Reading through this thread on the Franklin Scandal, I came across a comment on Michael Aquino which contained a link to an archived wikipedia thread http://web.archive.org/web/20021019120146/http://www.geocities.com/lord_visionary/satanic_subversion.htm .
Aquino was deeply involved in what has been called the "revolution in military affairs" ("RMA"), the introduction of the most kooky "Third Wave," "New Age" ideas into military long-range planning, which introduced such notions as "information warfare" and "cyber-warfare" into the Pentagon's lexicon.
In the early 1980s, at the same time that Heidi and Alvin Toffler were spinning their Tavistock "Third Wave" utopian claptrap to some top Air Force brass, Aquino and another U.S. Army colonel, Paul Vallely, were co-authoring an article for Military Review. Although the article was never published in the journal, the piece was widely circulated among military planners, and was distributed by Aquino's Temple of Set. The article, titled "From PSYOP to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory," endorsed some of the ideas published in a 1980 Military Review article by Lt. Col. John Alexander, an affiliate of the Stanford Research Institute, a hotbed of Tavistock Institute and Frankfurt School "New Age" social engineering.
Revolution in Military Affairs
The military concept of Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) is a military-theoretical hypothesis, ...especially tied to modern information, communications, and space technology, RMA is often linked to current discussions under the label of Transformation and total systems integration in the U.S. military.
From the Information Warfare site, The Revolution in Military Affairs
In conclusion, even if the European NATO nations develop their own revolutions in military affairs - and it is desirable that they do so - and they succeed in achieving a certain form of integration in the European defence industry, they will always have to rely on US high technologies, especially in the field of "information dominance". Obviously, it is in the interest of the United States themselves to share part of these defence systems and technologies in order to fill the gap with their allies and maintain the problems of interoperability at a manageable level.
U.S. Army Cyber Command (ARCYBER) is the Army service component command[1] supporting U.S. Cyber Command, for information dominance of cyberspace operations. The numerical command for Army Cyber is Second Army.
Further links:
780th Military Intelligence Brigade
9th Army Signal Command
NETCOM - U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command
Fort Huachuca
The 111th Military Intelligence Brigade
The MI Corps will move into the information age and develop the high-technology soldier required in the 21st century. This will happen in several areas. The first is interactive training. Comparable to a flight simulator, this type of training will allow the soldier to use the same cognitive thought process in the training environment as will be used in combat.
...developing...
view the rest of the comments →
cantsleepawink ago
University of Arizona, A Stronger Plan for a Strong Future .
Defense and Security Research (Pg 19):
UA Financial Report 2016 : http://www.fso.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/fm/reports/cafr2016.pdf
new4now ago
is this why all of The McCain Institute's money goes to Arizona University?
https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/4pnojf0tds55o2oi/images/11-94957d55e8.jpg