow of its former self and in my opinion it is because he has driven off the best pizzagate minds and researchers in the business. We can argue about that all day, or not, but the fact is that the sub has suffered and will continue to do so. This aint' rocket science. Just my opinion but I want for this sub to cut its losses with this mod.
He has a history of banning people like me and i'm one of the few that will speak because I don't care if he bans me or not. I just want decent moderation and he is not it.
If it has come down to the point that we have to fight him over research this good because of his opinions then we are all just spinning in the mud. It does not have to be this hard, he makes it this hard.
I'm sick of this so bad I don't even check this sub and read it like I used to, like a lot of other people.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2390929
@kevdude @vindicator @swordfish69 @think- @letsdothis1
Crensch ago
No, it wasn't.
letsdothis1 ago
I've just seen my report card. I agree that sometimes I didn't make some connecting sentences with this post because I had so much information and was pressed for time. Some people did understand what I was getting at but those would be the ones who have been here a while and already have some background knowledge.
I don't really understand the need to delete without giving someone the opportunity to clarify certain bits when clearly the post contains much information, but as Esoteric says, it's your subverse.
If this platform was truly evolving over time we shouldn't have to constantly create posts for people who have zilch knowledge of our research here i.e. pander to the lowest common denominator. To be honest, I'm surprised this forum has lasted as long as it has here.
I see now you are suggesting a poll. Now where have I seen that before ? Hmm... now let me think....
Vindicator ago
The only problem with this point is that material that is overly dense and full of obscure references isn't helpful for people to share with their friends and family. We need both muscular research AND readability. Plus, we have a group of folks who are paid to spam the board with dense, obscurely referenced nutty material to spread disinfo and delegitimize real researchers. To remove those posts, we have to have the ruleset, which means everyone is subject to it.
Crensch ago
Well said, sir. Very well said.