@kevdude @Vindicator @VictorSteinerDavion
Post in question
@Millennial_Falcon cited rule 3 for removal, so I'm going to operate as if that's the litmus test here.
All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.
All the title does is list 4 things, one being pizzagate. It insinuates a link, but does not say for sure, or how, or through what new source or info.
Still, possibly acceptable on its own merits if we take the insinuation into account.
EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post
I rest my case.
view the rest of the comments →
ESOTERICshade ago
I actually think the rules are pretty good. I think its the interpreter of the rules that is the problem. The lead mod does not fit in. I think its that simple. If that does not solve it then maybe tinker with the rules? But the rules actually look decent to me. And to be honest with you I don't know if there are enough interested parties left in the sub to have a rules discussion that would be very meaningful, its that bad.
heygeorge ago
Do you know where to find other 'interested parties' and see if they'd be interested in coming back for a new rules/moderation discussion?
ESOTERICshade ago
I'm still in touch with some but most I don't know how to contact. Some went to steemit and youtube and I might be able to find some of those, but some I would not be able to find because I don't know what their steemit names are. But honestly, no shit, I don't think they care enough to get involved with the situation with the same board owners and mods here. Hell, i'm so burned out on it I am not even sure I would go through it. I mean, look what happened in this thread. Same bullshit of "i am always right, you are always wrong, fuck you we don't care what you think, and fuck off to Redditt." Nobody wants to tolerate that, including me. If there is a discussion on the rules what incentive do I have to even participate with these same people here? They don't give a damn what anybody thinks and they said so many times in this thread. We can discuss until the cows come home and they will just do the same shit.
heygeorge ago
Some of what you're referring to is what I think of as... Crensch being Crensch. You're referring to plurality of people, but in reality are talking about one user.
I think a rules thread has been started.
ESOTERICshade ago
Unacceptable.
Not for me. That is just @crensch bait.