RT #spiritcooking w/ #NeveryHillary Y #DrainTheSwamp - NYPD Ready 2 Make Arrests in Weiner Case bit.ly/2fjmNnM via @BreitbartNews
The tweet.
Q drops I've found with standalone "Y":
https://qmap.pub/read/128
Find the ke[y]stone.
https://qmap.pub/read/142
How did Soros replace family ‘y’?
Who is family ‘y’?
https://qmap.pub/read/184
Follow the Owl & Y head around the world.
https://qmap.pub/read/185
1507085298730.jpg
Links to: https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1507085298730.jpg, confirming this is a picture of the aforementioned "Y head"
https://qmap.pub/read/189
Identify symbolism (Owl / Y).
Which performers/celebs supported HRC during the election?
Who performed during her rallies?
What jewelry and/or tattoos present?
What other events do they attend together?
What does HRC represent to them?
What celebrities have owl / Y head symbols?
What politicians have owl / Y head symbols?
What powerful people have owl / Y head symbols?
What powerful groups have owl / Y head symbols?
https://qmap.pub/read/192
Why are China & Russia communist S/closed?
Can you find an owl / Y there?
https://qmap.pub/read/194
Re-read drops re: NK / Iran.
(Y) What does it mean to be covered in gold?
Which couple was photographed covered in gold?
and
Who has all the information?
(Y) What does it mean to be covered in gold?
Can you locate one other pic w/ Y head covered in gold?
https://qmap.pub/read/195
A dupe of the link above. Possibly meaningful.
https://qmap.pub/read/780
In an effort to preserve the integrity of all U.S. elections, as ordered by the President of the United States, after an extensive investigation in select counties (the ‘sampling’), the DHS has concluded that while Russian entities (as outlined within SC Mueller’s investigation were complicit in attempting to undermine the presidential election of 2016) had no direct impact or bearing on the outcome of the presidential election, nor were any U.S. person(s) knowingly part of such an attempt to sabotage as it relates to the Russian investigation, U.S. and other foreign entities (as further described within DHS[XXXX]), acting outside of Russian agents, did attempt on numerous occasions, and were successful, in interfering w/ the presidential election of 2016, senate elections of [x, y, z], [x] elections, whereby several million of illegal, non-resident ballots (the “irregularities”) were counted, while legal ballots were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled. We believe these actions were a coordinated attack against the democracy of our country.
It's a stretch, but they might not be just innocent variables.
https://qmap.pub/read/963
Stage_5:5[y]
https://qmap.pub/read/2043
P talks to X
X talks to Y
Y talks to Z
Maybe not so much of a stretch. "P" is an odd variable to pair with X Y and Z.
https://qmap.pub/read/2510
Come[y] timestamp re: attorney challenge to
https://qmap.pub/read/2562
COME[Y]
https://qmap.pub/read/3599
A Higher Loyalty [Y].
.
Fancy that, the guy bringing you news on PIZZAGATE arrests happens to use a standalone "Y" just like Q ANON does. I bet that really burns the asses of some certain shills here.
Rules checklist:
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities.
Literally. Fucking. Arrests. Does anyone doubt arrests based on Anthony Weiner's case has nothing to do with PG?
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link.
Title's first factual claim has a link in the body of the submission to the tweet, verifying my claim that he tweeted it as factual. Title's second factual claim of Q ANON using a standalone "Y" recently and many times was taken care of with every other link/quote/explanation.
2: If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources.
I didn't.
2: If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them.
No opinions or arguments. Factual claims only.
2: Avoid baseless speculation.
None to be found.
2: ALL posts must include at least one link.
Multiple links.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.
I cannot think of a more succinct explanation title, and Anthony Weiner should be a household name here by now.
3: EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
I do believe no case could be made that this did not happen.
4, 5, and 6, are not applicable. This is not Meta, it is not NSFW, and is not a link post.
view the rest of the comments →
ESOTERICshade ago
The Flynn tweet and Breitbart article are 3 years old. What is the point in posting it three years later?
Crensch ago
Oh, hey! It's the guy that pretends to be friends with real researchers, then doxxes them off the site! He does this when he's not manufacturing consensus and vote-manipulating with his alts.
It was linked by Q again, and I noticed the loose "Y" that would look like a typo to an idiot kike shill like you.
ESOTERICshade ago
Prove that I doxed somebody. You can't. I had more personal info about srayzie than anybody at Voat, and just like I promised her, I kept it to myself, in spite of what she did to me.
You still have not explained how Coleman Rogers (pamphletanon) from the Patriot Soapbox got caught using the Q trip code but he still is not Qanon.
Delusional and vindictive, per usual.
Crensch ago
Dishonest person that lies constantly and is caught manipulating votes and consensus-cracking, playing both sides of arguments and attacks PSYOP style against users with his KNOWN alts wants PROOF that he doxed, despite him knowing that furnishing such proof would get ME banned.
Kek.
I don't have to.
I have evidence of your fuckery on numerous levels. All you have is that I hurt your feefees because you're an overemotional Jewish snowflake.
ESOTERICshade ago
gothamgirl and srayzie were the ones having a doxing contest. I had nothing to do with that.
Crensch ago
Yeah, just info srayzie sent only to you showed up.
Also, other researchers you buddied up to somehow wound up disappearing and/or freaking out before disappearing.
It's ok. Nobody has to believe that part if they don't want. They can believe it's a lie, but I have absolute evidence that you manipulate votes and play both sides of attacking researchers with alts, and playing White Knight hero to them with this username.
ESOTERICshade ago
Wrong again. @gothamgirl dug up her own info. I didn't even know the stuff she posted, but it was interesting none the less.
Crensch ago
No, she got it from you and kevdude.
Gothamgirl ago
No I surely didn't @Generaldouche gave all Srayzies info to @Zyklon. Remember the cunt even wrote an apology for it?
https://voat.co/v/whatever/3322687
It wasn't @Kevindude or @Esotericshade.
Crensch ago
Everyone knows you and cat jumped on the grenades for Kev. Her admitting to giving you information that Kev specifically had and nobody else did doesn't actually make her the one that leaked that information.
Gothamgirl ago
Not true she gave the info to zyklon and I have no idea where she got it. We never really spoke ever probably because she was so thirsty for him, I never liked her.
But I do remember hearing she meet you in real life at some church.
Crensch ago
It doesn't evade my notice that you tried to distract from the main point of the subject by bringing up things that are only 10 chinchilly relevant and really not all that interesting. You try to tell a story of your life in order to distract from the fact that there is absolutely no reason to believe that kat had any information, whereas Kev was part of the mod Circle and she had opened up to him. He was the only one that had some of the information that came out.
Best part is, there is no reason to believe you since you stuck with a pedophile that was threatening to rape and murder her child for over a month. Healthy, well-adjusted, honest people don't do that. Jews and mentally ill sick fucks do.
Gothamgirl ago
Oh fuck off, he isn't a pedo he is just a scumbag troll.
I can't say where Kat got the info from, I can only say she passed it on to zyklon, who gave it to me.
Why are you deflecting from your meet up with that fat turd Kat?
I am not healthy and never hide that.
All of this bullshit made me have a heart attack.
I do not have any type of mental illness and I am definitely not a Jew. Only Jews keep repeating the word subhuman repetitively, such as yourself. I have no religion, gave it up after Catholics had their first Pedo scandal. I only believe in God the Almighty.
Crensch ago
I'm not deflecting anything. I never met her and it sounded like something you just pulled out of your ass to distract from the fact that you showed up once again to defend Kev.
Then why do you show up to defend him every time I bring up the fact that he was the only one with that information?
I've never seen a Jew use the word subhuman. So either you're lying about your own experience, or you don't really know anything about Jews, or you're pretending not to know anything about them because you are one.
Gothamgirl ago
"I've never seen a Jew use the word subhuman."
To best defeat the Jew you must learn what they have learned. Read the Talmud, subhuman/gentile is used quite frequently.
I defend Kevdude because you keep accusing him of giving "Me" information and it wasn't. I really know nothing about him whatsoever. As a matter of fact I made memes poking fun of him for defending Srayzie. The only conversations I ever had with him was after all this went down, he sent me messages asking me to come clean about where the info came from.
Crensch ago
They don't use the exact word. They don't want goyim knowing or having in their mind the idea that some things that walk on two legs around our downtown areas are not human.
If you don't know where the information ultimately came from, then you really have no right to say it didn't come from Kev. At the very most you could say that you specifically did not get it from him but you don't know where it came from. Instead historically you have told me specifically that it wasn't Kev.
So, let me get this straight. Because I called your kid names, your pedophile wannabe husband attacked someone that wasn't me?
Gothamgirl ago
I have been telling you it wasn't Kevdude who gave me the info, since day 1.
"So, let me get this straight. Because I called your kid names, your pedophile wannabe husband attacked someone that wasn't me?"
Yes, you, Srayzie and Shizy were as thick as thieves, and zyklon knew that. Plus you had made posts defending her, she was easiest to troll. You have a little more armour and toughness then her. He wasn't my wannabe husband, he made it very clear he was a parasite on my pocketbook, and that is all, and that's not love. But again he isn't a pedo, just a troll. He fooled you with fake shit about my family. Which started this while mess. Why don't you go and attack him on Poal? It's odd he gets such a free pass, and everyone else is chewed out over it, continuously..
Crensch ago
So you financially supported the guy that doxxed a woman off of the site.
Your narrative falls apart when we weren't thick as thieves until after you and the pedophile you financially backed started in on srayzie.
I like how you continually pop in to correct the record about Kev despite there being absolutely no reason for anyone to believe you.
Gothamgirl ago
No I didn't financially support anyone, that's what he claimed he was dating me for, when we broke up. In other words it was never real from the start.
Our first round of arguments (You and I and them) didn't include zyklon at all. I mistakenly accused Srayzie of something awful. Zyklon listened to me get stressed and cry about it, for a year.
I don't really honestly don't care what you believe necessarily, you are extremely stubborn and hard headed, that's why I repeat myself to you.
Crensch ago
I made you cry, so you stayed with a guy that was threatening to rape a child because of it.
Gothamgirl ago
No, that's when we broke up shortly after. He was stating things I could no longer defend and won't. In real life he isn't a Pedo but the comments he made, made me extremely uncomfortable.
Crensch ago
I don't care who you are, if you make those kind of comments constantly to the point that they are believed by someone, anyone, you are a pedophile.
Whatever you think you know about a person that does that otherwise is pretty fucking irrelevant.
Anyone that was still on his side for any reason after that deserves everything that happened to them. And they sure as fuck don't deserve to pretend to be pizzagate researchers.
Gothamgirl ago
I bet Srayzie went through the same horrible torment that I went through, after her kids were talked about... Do you really believe, you are any better then him? You aren't.
Crensch ago
Nothing to do with that. I could ask random passers-by if they would think zyklon and everyone helping him were probably pedophiles using generic terms - what do you think they'd all say?
I'm better than all of you. He threatened to rape and kill a child constantly for a month and y'all stuck by him and attacked his victim. I didn't do anything remotely like that, and you and everyone else knows it.
That's bullshit and you know it. Banned? Who gives a fuck, he kept posting it all over the site. "Oh he didn't post it in THAT subverse, but he sure did elsewhere, and pinged here there! Totally means it's OK to threaten rape and murder on children!"
You're a sick fuck, did you know that?
You... ALL of you seem to want to defend him as not a pedophile... you take THAT seriously. Why is that?
The lady doth protest...?
1) Why would anyone believe you. You're a pathological liar.
2) He posted about it constantly, daily, almost hourly, for a month straight. Who really thinks he didn't fantasize aobut it?
3) What else would a pedo-supporter say? You have a dog in this fight, because you stuck by him when he was saying those things, and you know that destroys your reputation and credibility.
Your definition of standing up for you:
Threatening a child with rape and murder.
Got it.
Gothamgirl ago
Ok I had enough of your delusional bullshit, you can fuck off.
Crensch ago
Your definition of standing up for you:
Threatening a child with rape and murder.
Got it.
Gothamgirl ago
You live fantasy land, I did none of that, nor did I ask anyone too.
Crensch ago
You bring it up as if it's a defense of both his behaviour, and your sticking with him.
Invaders are invaders. My wanting to defend my people from genocide has fuck-all to do with your husband-wannabe threatening to RAPE children, and you claiming he's doing it "to stand up for you".
Your definition of standing up for you:
Threatening a child with rape and murder.
Got it.
ESOTERICshade ago
Just because you want it to be true doesn't mean it is. The reason you are always wrong is because your motives are to feed your ego instead of make things better. Not gonna stick around to listen to your ignorant drivel anymore tonight.
Crensch ago
Jews always project their own flaws onto others.
Remember when I had proof of far more than you ever had proof for where claims are concerned?
Show me in my sticky on you where I'm wrong.
I'll post some more good content to PG for you to wake up to.
ESOTERICshade ago
Knock yourself out. Waste more time. You don't bother me.
Crensch ago
Apparently I bother you enough to make you a liar, telling me in the comment above that you're not going to stick around anymore tonight.