Time for more digging, folks. QAnon started dropping names tonight related to Rachel Chandler, the Epstein sex slave-turned modeling photographer we exposed two years ago. He's urged anons to dig into before (the last time, right before Voat went down for three days last April).
He's made dozens of child trafficking related posts today. You can see them all, here. A couple of notables:
"Ray Chandler = Allison Mack x 100"
"THE STANDARD HOTEL.
RACHEL CHANDLER."
And he dropped a link to a new artist I hadn't heard of:
" http://www.michalchelbin.com/portfolio_in.asp?id=1477&type=100228&sub_title=Strangely_Familiar&langid=1
Connection to Ray Chandler? Are you awake?"
So I did a little digging into Michal Chelbin. She's an Israeli artist who features "art" portrait photography of kids with dead eyes, topless preteens with their fathers in disturbing positions, naked underwater, and groups of topless girls hugging. She says:
"My images are vehicles to address universal themes: family issues, ideas of normality, puberty with its all incumbent pains and distractions, the desire for fame. An example of this is the adolescent girls I photograph, many of them are on the verge of sexual consciousness. They are in this difficult age, torn between innocence and experience. While their bodies might be still that of a child, their gaze sometimes imply differently. I try to create an informal scene, in which they directly confront the viewer. I feel they and their stories represent with most clarity the theme that interests me the most and which is the twilight zone between reality and fantasy. My aim is to record a scene where there is a mixture of direct information and enigmas and in which there are visual contrasts between young and old, large and small, normal and abnormal. My playground lies between the private and the public, between fiction and documentary. For me, the image is just the tip of the iceberg; it’s the gate to a story waiting to be told and which I try to depict in an appealing yet troubling way."
QAnon then dropped the link to the FBI tip line, like he did last year.
I'm not getting the connection between Chelbin and Rachel Chandler, though, other than they are both creepy female photographers with pedo-appeal photography.
While I was Google image searching Chelbin, Google offered up another "art" photographer doing "similar" work, Sally Mann. NSFW -- fully naked preteens. The second photo in the "Family Color" series is a little girl on a couch, naked, with claw marks on her stomach, titled "Dog Scratches." https://archive.fo/z2K05
(NSFW) Mann is apparently a famous America photographer roundly criticized for her naked kid photography, including a kid in a ditch, as well as her book of corpse photography.
The exhibition was divided into five sections that "visually depict[ed] the eternal cycle of life, death, and regeneration."[5]
Mann was inspired to produce the photographs in the book by her reactions to several different events. The first of these was the death of her father; later events that inspired her interest in death were the shooting of a prison escapee on the grounds of her Lexington, Virginia, farm and the death of her pet greyhound, Eva.[2] Mann arranged for Eva's skin to be preserved by tanning and buried her body in a cage in order to prevent the remains from being carried off by wild animals. She later dug up the cage and photographed the dog's skeletal remains.[2][6] A series of photos documenting Eva's decomposition is included in the book.[1][7]
Despite the fact that some critics found the images off-putting, Mann expressed surprise that the book did not garner the controversy of her previous books which featured nude photos of her young children. While giving the book a favourable review, Blake Morrison expressed his surprise that no one had questioned her right to publish photographs of the dead when there had been extensive protests over her images of her children.[2]
Nothing to see, there!?
Anyone care to dig more? I'm short on time at the moment. Neither of these artists came up in a SearchVoat of our archives.
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
Re the pool pic:
One of the guys pictured is George Nader. He is a convicted pedophile. He worked for Bill Clinton, but has been employed by Trump ally Eric Prince as a consultant. = Still is employed as of today.
Yep. That's the same Eric Prince who has called out HRC, and is a Trump ally.
And then this:
Sex trafficking? Kosovo? Underage prostitution? Rings a bell?
Yep.
Dyncorp, the defense contractor Prince teamed up with after Trump got elected, has quite a history of being involved in child trafficking and organ trafficking in Kosovo.
TL;DR: While (rightly) calling out Hillary and her ilk, Prince has knowingly employed pedophiles, and he took one of them, George Nader, to meetings with Kushner and Trump Jr.
@letsdothis3 @ASolo @shewhomustbeobeyed @new4now @SandHog
SandHog ago
Argh, so many rabbit holes so little time.
think- ago
Indeed.
SandHog ago
Stratfor is probably tied in there somewhere too. I never really did any deep digging on the defense contractor stuff aside from being familiar with the names/entities that were revealed via wikileaks.
think- ago
Well, here we have someone - Erik Prince - who knowingly employs pedos, at least one of them a convicted one, who has a company where men use underage prostitutes, and Prince doesn't give a shit; and on top of all this he teams up with DynCorp, who has a disturbing history of being involved in child trafficking and organ trafficking.
(And I'm not even talking about money laundering etc. which he is obviously also being involved in, or his employees killing civilians in situations where it wasn't justified.)
And, so we have someone who endorses pedophile behaviour, and exactly how many times has Q called him out?
Not. A. Single. Time.
@letsdothis3 @new4now @ASolo @SandHog @EricKaliberhall
SandHog ago
I can't speak as to what Q did or did not do or why. As you know I don't follow that. I will say that the swamp is the swamp precisely because these people keep getting recycled across different administrations. When positions need filled at that level of government they get filled by the most 'qualified' people from a very small pool of those who have the specialized experience, skill set and connections. Which is why these same people keep popping up over and over again. The thing is that most of the qualified people are either mired in this stuff in some capacity or have connections to the ones who are. It's a small world and the players protect and promote one another regardless of which party is in charge. Prince is definitely slimy. Dunno about his sister.
I will also say that I don't believe for one second that Trump is complicit in this if that is what you are implying. If there was real dirt on him they would have used it to take him out in the primaries and served us up the 'choice' of Clinton or Bush and nothing would have changed. I also don't think he understood exactly what he was getting into given the amount of turnover there has been in his administration since he got in.
think- ago
This.
Define 'complicit'. I define it as 'looking the other way', and 'cooperating with people and companies regardless of their shady and criminal activities'.
Sending Kushner and Roger Stone to meet with a convicted pedo as if this would be a normal thing to do is being 'complicit'.
Looking the other way when your buddy, mentor and attorney is (at best) friends with pedos, and is working for pedos, or maybe even running a child rape blackmail racket is being complicit.
Tolerating Epstein in his Mar-a-Lago club is being 'complicit'.
Giving money to dirty military industrial complex companies like DynCorp, who have been known for being involved in child trafficking and organ trafficking is being 'complicit'.
And if we allege Q = Trump's PR department, stating 'Trump is saviour, military is saviour' is frightening.
Last time I checked, Christ was saviour. Pushing the idea of military tribunals like Q does is the first step to facism.
Trump is endorsing, supporting and financing the dirty military industrial complex. Q obviously doesn't indend to call these people out for their pedo activities.
This is not the way it works. You have dirt on people, and you keep them in check with it. He would not have been able to become POTUS if they hadn't dirt on him. (Although I have no idea what kind of dirt this may be.)
He doesn't have the people skills he would need in this position. That's one reason for the turnover.
@letsdothis3 @shewhomustbeobeyed @ASolo @EricKaliberhall
kestrel9 ago
Do you believe he colluded with the Russians to win?
think- ago
No. I think that the whole 'muh Russian collusion' story misses the point, and is a psy-op by the globalists.
I never could wrap my head around why Trump seemed to like Putin so much though when he first came into office.
Then I read about his Trump Tower-in-Moscow-plans, and I thought 'bingo'.
But that's about it. I think he had business interests in Russia, not that there was any big 'Russian collusion' regarding the elections.
The irony of the whole 'muh Russian collusion' story is that, of course, the Dems have always had ties to Russia, which they did not handle in a - ahem - very transparent way.
According to the Daily Mail, Nader gave $ 2,000,000 to an Israeli company specialized in Social Media campaigns after the election. He, Prince and the Israeli company's Psy-Group's CEO allegedly met before the election to discuss a Social Media campaign in order to support Trump.
I think this is likely true, since it is no surprise that the Saudis (> Nader), the military industrial complex (> Prince) and the Israelis (> Social Media company 'Psy-Group') wanted Trump to become POTUS.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6790847/Mercenary-Erik-Prince-admits-pre-election-Trump-Tower-meeting-Don-Jr-Saudi-emissary.html
https://medium.com/@ScottMStedman/amid-mueller-scrutiny-swiss-parent-company-of-psy-group-scrubs-online-presence-1bbe302199d3
SandHog ago
I think you are misreading the situation. That said I really don't want to get into it about Trump. I'm not here for that. Please don't take this personally because this isn't about you at all and I don't want you take it that way. I both like and respect you and I have no issue with your opinions on this topic even though we happen to disagree. This is simply my position and thoughts on the matter in general and they are not going to change barring a betrayal of epic proportion.
Trump is not like them. There is no real evidence he is like them aside form the Epstein stuff but everyone who was anyone has ties to Epstein. That was the whole point. Seek out rich and powerful people and compromise them. I've looked through all of the shit they threw at him from the very beginning of his campaign. You have some idea of how autistically thorough I can be and I have seen nothing that would indicate he is part of 'the club'. Don't just take my word for it. By all means dig as much as you feel the need to. I'll not discourage you from that. I'm just not interested in participating because I came to my own conclusions a long time ago.
Conversely, I will not do the work of the deranged (((progressive))) pieces of shit that are in the process of gleefully destroying what is left of my country culturally, economically and demographically. These same people who are doing their damndest to convince a generation of children that it is perfectly normal for them to choose their own gender. These people who delight in the perversion of every tradition, moral standard and religious belief that was responsible for the very creation my country and the formation of my own values. I cannot adequately express the disdain and disgust I hold for these people. I will not hand them ammunition in the form of information that they will then warp and use as a weapon against me and everything I stand for. I will not do it.
Trump has been attempting to do everything he said he would before he took office. The forces aligned against him are not doing so as part of some elaborate psyop. (((Hollywood))) (((MSM))) (((Social Media))) They absolutely fucking loathe him to the bottom of their black souls. There is a reason the voices of his supporters are silenced and censored across the breadth of the social media landscape. Hell, it's how a lot us found our way here. There is a reason the propaganda level has been cranked up to twelve over the last few years; they even ripped the damn knob off and threw it away. If he is taken down there will be blood in the streets. I'd like to avoid that if at all possible. I'm not entirely sure that it is over the long run to be quite honest. I don't know if one man is even capable of altering a system so vile, corrupt and entrenched. I hope so because the alternative is exceedingly violent and messy and the eventual outcome is far from clear. I remain optimistic because to choose otherwise leads to a descent into nihilism and self-hatred. If he is not the change perhaps he is the agent necessary for that change to occur. Only time will tell.
auralsects ago
LMAO, dumbass, by even using the "swamp" meme you're endorsing Q.
No serious person refers to the likes of Bolton as anything but a Zionist neocon Jew-lover, full stop. Not some vague "swamp creature" lmao.
One jewphemism got you believing there was an actual "swamp" where the corrupt dregs accumulated -- DEFINITELY not an identifiable ethnic group called Jews, oy vey, just a renegade band of GLOBALISTS, whom Trump will vanquish Hollywood style